Cargando…

Screening for pregestational and gestational diabetes in pregnancy: a survey of obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium

BACKGROUND: There is lack of consensus concerning the best screening strategy for gestational diabetes (GDM). The aim of our survey was therefore to investigate attitudes and practices of all obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium regarding screening for pregestational diabetes in early...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benhalima, Katrien, Van Crombrugge, Paul, Devlieger, Roland, Verhaeghe, Johan, Verhaegen, Ann, De Catte, Luc, Mathieu, Chantal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24405764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-5996-5-66
_version_ 1782291817806430208
author Benhalima, Katrien
Van Crombrugge, Paul
Devlieger, Roland
Verhaeghe, Johan
Verhaegen, Ann
De Catte, Luc
Mathieu, Chantal
author_facet Benhalima, Katrien
Van Crombrugge, Paul
Devlieger, Roland
Verhaeghe, Johan
Verhaegen, Ann
De Catte, Luc
Mathieu, Chantal
author_sort Benhalima, Katrien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is lack of consensus concerning the best screening strategy for gestational diabetes (GDM). The aim of our survey was therefore to investigate attitudes and practices of all obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium regarding screening for pregestational diabetes in early pregnancy and screening for GDM. We also aimed to identify the penetrance of the ‘International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups’ (IADPSG) screening strategy for GDM. METHODS: The survey was conducted from May 2012 till January 2013. The survey was distributed to every obstetrical center in the northern part of Belgium by email and/or mail with reminders by phone and personal contact. RESULTS: From the 65 obstetrical centers, 69% responded. Of all centers, 27% had a structured database on the number of women with GDM. Of all centers, 82% screened for pregestational diabetes in early pregnancy and 56% of centers screened for GDM before 24 weeks. Screening before 24 weeks was mostly based on risk factors. Screening for GDM after 24 weeks, was done universally in 87% of centers. The mean estimated prevalence of GDM was 7 ± 5%. The most commonly used screening strategy was a two-step approach with a glucose challenge test (GCT) and 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), used by 56% of centers, with 23 centers using the Carpenter & Coustan criteria. The 75 g OGTT with the IADPSG criteria was used by 33% of centers but 4 of these centers still used a GCT before proceeding to the full OGTT. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrates that in the northern part of Belgium, there still is a large variation in screening strategy for pregestational diabetes in early pregnancy and GDM. Only 25% of centers have already implemented the one-step IADPSG screening strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3833269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38332692013-11-20 Screening for pregestational and gestational diabetes in pregnancy: a survey of obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium Benhalima, Katrien Van Crombrugge, Paul Devlieger, Roland Verhaeghe, Johan Verhaegen, Ann De Catte, Luc Mathieu, Chantal Diabetol Metab Syndr Research BACKGROUND: There is lack of consensus concerning the best screening strategy for gestational diabetes (GDM). The aim of our survey was therefore to investigate attitudes and practices of all obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium regarding screening for pregestational diabetes in early pregnancy and screening for GDM. We also aimed to identify the penetrance of the ‘International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups’ (IADPSG) screening strategy for GDM. METHODS: The survey was conducted from May 2012 till January 2013. The survey was distributed to every obstetrical center in the northern part of Belgium by email and/or mail with reminders by phone and personal contact. RESULTS: From the 65 obstetrical centers, 69% responded. Of all centers, 27% had a structured database on the number of women with GDM. Of all centers, 82% screened for pregestational diabetes in early pregnancy and 56% of centers screened for GDM before 24 weeks. Screening before 24 weeks was mostly based on risk factors. Screening for GDM after 24 weeks, was done universally in 87% of centers. The mean estimated prevalence of GDM was 7 ± 5%. The most commonly used screening strategy was a two-step approach with a glucose challenge test (GCT) and 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), used by 56% of centers, with 23 centers using the Carpenter & Coustan criteria. The 75 g OGTT with the IADPSG criteria was used by 33% of centers but 4 of these centers still used a GCT before proceeding to the full OGTT. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrates that in the northern part of Belgium, there still is a large variation in screening strategy for pregestational diabetes in early pregnancy and GDM. Only 25% of centers have already implemented the one-step IADPSG screening strategy. BioMed Central 2013-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3833269/ /pubmed/24405764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-5996-5-66 Text en Copyright © 2013 Benhalima et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Benhalima, Katrien
Van Crombrugge, Paul
Devlieger, Roland
Verhaeghe, Johan
Verhaegen, Ann
De Catte, Luc
Mathieu, Chantal
Screening for pregestational and gestational diabetes in pregnancy: a survey of obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium
title Screening for pregestational and gestational diabetes in pregnancy: a survey of obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium
title_full Screening for pregestational and gestational diabetes in pregnancy: a survey of obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium
title_fullStr Screening for pregestational and gestational diabetes in pregnancy: a survey of obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium
title_full_unstemmed Screening for pregestational and gestational diabetes in pregnancy: a survey of obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium
title_short Screening for pregestational and gestational diabetes in pregnancy: a survey of obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium
title_sort screening for pregestational and gestational diabetes in pregnancy: a survey of obstetrical centers in the northern part of belgium
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24405764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-5996-5-66
work_keys_str_mv AT benhalimakatrien screeningforpregestationalandgestationaldiabetesinpregnancyasurveyofobstetricalcentersinthenorthernpartofbelgium
AT vancrombruggepaul screeningforpregestationalandgestationaldiabetesinpregnancyasurveyofobstetricalcentersinthenorthernpartofbelgium
AT devliegerroland screeningforpregestationalandgestationaldiabetesinpregnancyasurveyofobstetricalcentersinthenorthernpartofbelgium
AT verhaeghejohan screeningforpregestationalandgestationaldiabetesinpregnancyasurveyofobstetricalcentersinthenorthernpartofbelgium
AT verhaegenann screeningforpregestationalandgestationaldiabetesinpregnancyasurveyofobstetricalcentersinthenorthernpartofbelgium
AT decatteluc screeningforpregestationalandgestationaldiabetesinpregnancyasurveyofobstetricalcentersinthenorthernpartofbelgium
AT mathieuchantal screeningforpregestationalandgestationaldiabetesinpregnancyasurveyofobstetricalcentersinthenorthernpartofbelgium