Cargando…

Lean body mass: the development and validation of prediction equations in healthy adults

BACKGROUND: There is a loss of lean body mass (LBM) with increasing age. A low LBM has been associated with increased adverse effects from prescribed medications such as chemotherapy. Accurate assessment of LBM may allow for more accurate drug prescribing. The aims of this study were to develop new...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Solomon, Visvanathan, Thavarajah, Field, John, Ward, Leigh C, Chapman, Ian, Adams, Robert, Wittert, Gary, Visvanathan, Renuka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24499708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-14-53
_version_ 1782291823715155968
author Yu, Solomon
Visvanathan, Thavarajah
Field, John
Ward, Leigh C
Chapman, Ian
Adams, Robert
Wittert, Gary
Visvanathan, Renuka
author_facet Yu, Solomon
Visvanathan, Thavarajah
Field, John
Ward, Leigh C
Chapman, Ian
Adams, Robert
Wittert, Gary
Visvanathan, Renuka
author_sort Yu, Solomon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a loss of lean body mass (LBM) with increasing age. A low LBM has been associated with increased adverse effects from prescribed medications such as chemotherapy. Accurate assessment of LBM may allow for more accurate drug prescribing. The aims of this study were to develop new prediction equations (PEs) for LBM with anthropometric and biochemical variables from a development cohort and then validate the best performing PEs in validation cohorts. METHODS: PEs were developed in a cohort of 188 healthy subjects and then validated in a convenience cohort of 52 healthy subjects. The best performing anthropometric PE was then compared to published anthropometric PEs in an older (age ≥ 50 years) cohort of 2287 people. Best subset regression analysis was used to derive PEs. Correlation, Bland-Altman and Sheiner & Beal methods were used to validate and compare the PEs against dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived LBM. RESULTS: The PE which included biochemistry variables performed only marginally better than the anthropometric PE. The anthropometric PE on average over-estimated LBM by 0.74 kg in the combined cohort. Across gender (male vs. female), body mass index (< 22, 22- < 27, 27- < 30 and ≥30 kg/m(2)) and age groups (50–64, 65–79 and ≥80 years), the maximum mean over-estimation of the anthropometric PE was 1.36 kg. CONCLUSIONS: A new anthropometric PE has been developed that offers an alternative for clinicians when access to DXA is limited. Further research is required to determine the clinical utility and if it will improve the safety of medication use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3833312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38333122013-11-28 Lean body mass: the development and validation of prediction equations in healthy adults Yu, Solomon Visvanathan, Thavarajah Field, John Ward, Leigh C Chapman, Ian Adams, Robert Wittert, Gary Visvanathan, Renuka BMC Pharmacol Toxicol Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a loss of lean body mass (LBM) with increasing age. A low LBM has been associated with increased adverse effects from prescribed medications such as chemotherapy. Accurate assessment of LBM may allow for more accurate drug prescribing. The aims of this study were to develop new prediction equations (PEs) for LBM with anthropometric and biochemical variables from a development cohort and then validate the best performing PEs in validation cohorts. METHODS: PEs were developed in a cohort of 188 healthy subjects and then validated in a convenience cohort of 52 healthy subjects. The best performing anthropometric PE was then compared to published anthropometric PEs in an older (age ≥ 50 years) cohort of 2287 people. Best subset regression analysis was used to derive PEs. Correlation, Bland-Altman and Sheiner & Beal methods were used to validate and compare the PEs against dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived LBM. RESULTS: The PE which included biochemistry variables performed only marginally better than the anthropometric PE. The anthropometric PE on average over-estimated LBM by 0.74 kg in the combined cohort. Across gender (male vs. female), body mass index (< 22, 22- < 27, 27- < 30 and ≥30 kg/m(2)) and age groups (50–64, 65–79 and ≥80 years), the maximum mean over-estimation of the anthropometric PE was 1.36 kg. CONCLUSIONS: A new anthropometric PE has been developed that offers an alternative for clinicians when access to DXA is limited. Further research is required to determine the clinical utility and if it will improve the safety of medication use. BioMed Central 2013-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3833312/ /pubmed/24499708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-14-53 Text en Copyright © 2013 Yu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yu, Solomon
Visvanathan, Thavarajah
Field, John
Ward, Leigh C
Chapman, Ian
Adams, Robert
Wittert, Gary
Visvanathan, Renuka
Lean body mass: the development and validation of prediction equations in healthy adults
title Lean body mass: the development and validation of prediction equations in healthy adults
title_full Lean body mass: the development and validation of prediction equations in healthy adults
title_fullStr Lean body mass: the development and validation of prediction equations in healthy adults
title_full_unstemmed Lean body mass: the development and validation of prediction equations in healthy adults
title_short Lean body mass: the development and validation of prediction equations in healthy adults
title_sort lean body mass: the development and validation of prediction equations in healthy adults
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24499708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-14-53
work_keys_str_mv AT yusolomon leanbodymassthedevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionequationsinhealthyadults
AT visvanathanthavarajah leanbodymassthedevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionequationsinhealthyadults
AT fieldjohn leanbodymassthedevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionequationsinhealthyadults
AT wardleighc leanbodymassthedevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionequationsinhealthyadults
AT chapmanian leanbodymassthedevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionequationsinhealthyadults
AT adamsrobert leanbodymassthedevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionequationsinhealthyadults
AT wittertgary leanbodymassthedevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionequationsinhealthyadults
AT visvanathanrenuka leanbodymassthedevelopmentandvalidationofpredictionequationsinhealthyadults