Cargando…
Test Result Management in Global Health Settings
Across the globe, the ways in which patients' test results are managed are as varied as the many different types of healthcare systems that manage these data. The outcomes, however, are often not too dissimilar: too many clinically significant test results fall through the cracks. The consequen...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Global Advances in Health and Medicine
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24278831 http://dx.doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2012.1.4.006 |
_version_ | 1782291851107106816 |
---|---|
author | Palazuelos, Daniel Payne, Jonathan D. Dalal, Anuj K. |
author_facet | Palazuelos, Daniel Payne, Jonathan D. Dalal, Anuj K. |
author_sort | Palazuelos, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Across the globe, the ways in which patients' test results are managed are as varied as the many different types of healthcare systems that manage these data. The outcomes, however, are often not too dissimilar: too many clinically significant test results fall through the cracks. The consequences of not following up test results in a timely manner are serious and often devastating to patients: diagnoses are delayed, treatments are not initiated or altered in time, and diseases progress. In resource-poor settings, test results too commonly get filed away within the paper chart in ways that isolate them and prevent passage to future providers caring for a patient. To make matters worse, the onus to act upon these test results often rests on patients who need to return to the clinic within a specified timeframe in order to obtain their results but who may not have the means or are too ill to do so. Even in more developed healthcare settings that use electronic records, clinical data residing in the electronic medical record (EMR) are often stubbornly “static”—key pieces of clinical information are frequently not recognized, retrieved, or shared easily. In this way, EMRs are not unlike paper record systems, and therefore, EMRs alone will not solve this problem. To illustrate this problem, consider the case of a patient newly diagnosed with HIV in 3 different healthcare delivery settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3833518 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Global Advances in Health and Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38335182013-11-25 Test Result Management in Global Health Settings Palazuelos, Daniel Payne, Jonathan D. Dalal, Anuj K. Glob Adv Health Med Features Across the globe, the ways in which patients' test results are managed are as varied as the many different types of healthcare systems that manage these data. The outcomes, however, are often not too dissimilar: too many clinically significant test results fall through the cracks. The consequences of not following up test results in a timely manner are serious and often devastating to patients: diagnoses are delayed, treatments are not initiated or altered in time, and diseases progress. In resource-poor settings, test results too commonly get filed away within the paper chart in ways that isolate them and prevent passage to future providers caring for a patient. To make matters worse, the onus to act upon these test results often rests on patients who need to return to the clinic within a specified timeframe in order to obtain their results but who may not have the means or are too ill to do so. Even in more developed healthcare settings that use electronic records, clinical data residing in the electronic medical record (EMR) are often stubbornly “static”—key pieces of clinical information are frequently not recognized, retrieved, or shared easily. In this way, EMRs are not unlike paper record systems, and therefore, EMRs alone will not solve this problem. To illustrate this problem, consider the case of a patient newly diagnosed with HIV in 3 different healthcare delivery settings. Global Advances in Health and Medicine 2012-09 2012-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3833518/ /pubmed/24278831 http://dx.doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2012.1.4.006 Text en © 2012 GAHM LLC. |
spellingShingle | Features Palazuelos, Daniel Payne, Jonathan D. Dalal, Anuj K. Test Result Management in Global Health Settings |
title | Test Result Management in Global Health Settings |
title_full | Test Result Management in Global Health Settings |
title_fullStr | Test Result Management in Global Health Settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Test Result Management in Global Health Settings |
title_short | Test Result Management in Global Health Settings |
title_sort | test result management in global health settings |
topic | Features |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24278831 http://dx.doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2012.1.4.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT palazuelosdaniel testresultmanagementinglobalhealthsettings AT paynejonathand testresultmanagementinglobalhealthsettings AT dalalanujk testresultmanagementinglobalhealthsettings |