Cargando…

Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)

Abstract. The family Phyllostomidae belongs to the most abundant and diverse group of bats in the Neotropics with more morphological traits variation at the family level than any other group within mammals. In this work, we present data of chromosome banding (G, C and Ag-NOR) and Fluorescence In Sit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomes, Anderson José Baia, Nagamachi, Cleusa Yoshiko, Rodrigues, Luís Reginaldo Ribeiro, Farias, Solange Gomes, Rissino, Jorge Dores, Pieczarka, Julio Cesar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v6i2.1679
_version_ 1782291898892812288
author Gomes, Anderson José Baia
Nagamachi, Cleusa Yoshiko
Rodrigues, Luís Reginaldo Ribeiro
Farias, Solange Gomes
Rissino, Jorge Dores
Pieczarka, Julio Cesar
author_facet Gomes, Anderson José Baia
Nagamachi, Cleusa Yoshiko
Rodrigues, Luís Reginaldo Ribeiro
Farias, Solange Gomes
Rissino, Jorge Dores
Pieczarka, Julio Cesar
author_sort Gomes, Anderson José Baia
collection PubMed
description Abstract. The family Phyllostomidae belongs to the most abundant and diverse group of bats in the Neotropics with more morphological traits variation at the family level than any other group within mammals. In this work, we present data of chromosome banding (G, C and Ag-NOR) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) for representatives of Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 collected in four states of Brazil (Amazonas, Bahia, Mato Grosso and Pará). Two karyomorphs were found in this species: 2n=34, FN=64 in populations from western Pará and Mato Grosso states and 2n=34, FN=62 from Amazonas, Bahia, and northeastern Pará and Marajó Island (northern). Difference in the Fundamental Number is determined by variation in the size of the Nucleolar Organizer Region (NOR) accompanied with heterochromatin on chromosomes of pair 16 or, alternatively, a pericentric inversion. The C-banding technique detected constitutive heterochromatin in the centromeric regions of all chromosomes and on the distal part of the long arm of pair 15 of specimens from all localities. FISH with a DNA telomeric probe did not show any interstitial sequence, and an 18S rDNA probe and silver staining revealed the presence of NOR in the long arm of the pair 15, associated with heterochromatin, and in the short arm of the pair 16 for all specimens. The intra-specific analysis using chromosome banding did not show any significant difference between the samples. The comparative analyses using G-banding have shown that nearly all chromosomes of Rhinophylla pumilio were conserved in the chromosome complements of Glossophaga soricina Pallas, 1766, Phyllostomus hastatus Pallas, 1767, Phyllostomus discolor Wagner, 1843 and Mimon crenulatum Geoffroy, 1801, with a single chromosomal pair unique to Rhinophylla pumilio (pair 15). However, two chromosomes of Mimon crenulatum are polymorphic for two independent pericentric inversions. The karyotype with 2n=34, NF=62 is probably the ancestral one for the other karyotypes described for Rhinophylla pumilio.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3833795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38337952013-11-20 Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera) Gomes, Anderson José Baia Nagamachi, Cleusa Yoshiko Rodrigues, Luís Reginaldo Ribeiro Farias, Solange Gomes Rissino, Jorge Dores Pieczarka, Julio Cesar Comp Cytogenet Article Abstract. The family Phyllostomidae belongs to the most abundant and diverse group of bats in the Neotropics with more morphological traits variation at the family level than any other group within mammals. In this work, we present data of chromosome banding (G, C and Ag-NOR) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) for representatives of Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 collected in four states of Brazil (Amazonas, Bahia, Mato Grosso and Pará). Two karyomorphs were found in this species: 2n=34, FN=64 in populations from western Pará and Mato Grosso states and 2n=34, FN=62 from Amazonas, Bahia, and northeastern Pará and Marajó Island (northern). Difference in the Fundamental Number is determined by variation in the size of the Nucleolar Organizer Region (NOR) accompanied with heterochromatin on chromosomes of pair 16 or, alternatively, a pericentric inversion. The C-banding technique detected constitutive heterochromatin in the centromeric regions of all chromosomes and on the distal part of the long arm of pair 15 of specimens from all localities. FISH with a DNA telomeric probe did not show any interstitial sequence, and an 18S rDNA probe and silver staining revealed the presence of NOR in the long arm of the pair 15, associated with heterochromatin, and in the short arm of the pair 16 for all specimens. The intra-specific analysis using chromosome banding did not show any significant difference between the samples. The comparative analyses using G-banding have shown that nearly all chromosomes of Rhinophylla pumilio were conserved in the chromosome complements of Glossophaga soricina Pallas, 1766, Phyllostomus hastatus Pallas, 1767, Phyllostomus discolor Wagner, 1843 and Mimon crenulatum Geoffroy, 1801, with a single chromosomal pair unique to Rhinophylla pumilio (pair 15). However, two chromosomes of Mimon crenulatum are polymorphic for two independent pericentric inversions. The karyotype with 2n=34, NF=62 is probably the ancestral one for the other karyotypes described for Rhinophylla pumilio. Pensoft Publishers 2012-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3833795/ /pubmed/24260663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v6i2.1679 Text en Anderson José Baia Gomes, Cleusa Yoshiko Nagamachi, Luís Reginaldo Ribeiro Rodrigues, Solange Gomes Farias, Jorge Dores Rissino, Julio Cesar Pieczarka http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Gomes, Anderson José Baia
Nagamachi, Cleusa Yoshiko
Rodrigues, Luís Reginaldo Ribeiro
Farias, Solange Gomes
Rissino, Jorge Dores
Pieczarka, Julio Cesar
Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)
title Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)
title_full Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)
title_fullStr Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)
title_full_unstemmed Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)
title_short Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)
title_sort karyotypic variation in rhinophylla pumilio peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of phyllostomidae (chiroptera)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v6i2.1679
work_keys_str_mv AT gomesandersonjosebaia karyotypicvariationinrhinophyllapumiliopeters1865andcomparativeanalysiswithrepresentativesoftwosubfamiliesofphyllostomidaechiroptera
AT nagamachicleusayoshiko karyotypicvariationinrhinophyllapumiliopeters1865andcomparativeanalysiswithrepresentativesoftwosubfamiliesofphyllostomidaechiroptera
AT rodriguesluisreginaldoribeiro karyotypicvariationinrhinophyllapumiliopeters1865andcomparativeanalysiswithrepresentativesoftwosubfamiliesofphyllostomidaechiroptera
AT fariassolangegomes karyotypicvariationinrhinophyllapumiliopeters1865andcomparativeanalysiswithrepresentativesoftwosubfamiliesofphyllostomidaechiroptera
AT rissinojorgedores karyotypicvariationinrhinophyllapumiliopeters1865andcomparativeanalysiswithrepresentativesoftwosubfamiliesofphyllostomidaechiroptera
AT pieczarkajuliocesar karyotypicvariationinrhinophyllapumiliopeters1865andcomparativeanalysiswithrepresentativesoftwosubfamiliesofphyllostomidaechiroptera