Cargando…

A comparison between heart rate and heart rate variability as indicators of cardiac health and fitness

Quantification of cardiac autonomic activity and control via heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) is known to provide prognostic information in clinical populations. Issues with regard to standardization and interpretation of HRV data make the use of the more easily accessible HR on its...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grant, Catharina C., Murray, Carien, Janse van Rensburg, Dina C., Fletcher, Lizelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3834240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24312058
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00337
_version_ 1782291949187760128
author Grant, Catharina C.
Murray, Carien
Janse van Rensburg, Dina C.
Fletcher, Lizelle
author_facet Grant, Catharina C.
Murray, Carien
Janse van Rensburg, Dina C.
Fletcher, Lizelle
author_sort Grant, Catharina C.
collection PubMed
description Quantification of cardiac autonomic activity and control via heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) is known to provide prognostic information in clinical populations. Issues with regard to standardization and interpretation of HRV data make the use of the more easily accessible HR on its own as an indicator of autonomic cardiac control very appealing. The aim of this study was to investigate the strength of associations between an important cardio vascular health metric such as VO(2)max and the following: HR, HRV indicators, and HR normalized HRV indicators. A cross sectional descriptive study was done including 145 healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 22 years. HRV was quantified by time domain, frequency domain and Poincaré plot analysis. Indirect VO(2)max was determined using the Multistage Coopers test. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to quantify the strength of the associations. Both simple linear and multiple stepwise regressions were performed to be able to discriminate between the role of the individual indicators as well as their combined association with VO(2)max. Only HR, RR interval, and pNN50 showed significant (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p = 0.03) correlations with VO(2)max. Stepwise multiple regression indicated that, when combining all HRV indicators the most important predictor of cardio vascular fitness as represented by VO(2)max, is HR. HR explains 17% of the variation, while the inclusion of HF (high frequency HRV indicator) added only an additional 3.1% to the coefficient of determination. Results also showed when testing the normalized indicators, HR explained of the largest percentage of the changes in VO(2)max (16.5%). Thus, HR on its own is the most important predictor of changes in an important cardiac health metric such as VO(2)max. These results may indicate that during investigation of exercise ability (VO(2)max) phenomena, quantification of HRV may not add significant value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3834240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38342402013-12-05 A comparison between heart rate and heart rate variability as indicators of cardiac health and fitness Grant, Catharina C. Murray, Carien Janse van Rensburg, Dina C. Fletcher, Lizelle Front Physiol Physiology Quantification of cardiac autonomic activity and control via heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) is known to provide prognostic information in clinical populations. Issues with regard to standardization and interpretation of HRV data make the use of the more easily accessible HR on its own as an indicator of autonomic cardiac control very appealing. The aim of this study was to investigate the strength of associations between an important cardio vascular health metric such as VO(2)max and the following: HR, HRV indicators, and HR normalized HRV indicators. A cross sectional descriptive study was done including 145 healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 22 years. HRV was quantified by time domain, frequency domain and Poincaré plot analysis. Indirect VO(2)max was determined using the Multistage Coopers test. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to quantify the strength of the associations. Both simple linear and multiple stepwise regressions were performed to be able to discriminate between the role of the individual indicators as well as their combined association with VO(2)max. Only HR, RR interval, and pNN50 showed significant (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p = 0.03) correlations with VO(2)max. Stepwise multiple regression indicated that, when combining all HRV indicators the most important predictor of cardio vascular fitness as represented by VO(2)max, is HR. HR explains 17% of the variation, while the inclusion of HF (high frequency HRV indicator) added only an additional 3.1% to the coefficient of determination. Results also showed when testing the normalized indicators, HR explained of the largest percentage of the changes in VO(2)max (16.5%). Thus, HR on its own is the most important predictor of changes in an important cardiac health metric such as VO(2)max. These results may indicate that during investigation of exercise ability (VO(2)max) phenomena, quantification of HRV may not add significant value. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3834240/ /pubmed/24312058 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00337 Text en Copyright © 2013 Grant, Murray, Janse van Rensburg and Fletcher. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Grant, Catharina C.
Murray, Carien
Janse van Rensburg, Dina C.
Fletcher, Lizelle
A comparison between heart rate and heart rate variability as indicators of cardiac health and fitness
title A comparison between heart rate and heart rate variability as indicators of cardiac health and fitness
title_full A comparison between heart rate and heart rate variability as indicators of cardiac health and fitness
title_fullStr A comparison between heart rate and heart rate variability as indicators of cardiac health and fitness
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between heart rate and heart rate variability as indicators of cardiac health and fitness
title_short A comparison between heart rate and heart rate variability as indicators of cardiac health and fitness
title_sort comparison between heart rate and heart rate variability as indicators of cardiac health and fitness
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3834240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24312058
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00337
work_keys_str_mv AT grantcatharinac acomparisonbetweenheartrateandheartratevariabilityasindicatorsofcardiachealthandfitness
AT murraycarien acomparisonbetweenheartrateandheartratevariabilityasindicatorsofcardiachealthandfitness
AT jansevanrensburgdinac acomparisonbetweenheartrateandheartratevariabilityasindicatorsofcardiachealthandfitness
AT fletcherlizelle acomparisonbetweenheartrateandheartratevariabilityasindicatorsofcardiachealthandfitness
AT grantcatharinac comparisonbetweenheartrateandheartratevariabilityasindicatorsofcardiachealthandfitness
AT murraycarien comparisonbetweenheartrateandheartratevariabilityasindicatorsofcardiachealthandfitness
AT jansevanrensburgdinac comparisonbetweenheartrateandheartratevariabilityasindicatorsofcardiachealthandfitness
AT fletcherlizelle comparisonbetweenheartrateandheartratevariabilityasindicatorsofcardiachealthandfitness