A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Assess Patient-Reported Outcomes after Lung Cancer Surgery

The main objective of this review was to systematically review, assess, and report on the studies that have assessed health related quality of life (HRQOL) after VATS and thoracotomy for resection of lung cancer. We performed a systematic review of six databases. The Downs and Black tool was used to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gazala, Sayf, Pelletier, Jean-Sébastien, Storie, Dale, Johnson, Jeffrey A., Kutsogiannis, Demetrios J., Bédard, Eric L. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Review Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3835912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24302870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/789625
_version_ 1782292233006874624
author Gazala, Sayf
Pelletier, Jean-Sébastien
Storie, Dale
Johnson, Jeffrey A.
Kutsogiannis, Demetrios J.
Bédard, Eric L. R.
author_facet Gazala, Sayf
Pelletier, Jean-Sébastien
Storie, Dale
Johnson, Jeffrey A.
Kutsogiannis, Demetrios J.
Bédard, Eric L. R.
author_sort Gazala, Sayf
collection PubMed
description The main objective of this review was to systematically review, assess, and report on the studies that have assessed health related quality of life (HRQOL) after VATS and thoracotomy for resection of lung cancer. We performed a systematic review of six databases. The Downs and Black tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Five studies were included. In general, patients undergoing VATS have a better HRQOL when compared to thoracotomy; however, there was a high risk of bias in the included studies. The consistent use of a lung cancer specific questionnaire for measuring HRQOL after surgery is encouraged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3835912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38359122013-12-03 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Assess Patient-Reported Outcomes after Lung Cancer Surgery Gazala, Sayf Pelletier, Jean-Sébastien Storie, Dale Johnson, Jeffrey A. Kutsogiannis, Demetrios J. Bédard, Eric L. R. ScientificWorldJournal Review Article The main objective of this review was to systematically review, assess, and report on the studies that have assessed health related quality of life (HRQOL) after VATS and thoracotomy for resection of lung cancer. We performed a systematic review of six databases. The Downs and Black tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Five studies were included. In general, patients undergoing VATS have a better HRQOL when compared to thoracotomy; however, there was a high risk of bias in the included studies. The consistent use of a lung cancer specific questionnaire for measuring HRQOL after surgery is encouraged. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3835912/ /pubmed/24302870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/789625 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sayf Gazala et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Gazala, Sayf
Pelletier, Jean-Sébastien
Storie, Dale
Johnson, Jeffrey A.
Kutsogiannis, Demetrios J.
Bédard, Eric L. R.
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Assess Patient-Reported Outcomes after Lung Cancer Surgery
title A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Assess Patient-Reported Outcomes after Lung Cancer Surgery
title_full A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Assess Patient-Reported Outcomes after Lung Cancer Surgery
title_fullStr A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Assess Patient-Reported Outcomes after Lung Cancer Surgery
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Assess Patient-Reported Outcomes after Lung Cancer Surgery
title_short A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Assess Patient-Reported Outcomes after Lung Cancer Surgery
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis to assess patient-reported outcomes after lung cancer surgery
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3835912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24302870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/789625
work_keys_str_mv AT gazalasayf asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistoassesspatientreportedoutcomesafterlungcancersurgery
AT pelletierjeansebastien asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistoassesspatientreportedoutcomesafterlungcancersurgery
AT storiedale asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistoassesspatientreportedoutcomesafterlungcancersurgery
AT johnsonjeffreya asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistoassesspatientreportedoutcomesafterlungcancersurgery
AT kutsogiannisdemetriosj asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistoassesspatientreportedoutcomesafterlungcancersurgery
AT bedardericlr asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistoassesspatientreportedoutcomesafterlungcancersurgery
AT gazalasayf systematicreviewandmetaanalysistoassesspatientreportedoutcomesafterlungcancersurgery
AT pelletierjeansebastien systematicreviewandmetaanalysistoassesspatientreportedoutcomesafterlungcancersurgery
AT storiedale systematicreviewandmetaanalysistoassesspatientreportedoutcomesafterlungcancersurgery
AT johnsonjeffreya systematicreviewandmetaanalysistoassesspatientreportedoutcomesafterlungcancersurgery
AT kutsogiannisdemetriosj systematicreviewandmetaanalysistoassesspatientreportedoutcomesafterlungcancersurgery
AT bedardericlr systematicreviewandmetaanalysistoassesspatientreportedoutcomesafterlungcancersurgery

Ejemplares similares