Cargando…
Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies
OBJECTIVE: Diets with high glycemic index (GI), with high glycemic load (GL), or high in all carbohydrates may predispose to higher blood glucose and insulin concentrations, glucose intolerance, and risk of type 2 diabetes. We aimed to conduct a systematic literature review and dose–response meta-an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24265366 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0325 |
_version_ | 1782292275715375104 |
---|---|
author | Greenwood, Darren C. Threapleton, Diane E. Evans, Charlotte E.L. Cleghorn, Christine L. Nykjaer, Camilla Woodhead, Charlotte Burley, Victoria J. |
author_facet | Greenwood, Darren C. Threapleton, Diane E. Evans, Charlotte E.L. Cleghorn, Christine L. Nykjaer, Camilla Woodhead, Charlotte Burley, Victoria J. |
author_sort | Greenwood, Darren C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Diets with high glycemic index (GI), with high glycemic load (GL), or high in all carbohydrates may predispose to higher blood glucose and insulin concentrations, glucose intolerance, and risk of type 2 diabetes. We aimed to conduct a systematic literature review and dose–response meta-analysis of evidence from prospective cohorts. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, MEDLINE in-process, Embase, CAB Abstracts, ISI Web of Science, and BIOSIS for prospective studies of GI, GL, and total carbohydrates in relation to risk of type 2 diabetes up to 17 July 2012. Data were extracted from 24 publications on 21 cohort studies. Studies using different exposure categories were combined on the same scale using linear and nonlinear dose–response trends. Summary relative risks (RRs) were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: The summary RR was 1.08 per 5 GI units (95% CI 1.02–1.15; P = 0.01), 1.03 per 20 GL units (95% CI 1.00–1.05; P = 0.02), and 0.97 per 50 g/day of carbohydrate (95% CI 0.90–1.06; P = 0.5). Dose–response trends were linear for GI and GL but more complex for total carbohydrate intake. Heterogeneity was high for all exposures (I(2) >50%), partly accounted for by different covariate adjustment and length of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Included studies were observational and should be interpreted cautiously. However, our findings are consistent with protective effects of low dietary GI and GL, quantifying the range of intakes associated with lower risk. Future research could focus on the type of sugars and other carbohydrates associated with greatest risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3836142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38361422014-12-01 Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies Greenwood, Darren C. Threapleton, Diane E. Evans, Charlotte E.L. Cleghorn, Christine L. Nykjaer, Camilla Woodhead, Charlotte Burley, Victoria J. Diabetes Care Meta-Analysis OBJECTIVE: Diets with high glycemic index (GI), with high glycemic load (GL), or high in all carbohydrates may predispose to higher blood glucose and insulin concentrations, glucose intolerance, and risk of type 2 diabetes. We aimed to conduct a systematic literature review and dose–response meta-analysis of evidence from prospective cohorts. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, MEDLINE in-process, Embase, CAB Abstracts, ISI Web of Science, and BIOSIS for prospective studies of GI, GL, and total carbohydrates in relation to risk of type 2 diabetes up to 17 July 2012. Data were extracted from 24 publications on 21 cohort studies. Studies using different exposure categories were combined on the same scale using linear and nonlinear dose–response trends. Summary relative risks (RRs) were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: The summary RR was 1.08 per 5 GI units (95% CI 1.02–1.15; P = 0.01), 1.03 per 20 GL units (95% CI 1.00–1.05; P = 0.02), and 0.97 per 50 g/day of carbohydrate (95% CI 0.90–1.06; P = 0.5). Dose–response trends were linear for GI and GL but more complex for total carbohydrate intake. Heterogeneity was high for all exposures (I(2) >50%), partly accounted for by different covariate adjustment and length of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Included studies were observational and should be interpreted cautiously. However, our findings are consistent with protective effects of low dietary GI and GL, quantifying the range of intakes associated with lower risk. Future research could focus on the type of sugars and other carbohydrates associated with greatest risk. American Diabetes Association 2013-12 2013-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3836142/ /pubmed/24265366 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0325 Text en © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details. |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Greenwood, Darren C. Threapleton, Diane E. Evans, Charlotte E.L. Cleghorn, Christine L. Nykjaer, Camilla Woodhead, Charlotte Burley, Victoria J. Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies |
title | Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies |
title_full | Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies |
title_fullStr | Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies |
title_short | Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies |
title_sort | glycemic index, glycemic load, carbohydrates, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24265366 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenwooddarrenc glycemicindexglycemicloadcarbohydratesandtype2diabetessystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies AT threapletondianee glycemicindexglycemicloadcarbohydratesandtype2diabetessystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies AT evanscharlotteel glycemicindexglycemicloadcarbohydratesandtype2diabetessystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies AT cleghornchristinel glycemicindexglycemicloadcarbohydratesandtype2diabetessystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies AT nykjaercamilla glycemicindexglycemicloadcarbohydratesandtype2diabetessystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies AT woodheadcharlotte glycemicindexglycemicloadcarbohydratesandtype2diabetessystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies AT burleyvictoriaj glycemicindexglycemicloadcarbohydratesandtype2diabetessystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies |