Cargando…

Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies

OBJECTIVE: Diets with high glycemic index (GI), with high glycemic load (GL), or high in all carbohydrates may predispose to higher blood glucose and insulin concentrations, glucose intolerance, and risk of type 2 diabetes. We aimed to conduct a systematic literature review and dose–response meta-an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greenwood, Darren C., Threapleton, Diane E., Evans, Charlotte E.L., Cleghorn, Christine L., Nykjaer, Camilla, Woodhead, Charlotte, Burley, Victoria J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24265366
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0325
_version_ 1782292275715375104
author Greenwood, Darren C.
Threapleton, Diane E.
Evans, Charlotte E.L.
Cleghorn, Christine L.
Nykjaer, Camilla
Woodhead, Charlotte
Burley, Victoria J.
author_facet Greenwood, Darren C.
Threapleton, Diane E.
Evans, Charlotte E.L.
Cleghorn, Christine L.
Nykjaer, Camilla
Woodhead, Charlotte
Burley, Victoria J.
author_sort Greenwood, Darren C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Diets with high glycemic index (GI), with high glycemic load (GL), or high in all carbohydrates may predispose to higher blood glucose and insulin concentrations, glucose intolerance, and risk of type 2 diabetes. We aimed to conduct a systematic literature review and dose–response meta-analysis of evidence from prospective cohorts. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, MEDLINE in-process, Embase, CAB Abstracts, ISI Web of Science, and BIOSIS for prospective studies of GI, GL, and total carbohydrates in relation to risk of type 2 diabetes up to 17 July 2012. Data were extracted from 24 publications on 21 cohort studies. Studies using different exposure categories were combined on the same scale using linear and nonlinear dose–response trends. Summary relative risks (RRs) were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: The summary RR was 1.08 per 5 GI units (95% CI 1.02–1.15; P = 0.01), 1.03 per 20 GL units (95% CI 1.00–1.05; P = 0.02), and 0.97 per 50 g/day of carbohydrate (95% CI 0.90–1.06; P = 0.5). Dose–response trends were linear for GI and GL but more complex for total carbohydrate intake. Heterogeneity was high for all exposures (I(2) >50%), partly accounted for by different covariate adjustment and length of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Included studies were observational and should be interpreted cautiously. However, our findings are consistent with protective effects of low dietary GI and GL, quantifying the range of intakes associated with lower risk. Future research could focus on the type of sugars and other carbohydrates associated with greatest risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3836142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38361422014-12-01 Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies Greenwood, Darren C. Threapleton, Diane E. Evans, Charlotte E.L. Cleghorn, Christine L. Nykjaer, Camilla Woodhead, Charlotte Burley, Victoria J. Diabetes Care Meta-Analysis OBJECTIVE: Diets with high glycemic index (GI), with high glycemic load (GL), or high in all carbohydrates may predispose to higher blood glucose and insulin concentrations, glucose intolerance, and risk of type 2 diabetes. We aimed to conduct a systematic literature review and dose–response meta-analysis of evidence from prospective cohorts. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, MEDLINE in-process, Embase, CAB Abstracts, ISI Web of Science, and BIOSIS for prospective studies of GI, GL, and total carbohydrates in relation to risk of type 2 diabetes up to 17 July 2012. Data were extracted from 24 publications on 21 cohort studies. Studies using different exposure categories were combined on the same scale using linear and nonlinear dose–response trends. Summary relative risks (RRs) were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: The summary RR was 1.08 per 5 GI units (95% CI 1.02–1.15; P = 0.01), 1.03 per 20 GL units (95% CI 1.00–1.05; P = 0.02), and 0.97 per 50 g/day of carbohydrate (95% CI 0.90–1.06; P = 0.5). Dose–response trends were linear for GI and GL but more complex for total carbohydrate intake. Heterogeneity was high for all exposures (I(2) >50%), partly accounted for by different covariate adjustment and length of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Included studies were observational and should be interpreted cautiously. However, our findings are consistent with protective effects of low dietary GI and GL, quantifying the range of intakes associated with lower risk. Future research could focus on the type of sugars and other carbohydrates associated with greatest risk. American Diabetes Association 2013-12 2013-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3836142/ /pubmed/24265366 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0325 Text en © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Greenwood, Darren C.
Threapleton, Diane E.
Evans, Charlotte E.L.
Cleghorn, Christine L.
Nykjaer, Camilla
Woodhead, Charlotte
Burley, Victoria J.
Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies
title Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies
title_full Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies
title_fullStr Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies
title_full_unstemmed Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies
title_short Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Carbohydrates, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies
title_sort glycemic index, glycemic load, carbohydrates, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24265366
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0325
work_keys_str_mv AT greenwooddarrenc glycemicindexglycemicloadcarbohydratesandtype2diabetessystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT threapletondianee glycemicindexglycemicloadcarbohydratesandtype2diabetessystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT evanscharlotteel glycemicindexglycemicloadcarbohydratesandtype2diabetessystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT cleghornchristinel glycemicindexglycemicloadcarbohydratesandtype2diabetessystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT nykjaercamilla glycemicindexglycemicloadcarbohydratesandtype2diabetessystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT woodheadcharlotte glycemicindexglycemicloadcarbohydratesandtype2diabetessystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT burleyvictoriaj glycemicindexglycemicloadcarbohydratesandtype2diabetessystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies