Cargando…

Magnitude of the Dawn Phenomenon and Its Impact on the Overall Glucose Exposure in Type 2 Diabetes: Is this of concern?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the magnitude of the dawn phenomenon and its impact on the total glucose exposure in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 248 noninsulin-treated persons with type 2 diabetes who underwent continuous glucose monitoring were divided into three groups selected b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monnier, Louis, Colette, Claude, Dejager, Sylvie, Owens, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24170753
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2127
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To assess the magnitude of the dawn phenomenon and its impact on the total glucose exposure in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 248 noninsulin-treated persons with type 2 diabetes who underwent continuous glucose monitoring were divided into three groups selected by treatments: diet alone (n = 53); insulin sensitizers alone (n = 82); and insulin secretagogues alone or in combination with insulin sensitizers (n = 113). The dawn phenomenon (∂ glucose, mg/dL) was quantified by its absolute increment from nocturnal nadir to prebreakfast value. The participants were secondarily divided into two paired subsets after they had been separated by the presence/absence of a dawn phenomenon based on a threshold of 20 mg/dL and matched for glucose nadir. The impact of the dawn phenomenon was assessed on HbA(1c) and 24-h mean glucose. RESULTS: The median of ∂ glucose (interquartile range) was 16.0 (0–31.5 mg/dL) in the 248 subjects, and no differences were observed across groups selected by HbA(1c) or treatments. In the overall population, the mean impacts on HbA(1c) and 24-h mean glucose were 4.3 ± 1.3 mmol/mol (0.39 ± 0.12%) and 12.4 ± 2.4 mg/dL, respectively. The mean impact on 24-h mean glucose was not statistically different between those on diet alone (16.7 ± 5.9 mg/dL) compared with the two subsets treated with oral hypoglycemic agents (11.2 ± 5.3 and 8.5 ± 7.5 mg/dL). CONCLUSIONS: The impact of the dawn phenomenon on overall glycemic control in type 2 diabetes, as depicted by the HbA(1c) level, was ∼0.4% and not eliminated by any of the currently available armamentarium of oral antidiabetes agents.