Cargando…

Phylogenomics and Coalescent Analyses Resolve Extant Seed Plant Relationships

The extant seed plants include more than 260,000 species that belong to five main lineages: angiosperms, conifers, cycads, Ginkgo, and gnetophytes. Despite tremendous effort using molecular data, phylogenetic relationships among these five lineages remain uncertain. Here, we provide the first broad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xi, Zhenxiang, Rest, Joshua S., Davis, Charles C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24278335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080870
_version_ 1782292342098624512
author Xi, Zhenxiang
Rest, Joshua S.
Davis, Charles C.
author_facet Xi, Zhenxiang
Rest, Joshua S.
Davis, Charles C.
author_sort Xi, Zhenxiang
collection PubMed
description The extant seed plants include more than 260,000 species that belong to five main lineages: angiosperms, conifers, cycads, Ginkgo, and gnetophytes. Despite tremendous effort using molecular data, phylogenetic relationships among these five lineages remain uncertain. Here, we provide the first broad coalescent-based species tree estimation of seed plants using genome-scale nuclear and plastid data By incorporating 305 nuclear genes and 47 plastid genes from 14 species, we identify that i) extant gymnosperms (i.e., conifers, cycads, Ginkgo, and gnetophytes) are monophyletic, ii) gnetophytes exhibit discordant placements within conifers between their nuclear and plastid genomes, and iii) cycads plus Ginkgo form a clade that is sister to all remaining extant gymnosperms. We additionally observe that the placement of Ginkgo inferred from coalescent analyses is congruent across different nucleotide rate partitions. In contrast, the standard concatenation method produces strongly supported, but incongruent placements of Ginkgo between slow- and fast-evolving sites. Specifically, fast-evolving sites yield relationships in conflict with coalescent analyses. We hypothesize that this incongruence may be related to the way in which concatenation methods treat sites with elevated nucleotide substitution rates. More empirical and simulation investigations are needed to understand this potential weakness of concatenation methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3836751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38367512013-11-25 Phylogenomics and Coalescent Analyses Resolve Extant Seed Plant Relationships Xi, Zhenxiang Rest, Joshua S. Davis, Charles C. PLoS One Research Article The extant seed plants include more than 260,000 species that belong to five main lineages: angiosperms, conifers, cycads, Ginkgo, and gnetophytes. Despite tremendous effort using molecular data, phylogenetic relationships among these five lineages remain uncertain. Here, we provide the first broad coalescent-based species tree estimation of seed plants using genome-scale nuclear and plastid data By incorporating 305 nuclear genes and 47 plastid genes from 14 species, we identify that i) extant gymnosperms (i.e., conifers, cycads, Ginkgo, and gnetophytes) are monophyletic, ii) gnetophytes exhibit discordant placements within conifers between their nuclear and plastid genomes, and iii) cycads plus Ginkgo form a clade that is sister to all remaining extant gymnosperms. We additionally observe that the placement of Ginkgo inferred from coalescent analyses is congruent across different nucleotide rate partitions. In contrast, the standard concatenation method produces strongly supported, but incongruent placements of Ginkgo between slow- and fast-evolving sites. Specifically, fast-evolving sites yield relationships in conflict with coalescent analyses. We hypothesize that this incongruence may be related to the way in which concatenation methods treat sites with elevated nucleotide substitution rates. More empirical and simulation investigations are needed to understand this potential weakness of concatenation methods. Public Library of Science 2013-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3836751/ /pubmed/24278335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080870 Text en © 2013 Xi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xi, Zhenxiang
Rest, Joshua S.
Davis, Charles C.
Phylogenomics and Coalescent Analyses Resolve Extant Seed Plant Relationships
title Phylogenomics and Coalescent Analyses Resolve Extant Seed Plant Relationships
title_full Phylogenomics and Coalescent Analyses Resolve Extant Seed Plant Relationships
title_fullStr Phylogenomics and Coalescent Analyses Resolve Extant Seed Plant Relationships
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenomics and Coalescent Analyses Resolve Extant Seed Plant Relationships
title_short Phylogenomics and Coalescent Analyses Resolve Extant Seed Plant Relationships
title_sort phylogenomics and coalescent analyses resolve extant seed plant relationships
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24278335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080870
work_keys_str_mv AT xizhenxiang phylogenomicsandcoalescentanalysesresolveextantseedplantrelationships
AT restjoshuas phylogenomicsandcoalescentanalysesresolveextantseedplantrelationships
AT davischarlesc phylogenomicsandcoalescentanalysesresolveextantseedplantrelationships