Cargando…

Randomized controlled trial of the Medifast 5 & 1 Plan for weight loss

OBJECTIVE: The Medifast 5 & 1 Plan (MD) is a portion-controlled, nutritionally-balanced, low-fat weight-loss plan. We studied the effects of MD compared with a reduced-energy, food-based diet (FB) on body weight, waist circumference, fat mass, and other measures in adults. DESIGN: We conducted a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shikany, James M., Thomas, Amy S., Beasley, T. Mark, Lewis, Cora E., Allison, David B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23567927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.43
_version_ 1782292355742695424
author Shikany, James M.
Thomas, Amy S.
Beasley, T. Mark
Lewis, Cora E.
Allison, David B.
author_facet Shikany, James M.
Thomas, Amy S.
Beasley, T. Mark
Lewis, Cora E.
Allison, David B.
author_sort Shikany, James M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The Medifast 5 & 1 Plan (MD) is a portion-controlled, nutritionally-balanced, low-fat weight-loss plan. We studied the effects of MD compared with a reduced-energy, food-based diet (FB) on body weight, waist circumference, fat mass, and other measures in adults. DESIGN: We conducted a 2 parallel-arm, randomized, controlled trial comparing MD to FB over 52 weeks. A total of 120 men and women aged 19-65 years with BMI ≥35 and ≤50 kg/m(2) were randomized to MD (n = 60) or FB (n = 60). Follow-up included a 26-week weight-loss phase and 26-week weight-maintenance phase. Anthropometric, body composition, biochemical, and appetite/satiety measures were performed at baseline, 26 and 52 weeks. An intention-to-treat, linear mixed models analysis was the primary analysis. RESULTS: Fifty MD subjects (83.3%) and 45 FB subjects (75.0%) completed the study on assigned treatment. At 26 weeks, race-adjusted mean weight loss was 7.5 kg in MD subjects vs. 3.8 kg in FB subjects (P = 0.0002 for difference); reduction in waist circumference was 5.7 cm in MD vs. 3.7 cm in FB (P = 0.0064); and fat mass loss was 6.4 kg in MD vs. 3.7 kg in FB (P = 0.0011). At 52 weeks, the corresponding reductions were 4.7 vs. 1.9 kg (P = 0.0004); 5.0 vs. 3.6 cm (P = 0.0082); and 4.1 vs. 1.9 kg (P = 0.0019) in MD and FB subjects, respectively. CONCLUSION: In obese adults, MD resulted in significantly greater reductions in body weight and fat compared with an FB diet for one year after randomization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3836833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38368332014-06-01 Randomized controlled trial of the Medifast 5 & 1 Plan for weight loss Shikany, James M. Thomas, Amy S. Beasley, T. Mark Lewis, Cora E. Allison, David B. Int J Obes (Lond) Article OBJECTIVE: The Medifast 5 & 1 Plan (MD) is a portion-controlled, nutritionally-balanced, low-fat weight-loss plan. We studied the effects of MD compared with a reduced-energy, food-based diet (FB) on body weight, waist circumference, fat mass, and other measures in adults. DESIGN: We conducted a 2 parallel-arm, randomized, controlled trial comparing MD to FB over 52 weeks. A total of 120 men and women aged 19-65 years with BMI ≥35 and ≤50 kg/m(2) were randomized to MD (n = 60) or FB (n = 60). Follow-up included a 26-week weight-loss phase and 26-week weight-maintenance phase. Anthropometric, body composition, biochemical, and appetite/satiety measures were performed at baseline, 26 and 52 weeks. An intention-to-treat, linear mixed models analysis was the primary analysis. RESULTS: Fifty MD subjects (83.3%) and 45 FB subjects (75.0%) completed the study on assigned treatment. At 26 weeks, race-adjusted mean weight loss was 7.5 kg in MD subjects vs. 3.8 kg in FB subjects (P = 0.0002 for difference); reduction in waist circumference was 5.7 cm in MD vs. 3.7 cm in FB (P = 0.0064); and fat mass loss was 6.4 kg in MD vs. 3.7 kg in FB (P = 0.0011). At 52 weeks, the corresponding reductions were 4.7 vs. 1.9 kg (P = 0.0004); 5.0 vs. 3.6 cm (P = 0.0082); and 4.1 vs. 1.9 kg (P = 0.0019) in MD and FB subjects, respectively. CONCLUSION: In obese adults, MD resulted in significantly greater reductions in body weight and fat compared with an FB diet for one year after randomization. 2013-04-09 2013-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3836833/ /pubmed/23567927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.43 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Shikany, James M.
Thomas, Amy S.
Beasley, T. Mark
Lewis, Cora E.
Allison, David B.
Randomized controlled trial of the Medifast 5 & 1 Plan for weight loss
title Randomized controlled trial of the Medifast 5 & 1 Plan for weight loss
title_full Randomized controlled trial of the Medifast 5 & 1 Plan for weight loss
title_fullStr Randomized controlled trial of the Medifast 5 & 1 Plan for weight loss
title_full_unstemmed Randomized controlled trial of the Medifast 5 & 1 Plan for weight loss
title_short Randomized controlled trial of the Medifast 5 & 1 Plan for weight loss
title_sort randomized controlled trial of the medifast 5 & 1 plan for weight loss
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23567927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.43
work_keys_str_mv AT shikanyjamesm randomizedcontrolledtrialofthemedifast51planforweightloss
AT thomasamys randomizedcontrolledtrialofthemedifast51planforweightloss
AT beasleytmark randomizedcontrolledtrialofthemedifast51planforweightloss
AT lewiscorae randomizedcontrolledtrialofthemedifast51planforweightloss
AT allisondavidb randomizedcontrolledtrialofthemedifast51planforweightloss