Cargando…

A Generalized Measurement Model to Quantify Health: The Multi-Attribute Preference Response Model

After 40 years of deriving metric values for health status or health-related quality of life, the effective quantification of subjective health outcomes is still a challenge. Here, two of the best measurement tools, the discrete choice and the Rasch model, are combined to create a new model for deri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Krabbe, Paul F. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24278141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079494
_version_ 1782292365798539264
author Krabbe, Paul F. M.
author_facet Krabbe, Paul F. M.
author_sort Krabbe, Paul F. M.
collection PubMed
description After 40 years of deriving metric values for health status or health-related quality of life, the effective quantification of subjective health outcomes is still a challenge. Here, two of the best measurement tools, the discrete choice and the Rasch model, are combined to create a new model for deriving health values. First, existing techniques to value health states are briefly discussed followed by a reflection on the recent revival of interest in patients’ experience with regard to their possible role in health measurement. Subsequently, three basic principles for valid health measurement are reviewed, namely unidimensionality, interval level, and invariance. In the main section, the basic operation of measurement is then discussed in the framework of probabilistic discrete choice analysis (random utility model) and the psychometric Rasch model. It is then shown how combining the main features of these two models yields an integrated measurement model, called the multi-attribute preference response (MAPR) model, which is introduced here. This new model transforms subjective individual rank data into a metric scale using responses from patients who have experienced certain health states. Its measurement mechanism largely prevents biases such as adaptation and coping. Several extensions of the MAPR model are presented. The MAPR model can be applied to a wide range of research problems. If extended with the self-selection of relevant health domains for the individual patient, this model will be more valid than existing valuation techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3836915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38369152013-11-25 A Generalized Measurement Model to Quantify Health: The Multi-Attribute Preference Response Model Krabbe, Paul F. M. PLoS One Research Article After 40 years of deriving metric values for health status or health-related quality of life, the effective quantification of subjective health outcomes is still a challenge. Here, two of the best measurement tools, the discrete choice and the Rasch model, are combined to create a new model for deriving health values. First, existing techniques to value health states are briefly discussed followed by a reflection on the recent revival of interest in patients’ experience with regard to their possible role in health measurement. Subsequently, three basic principles for valid health measurement are reviewed, namely unidimensionality, interval level, and invariance. In the main section, the basic operation of measurement is then discussed in the framework of probabilistic discrete choice analysis (random utility model) and the psychometric Rasch model. It is then shown how combining the main features of these two models yields an integrated measurement model, called the multi-attribute preference response (MAPR) model, which is introduced here. This new model transforms subjective individual rank data into a metric scale using responses from patients who have experienced certain health states. Its measurement mechanism largely prevents biases such as adaptation and coping. Several extensions of the MAPR model are presented. The MAPR model can be applied to a wide range of research problems. If extended with the self-selection of relevant health domains for the individual patient, this model will be more valid than existing valuation techniques. Public Library of Science 2013-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3836915/ /pubmed/24278141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079494 Text en © 2013 Paul F. M. Krabbe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Krabbe, Paul F. M.
A Generalized Measurement Model to Quantify Health: The Multi-Attribute Preference Response Model
title A Generalized Measurement Model to Quantify Health: The Multi-Attribute Preference Response Model
title_full A Generalized Measurement Model to Quantify Health: The Multi-Attribute Preference Response Model
title_fullStr A Generalized Measurement Model to Quantify Health: The Multi-Attribute Preference Response Model
title_full_unstemmed A Generalized Measurement Model to Quantify Health: The Multi-Attribute Preference Response Model
title_short A Generalized Measurement Model to Quantify Health: The Multi-Attribute Preference Response Model
title_sort generalized measurement model to quantify health: the multi-attribute preference response model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24278141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079494
work_keys_str_mv AT krabbepaulfm ageneralizedmeasurementmodeltoquantifyhealththemultiattributepreferenceresponsemodel
AT krabbepaulfm generalizedmeasurementmodeltoquantifyhealththemultiattributepreferenceresponsemodel