Cargando…

Outcomes in Adult Scoliosis Patients Who Undergo Spinal Fusion Stopping at L5 Compared with Extension to the Sacrum

Study Design Systematic review. Study Rationale Adult scoliosis is a common disorder that is associated with significantly higher pain, functional impairment, and effect on quality of life than those without scoliosis. Surgical spinal fusion has led to quantifiable improvement in patient's qual...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sardar, Zeeshan M., Ouellet, Jean A., Fischer, Dena J., Skelly, Andrea C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24436707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1357360
_version_ 1782292373396520960
author Sardar, Zeeshan M.
Ouellet, Jean A.
Fischer, Dena J.
Skelly, Andrea C.
author_facet Sardar, Zeeshan M.
Ouellet, Jean A.
Fischer, Dena J.
Skelly, Andrea C.
author_sort Sardar, Zeeshan M.
collection PubMed
description Study Design Systematic review. Study Rationale Adult scoliosis is a common disorder that is associated with significantly higher pain, functional impairment, and effect on quality of life than those without scoliosis. Surgical spinal fusion has led to quantifiable improvement in patient's quality of life. However, for patients undergoing long lumbar fusion, the decision to stop the fusion at L5 or to extend to S1, particularly if the L5–S1 disc is healthy, remains controversial. Objective The aim of the study is to evaluate if fusion stopping at L5 increases the comparative rates of revision, correction loss, and/or poor functional outcomes compared with extension to the sacrum in adult scoliosis patients who require spinal fusion surgery. Materials and Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, the National Guideline Clearinghouse Database and bibliographies of key articles that evaluated adult scoliosis patients who required spinal fusion surgery and compared outcomes for fusions to the sacrum versus stopping at L5. Articles were included on the basis of predetermined criteria and were appraised using a predefined quality-rating scheme. Results From 111 citations, 26 articles underwent full-text review, and 3 retrospective cohort studies met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Revision rates in subjects who underwent spinal fusion to L5 (20.8–23.5%) were lower in two studies compared with those with fusion extending to the sacrum (19.0–58.3%). Studies that assessed deformity correction used different measures, making comparison across studies difficult. No significant differences were found in patient-reported functional outcomes across two studies that used different measures. Conclusion The limited data available suggest that differences in revision rates did not consistently reach statistical significance across studies that compared spinal fusion to L5 versus extension to sacrum in adult scoliosis patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3836950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38369502014-10-01 Outcomes in Adult Scoliosis Patients Who Undergo Spinal Fusion Stopping at L5 Compared with Extension to the Sacrum Sardar, Zeeshan M. Ouellet, Jean A. Fischer, Dena J. Skelly, Andrea C. Evid Based Spine Care J Article Study Design Systematic review. Study Rationale Adult scoliosis is a common disorder that is associated with significantly higher pain, functional impairment, and effect on quality of life than those without scoliosis. Surgical spinal fusion has led to quantifiable improvement in patient's quality of life. However, for patients undergoing long lumbar fusion, the decision to stop the fusion at L5 or to extend to S1, particularly if the L5–S1 disc is healthy, remains controversial. Objective The aim of the study is to evaluate if fusion stopping at L5 increases the comparative rates of revision, correction loss, and/or poor functional outcomes compared with extension to the sacrum in adult scoliosis patients who require spinal fusion surgery. Materials and Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, the National Guideline Clearinghouse Database and bibliographies of key articles that evaluated adult scoliosis patients who required spinal fusion surgery and compared outcomes for fusions to the sacrum versus stopping at L5. Articles were included on the basis of predetermined criteria and were appraised using a predefined quality-rating scheme. Results From 111 citations, 26 articles underwent full-text review, and 3 retrospective cohort studies met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Revision rates in subjects who underwent spinal fusion to L5 (20.8–23.5%) were lower in two studies compared with those with fusion extending to the sacrum (19.0–58.3%). Studies that assessed deformity correction used different measures, making comparison across studies difficult. No significant differences were found in patient-reported functional outcomes across two studies that used different measures. Conclusion The limited data available suggest that differences in revision rates did not consistently reach statistical significance across studies that compared spinal fusion to L5 versus extension to sacrum in adult scoliosis patients. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3836950/ /pubmed/24436707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1357360 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Sardar, Zeeshan M.
Ouellet, Jean A.
Fischer, Dena J.
Skelly, Andrea C.
Outcomes in Adult Scoliosis Patients Who Undergo Spinal Fusion Stopping at L5 Compared with Extension to the Sacrum
title Outcomes in Adult Scoliosis Patients Who Undergo Spinal Fusion Stopping at L5 Compared with Extension to the Sacrum
title_full Outcomes in Adult Scoliosis Patients Who Undergo Spinal Fusion Stopping at L5 Compared with Extension to the Sacrum
title_fullStr Outcomes in Adult Scoliosis Patients Who Undergo Spinal Fusion Stopping at L5 Compared with Extension to the Sacrum
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes in Adult Scoliosis Patients Who Undergo Spinal Fusion Stopping at L5 Compared with Extension to the Sacrum
title_short Outcomes in Adult Scoliosis Patients Who Undergo Spinal Fusion Stopping at L5 Compared with Extension to the Sacrum
title_sort outcomes in adult scoliosis patients who undergo spinal fusion stopping at l5 compared with extension to the sacrum
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24436707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1357360
work_keys_str_mv AT sardarzeeshanm outcomesinadultscoliosispatientswhoundergospinalfusionstoppingatl5comparedwithextensiontothesacrum
AT ouelletjeana outcomesinadultscoliosispatientswhoundergospinalfusionstoppingatl5comparedwithextensiontothesacrum
AT fischerdenaj outcomesinadultscoliosispatientswhoundergospinalfusionstoppingatl5comparedwithextensiontothesacrum
AT skellyandreac outcomesinadultscoliosispatientswhoundergospinalfusionstoppingatl5comparedwithextensiontothesacrum