Cargando…

Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations: pooled analysis

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a distinct subgroup of NSCLCs that is particularly responsive to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). A weighted pooled analysis of available studies was performed to evaluate clinical outcome in p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paz-Ares, Luis, Soulières, Denis, Melezínek, Ivan, Moecks, Joachim, Keil, Lorenz, Mok, Tony, Rosell, Rafael, Klughammer, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3837609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20015198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00991.x
_version_ 1782478316729532416
author Paz-Ares, Luis
Soulières, Denis
Melezínek, Ivan
Moecks, Joachim
Keil, Lorenz
Mok, Tony
Rosell, Rafael
Klughammer, Barbara
author_facet Paz-Ares, Luis
Soulières, Denis
Melezínek, Ivan
Moecks, Joachim
Keil, Lorenz
Mok, Tony
Rosell, Rafael
Klughammer, Barbara
author_sort Paz-Ares, Luis
collection PubMed
description Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a distinct subgroup of NSCLCs that is particularly responsive to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). A weighted pooled analysis of available studies was performed to evaluate clinical outcome in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who were treated with chemotherapy or EGFR TKIs. Median progression-free survival (PFS) times were pooled from prospective or retrospective studies that evaluated chemotherapy or single-agent EGFR TKIs (erlotinib or gefitinib) in patients with NSCLC and EGFR mutations. Among the studies identified for inclusion in the analysis, 12 evaluated erlotinib (365 patients), 39 evaluated gefitinib (1069 patients) and 9 evaluated chemotherapy (375 patients). Across all studies, the most common EGFR mutations were deletions in exon 19 and the L858R substitution in exon 21. In the weighted pooled analysis, the overall median PFS was 13.2 months with erlotinib, 9.8 months with gefitinib and 5.9 months with chemotherapy. Using a two-sided permutation, erlotinib and gefitinib produced a longer median PFS versus chemotherapy, both individually (P= 0.000 and P= 0.002, respectively) and as a combined group (EGFR TKI versus chemotherapy, P= 0.000). EGFR TKIs appear to be the most effective treatment for patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Ongoing prospective trials comparing the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy and EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant disease should provide further insight into the most appropriate way to treat this specific group of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3837609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38376092015-04-24 Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations: pooled analysis Paz-Ares, Luis Soulières, Denis Melezínek, Ivan Moecks, Joachim Keil, Lorenz Mok, Tony Rosell, Rafael Klughammer, Barbara J Cell Mol Med Reviews Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a distinct subgroup of NSCLCs that is particularly responsive to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). A weighted pooled analysis of available studies was performed to evaluate clinical outcome in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who were treated with chemotherapy or EGFR TKIs. Median progression-free survival (PFS) times were pooled from prospective or retrospective studies that evaluated chemotherapy or single-agent EGFR TKIs (erlotinib or gefitinib) in patients with NSCLC and EGFR mutations. Among the studies identified for inclusion in the analysis, 12 evaluated erlotinib (365 patients), 39 evaluated gefitinib (1069 patients) and 9 evaluated chemotherapy (375 patients). Across all studies, the most common EGFR mutations were deletions in exon 19 and the L858R substitution in exon 21. In the weighted pooled analysis, the overall median PFS was 13.2 months with erlotinib, 9.8 months with gefitinib and 5.9 months with chemotherapy. Using a two-sided permutation, erlotinib and gefitinib produced a longer median PFS versus chemotherapy, both individually (P= 0.000 and P= 0.002, respectively) and as a combined group (EGFR TKI versus chemotherapy, P= 0.000). EGFR TKIs appear to be the most effective treatment for patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Ongoing prospective trials comparing the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy and EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant disease should provide further insight into the most appropriate way to treat this specific group of patients. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010 2009-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3837609/ /pubmed/20015198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00991.x Text en © 2009 F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. Journal compilation © 2010 Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine/Blackwell Publishing Ltd
spellingShingle Reviews
Paz-Ares, Luis
Soulières, Denis
Melezínek, Ivan
Moecks, Joachim
Keil, Lorenz
Mok, Tony
Rosell, Rafael
Klughammer, Barbara
Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations: pooled analysis
title Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations: pooled analysis
title_full Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations: pooled analysis
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations: pooled analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations: pooled analysis
title_short Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations: pooled analysis
title_sort clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with egfr mutations: pooled analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3837609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20015198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00991.x
work_keys_str_mv AT pazaresluis clinicaloutcomesinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithegfrmutationspooledanalysis
AT soulieresdenis clinicaloutcomesinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithegfrmutationspooledanalysis
AT melezinekivan clinicaloutcomesinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithegfrmutationspooledanalysis
AT moecksjoachim clinicaloutcomesinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithegfrmutationspooledanalysis
AT keillorenz clinicaloutcomesinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithegfrmutationspooledanalysis
AT moktony clinicaloutcomesinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithegfrmutationspooledanalysis
AT rosellrafael clinicaloutcomesinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithegfrmutationspooledanalysis
AT klughammerbarbara clinicaloutcomesinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithegfrmutationspooledanalysis