Cargando…

Clinical Outcome of Ream Versus Unream Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures

BACKGROUND: Stabilization of fractures with an intramedullary nail is a widespread technique in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in adults; however, to ream or not to ream is still being debated. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine clinical results following unre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bagheri, Farshid, Sharifi, Seyed Reza, Mirzadeh, Navid Reza, Hootkani, Alireza, Ebrahimzadeh, Mohamad Hosein, Ashraf, Hami
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3838656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349734
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.4631
_version_ 1782478374534381568
author Bagheri, Farshid
Sharifi, Seyed Reza
Mirzadeh, Navid Reza
Hootkani, Alireza
Ebrahimzadeh, Mohamad Hosein
Ashraf, Hami
author_facet Bagheri, Farshid
Sharifi, Seyed Reza
Mirzadeh, Navid Reza
Hootkani, Alireza
Ebrahimzadeh, Mohamad Hosein
Ashraf, Hami
author_sort Bagheri, Farshid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stabilization of fractures with an intramedullary nail is a widespread technique in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in adults; however, to ream or not to ream is still being debated. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine clinical results following unreamed versus ream intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and August 2009, 50 patients with femoral shaft fractures were treated with unreamed or reamed femoral nails in our clinic. From this prospective single centre study, 16 patients were excluded due to insufficient follow-up data. According to the AO classification, fractures in this study were either type A or B. Dynamic proximal locking was performed in all cases. The remaining 34 patients were divided into two groups of 17 with ream or unream nailing. During and after the operation, we evaluated some variables in whole series. RESULTS: After statistical analyzes, we found that there were no differences in radiologic union time (P = 1) or full weight bearing time (P = 0.73) between ream and unream nailing. Nail breakage or iatrogenic fractures during nail insertion did not occur and we did not have any fat emboli in both groups but one secondary loss of reduction occurred in the unream group. Superficial infection after the operation was seen in one case which was treated successfully with antibiotics. In the ream group surgical time was about thirty minutes longer and differences were significant (P = 0.000). Patients had to pay more for ream nailing but the difference was not significant. We found no statistical difference between union time with or without reaming; on the other hand, there was significant increased operation length, blood loss and systemic changes in BP or So2 in the ream group versus the unream group. CONCLUSIONS: We advocate that unream nailing in traumatic femoral shaft fractures is a simple, safe and effective procedure with significant advantages, especially in multitrauma patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3838656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38386562013-12-12 Clinical Outcome of Ream Versus Unream Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures Bagheri, Farshid Sharifi, Seyed Reza Mirzadeh, Navid Reza Hootkani, Alireza Ebrahimzadeh, Mohamad Hosein Ashraf, Hami Iran Red Crescent Med J Brief Report BACKGROUND: Stabilization of fractures with an intramedullary nail is a widespread technique in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in adults; however, to ream or not to ream is still being debated. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine clinical results following unreamed versus ream intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and August 2009, 50 patients with femoral shaft fractures were treated with unreamed or reamed femoral nails in our clinic. From this prospective single centre study, 16 patients were excluded due to insufficient follow-up data. According to the AO classification, fractures in this study were either type A or B. Dynamic proximal locking was performed in all cases. The remaining 34 patients were divided into two groups of 17 with ream or unream nailing. During and after the operation, we evaluated some variables in whole series. RESULTS: After statistical analyzes, we found that there were no differences in radiologic union time (P = 1) or full weight bearing time (P = 0.73) between ream and unream nailing. Nail breakage or iatrogenic fractures during nail insertion did not occur and we did not have any fat emboli in both groups but one secondary loss of reduction occurred in the unream group. Superficial infection after the operation was seen in one case which was treated successfully with antibiotics. In the ream group surgical time was about thirty minutes longer and differences were significant (P = 0.000). Patients had to pay more for ream nailing but the difference was not significant. We found no statistical difference between union time with or without reaming; on the other hand, there was significant increased operation length, blood loss and systemic changes in BP or So2 in the ream group versus the unream group. CONCLUSIONS: We advocate that unream nailing in traumatic femoral shaft fractures is a simple, safe and effective procedure with significant advantages, especially in multitrauma patients. Kowsar 2013-05-05 2013-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3838656/ /pubmed/24349734 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.4631 Text en Copyright © 2013, Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Bagheri, Farshid
Sharifi, Seyed Reza
Mirzadeh, Navid Reza
Hootkani, Alireza
Ebrahimzadeh, Mohamad Hosein
Ashraf, Hami
Clinical Outcome of Ream Versus Unream Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures
title Clinical Outcome of Ream Versus Unream Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures
title_full Clinical Outcome of Ream Versus Unream Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures
title_fullStr Clinical Outcome of Ream Versus Unream Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcome of Ream Versus Unream Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures
title_short Clinical Outcome of Ream Versus Unream Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures
title_sort clinical outcome of ream versus unream intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3838656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349734
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.4631
work_keys_str_mv AT bagherifarshid clinicaloutcomeofreamversusunreamintramedullarynailingforfemoralshaftfractures
AT sharifiseyedreza clinicaloutcomeofreamversusunreamintramedullarynailingforfemoralshaftfractures
AT mirzadehnavidreza clinicaloutcomeofreamversusunreamintramedullarynailingforfemoralshaftfractures
AT hootkanialireza clinicaloutcomeofreamversusunreamintramedullarynailingforfemoralshaftfractures
AT ebrahimzadehmohamadhosein clinicaloutcomeofreamversusunreamintramedullarynailingforfemoralshaftfractures
AT ashrafhami clinicaloutcomeofreamversusunreamintramedullarynailingforfemoralshaftfractures