Cargando…

Comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States Medicare population: potential economic implications of a new minimally-invasive technology

INTRODUCTION: The economic burden associated with the treatment of low back pain (LBP) in the United States is significant. LBP caused by sacroiliac (SI) joint disruption/degenerative sacroiliitis is most commonly treated with nonoperative care and/or open SI joint surgery. New and effective minimal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ackerman, Stacey J, Polly, David W, Knight, Tyler, Schneider, Karen, Holt, Tim, Cummings, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3838760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24348055
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S52967
_version_ 1782478377998876672
author Ackerman, Stacey J
Polly, David W
Knight, Tyler
Schneider, Karen
Holt, Tim
Cummings, John
author_facet Ackerman, Stacey J
Polly, David W
Knight, Tyler
Schneider, Karen
Holt, Tim
Cummings, John
author_sort Ackerman, Stacey J
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The economic burden associated with the treatment of low back pain (LBP) in the United States is significant. LBP caused by sacroiliac (SI) joint disruption/degenerative sacroiliitis is most commonly treated with nonoperative care and/or open SI joint surgery. New and effective minimally invasive surgery (MIS) options may offer potential cost savings to Medicare. METHODS: An economic model was developed to compare the costs of MIS treatment to nonoperative care for the treatment of SI joint disruption in the hospital inpatient setting in the US Medicare population. Lifetime cost savings (2012 US dollars) were estimated from the published literature and claims data. Costs included treatment, follow-up, diagnostic testing, and retail pharmacy pain medication. Costs of SI joint disruption patients managed with nonoperative care were estimated from the 2005–2010 Medicare 5% Standard Analytic Files using primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes 720.2, 724.6, 739.4, 846.9, or 847.3. MIS fusion hospitalization cost was based on Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) payments of $46,700 (with major complications - DRG 459) and $27,800 (without major complications - DRG 460), weighted assuming 3.8% of patients have complications. MIS fusion professional fee was determined from the 2012 Medicare payment for Current Procedural Terminology code 27280, with an 82% fusion success rate and 1.8% revision rate. Outcomes were discounted by 3.0% per annum. RESULTS: The extrapolated lifetime cost of treating Medicare patients with MIS fusion was $48,185/patient compared to $51,543/patient for nonoperative care, resulting in a $660 million savings to Medicare (196,452 beneficiaries at $3,358 in savings/patient). Including those with ICD-9-CM code 721.3 (lumbosacral spondylosis) increased lifetime cost estimates (up to 478,764 beneficiaries at $8,692 in savings/patient). CONCLUSION: Treating Medicare beneficiaries with MIS fusion in the hospital inpatient setting could save Medicare $660 million over patients’ lifetimes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3838760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38387602013-12-13 Comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States Medicare population: potential economic implications of a new minimally-invasive technology Ackerman, Stacey J Polly, David W Knight, Tyler Schneider, Karen Holt, Tim Cummings, John Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research INTRODUCTION: The economic burden associated with the treatment of low back pain (LBP) in the United States is significant. LBP caused by sacroiliac (SI) joint disruption/degenerative sacroiliitis is most commonly treated with nonoperative care and/or open SI joint surgery. New and effective minimally invasive surgery (MIS) options may offer potential cost savings to Medicare. METHODS: An economic model was developed to compare the costs of MIS treatment to nonoperative care for the treatment of SI joint disruption in the hospital inpatient setting in the US Medicare population. Lifetime cost savings (2012 US dollars) were estimated from the published literature and claims data. Costs included treatment, follow-up, diagnostic testing, and retail pharmacy pain medication. Costs of SI joint disruption patients managed with nonoperative care were estimated from the 2005–2010 Medicare 5% Standard Analytic Files using primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes 720.2, 724.6, 739.4, 846.9, or 847.3. MIS fusion hospitalization cost was based on Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) payments of $46,700 (with major complications - DRG 459) and $27,800 (without major complications - DRG 460), weighted assuming 3.8% of patients have complications. MIS fusion professional fee was determined from the 2012 Medicare payment for Current Procedural Terminology code 27280, with an 82% fusion success rate and 1.8% revision rate. Outcomes were discounted by 3.0% per annum. RESULTS: The extrapolated lifetime cost of treating Medicare patients with MIS fusion was $48,185/patient compared to $51,543/patient for nonoperative care, resulting in a $660 million savings to Medicare (196,452 beneficiaries at $3,358 in savings/patient). Including those with ICD-9-CM code 721.3 (lumbosacral spondylosis) increased lifetime cost estimates (up to 478,764 beneficiaries at $8,692 in savings/patient). CONCLUSION: Treating Medicare beneficiaries with MIS fusion in the hospital inpatient setting could save Medicare $660 million over patients’ lifetimes. Dove Medical Press 2013-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3838760/ /pubmed/24348055 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S52967 Text en © 2013 Ackerman et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ackerman, Stacey J
Polly, David W
Knight, Tyler
Schneider, Karen
Holt, Tim
Cummings, John
Comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States Medicare population: potential economic implications of a new minimally-invasive technology
title Comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States Medicare population: potential economic implications of a new minimally-invasive technology
title_full Comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States Medicare population: potential economic implications of a new minimally-invasive technology
title_fullStr Comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States Medicare population: potential economic implications of a new minimally-invasive technology
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States Medicare population: potential economic implications of a new minimally-invasive technology
title_short Comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States Medicare population: potential economic implications of a new minimally-invasive technology
title_sort comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a united states medicare population: potential economic implications of a new minimally-invasive technology
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3838760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24348055
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S52967
work_keys_str_mv AT ackermanstaceyj comparisonofthecostsofnonoperativecaretominimallyinvasivesurgeryforsacroiliacjointdisruptionanddegenerativesacroiliitisinaunitedstatesmedicarepopulationpotentialeconomicimplicationsofanewminimallyinvasivetechnology
AT pollydavidw comparisonofthecostsofnonoperativecaretominimallyinvasivesurgeryforsacroiliacjointdisruptionanddegenerativesacroiliitisinaunitedstatesmedicarepopulationpotentialeconomicimplicationsofanewminimallyinvasivetechnology
AT knighttyler comparisonofthecostsofnonoperativecaretominimallyinvasivesurgeryforsacroiliacjointdisruptionanddegenerativesacroiliitisinaunitedstatesmedicarepopulationpotentialeconomicimplicationsofanewminimallyinvasivetechnology
AT schneiderkaren comparisonofthecostsofnonoperativecaretominimallyinvasivesurgeryforsacroiliacjointdisruptionanddegenerativesacroiliitisinaunitedstatesmedicarepopulationpotentialeconomicimplicationsofanewminimallyinvasivetechnology
AT holttim comparisonofthecostsofnonoperativecaretominimallyinvasivesurgeryforsacroiliacjointdisruptionanddegenerativesacroiliitisinaunitedstatesmedicarepopulationpotentialeconomicimplicationsofanewminimallyinvasivetechnology
AT cummingsjohn comparisonofthecostsofnonoperativecaretominimallyinvasivesurgeryforsacroiliacjointdisruptionanddegenerativesacroiliitisinaunitedstatesmedicarepopulationpotentialeconomicimplicationsofanewminimallyinvasivetechnology