Cargando…
Business oriented EU human cell and tissue product legislation will adversely impact Member States’ health care systems
The transplantation of conventional human cell and tissue grafts, such as heart valve replacements and skin for severely burnt patients, has saved many lives over the last decades. The late eighties saw the emergence of tissue engineering with the focus on the development of biological substitutes t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3838781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24052113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10561-013-9397-6 |
_version_ | 1782478382278115328 |
---|---|
author | Pirnay, Jean-Paul Vanderkelen, Alain De Vos, Daniel Draye, Jean-Pierre Rose, Thomas Ceulemans, Carl Ectors, Nadine Huys, Isabelle Jennes, Serge Verbeken, Gilbert |
author_facet | Pirnay, Jean-Paul Vanderkelen, Alain De Vos, Daniel Draye, Jean-Pierre Rose, Thomas Ceulemans, Carl Ectors, Nadine Huys, Isabelle Jennes, Serge Verbeken, Gilbert |
author_sort | Pirnay, Jean-Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | The transplantation of conventional human cell and tissue grafts, such as heart valve replacements and skin for severely burnt patients, has saved many lives over the last decades. The late eighties saw the emergence of tissue engineering with the focus on the development of biological substitutes that restore or improve tissue function. In the nineties, at the height of the tissue engineering hype, industry incited policymakers to create a European regulatory environment, which would facilitate the emergence of a strong single market for tissue engineered products and their starting materials (human cells and tissues). In this paper we analyze the elaboration process of this new European Union (EU) human cell and tissue product regulatory regime—i.e. the EU Cell and Tissue Directives (EUCTDs) and the Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) Regulation and evaluate its impact on Member States’ health care systems. We demonstrate that the successful lobbying on key areas of regulatory and policy processes by industry, in congruence with Europe’s risk aversion and urge to promote growth and jobs, led to excessively business oriented legislation. Expensive industry oriented requirements were introduced and contentious social and ethical issues were excluded. We found indications that this new EU safety and health legislation will adversely impact Member States’ health care systems; since 30 December 2012 (the end of the ATMP transitional period) there is a clear threat to the sustainability of some lifesaving and established ATMPs that were provided by public health institutions and small and medium-sized enterprises under the frame of the EUCTDs. In the light of the current economic crisis it is not clear how social security systems will cope with the inflation of costs associated with this new regulatory regime and how priorities will be set with regard to reimbursement decisions. We argue that the ATMP Regulation should urgently be revised to focus on delivering affordable therapies to all who are in need of them and this without necessarily going to the market. The most rapid and elegant way to achieve this would be for the European Commission to publish an interpretative document on “placing on the market of ATMPs,” which keeps tailor-made and niche ATMPs outside of the scope of the medicinal product regulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3838781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38387812013-12-02 Business oriented EU human cell and tissue product legislation will adversely impact Member States’ health care systems Pirnay, Jean-Paul Vanderkelen, Alain De Vos, Daniel Draye, Jean-Pierre Rose, Thomas Ceulemans, Carl Ectors, Nadine Huys, Isabelle Jennes, Serge Verbeken, Gilbert Cell Tissue Bank Original Paper The transplantation of conventional human cell and tissue grafts, such as heart valve replacements and skin for severely burnt patients, has saved many lives over the last decades. The late eighties saw the emergence of tissue engineering with the focus on the development of biological substitutes that restore or improve tissue function. In the nineties, at the height of the tissue engineering hype, industry incited policymakers to create a European regulatory environment, which would facilitate the emergence of a strong single market for tissue engineered products and their starting materials (human cells and tissues). In this paper we analyze the elaboration process of this new European Union (EU) human cell and tissue product regulatory regime—i.e. the EU Cell and Tissue Directives (EUCTDs) and the Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) Regulation and evaluate its impact on Member States’ health care systems. We demonstrate that the successful lobbying on key areas of regulatory and policy processes by industry, in congruence with Europe’s risk aversion and urge to promote growth and jobs, led to excessively business oriented legislation. Expensive industry oriented requirements were introduced and contentious social and ethical issues were excluded. We found indications that this new EU safety and health legislation will adversely impact Member States’ health care systems; since 30 December 2012 (the end of the ATMP transitional period) there is a clear threat to the sustainability of some lifesaving and established ATMPs that were provided by public health institutions and small and medium-sized enterprises under the frame of the EUCTDs. In the light of the current economic crisis it is not clear how social security systems will cope with the inflation of costs associated with this new regulatory regime and how priorities will be set with regard to reimbursement decisions. We argue that the ATMP Regulation should urgently be revised to focus on delivering affordable therapies to all who are in need of them and this without necessarily going to the market. The most rapid and elegant way to achieve this would be for the European Commission to publish an interpretative document on “placing on the market of ATMPs,” which keeps tailor-made and niche ATMPs outside of the scope of the medicinal product regulation. Springer Netherlands 2013-09-20 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3838781/ /pubmed/24052113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10561-013-9397-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Pirnay, Jean-Paul Vanderkelen, Alain De Vos, Daniel Draye, Jean-Pierre Rose, Thomas Ceulemans, Carl Ectors, Nadine Huys, Isabelle Jennes, Serge Verbeken, Gilbert Business oriented EU human cell and tissue product legislation will adversely impact Member States’ health care systems |
title | Business oriented EU human cell and tissue product legislation will adversely impact Member States’ health care systems |
title_full | Business oriented EU human cell and tissue product legislation will adversely impact Member States’ health care systems |
title_fullStr | Business oriented EU human cell and tissue product legislation will adversely impact Member States’ health care systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Business oriented EU human cell and tissue product legislation will adversely impact Member States’ health care systems |
title_short | Business oriented EU human cell and tissue product legislation will adversely impact Member States’ health care systems |
title_sort | business oriented eu human cell and tissue product legislation will adversely impact member states’ health care systems |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3838781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24052113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10561-013-9397-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pirnayjeanpaul businessorientedeuhumancellandtissueproductlegislationwilladverselyimpactmemberstateshealthcaresystems AT vanderkelenalain businessorientedeuhumancellandtissueproductlegislationwilladverselyimpactmemberstateshealthcaresystems AT devosdaniel businessorientedeuhumancellandtissueproductlegislationwilladverselyimpactmemberstateshealthcaresystems AT drayejeanpierre businessorientedeuhumancellandtissueproductlegislationwilladverselyimpactmemberstateshealthcaresystems AT rosethomas businessorientedeuhumancellandtissueproductlegislationwilladverselyimpactmemberstateshealthcaresystems AT ceulemanscarl businessorientedeuhumancellandtissueproductlegislationwilladverselyimpactmemberstateshealthcaresystems AT ectorsnadine businessorientedeuhumancellandtissueproductlegislationwilladverselyimpactmemberstateshealthcaresystems AT huysisabelle businessorientedeuhumancellandtissueproductlegislationwilladverselyimpactmemberstateshealthcaresystems AT jennesserge businessorientedeuhumancellandtissueproductlegislationwilladverselyimpactmemberstateshealthcaresystems AT verbekengilbert businessorientedeuhumancellandtissueproductlegislationwilladverselyimpactmemberstateshealthcaresystems |