Cargando…

Which Sámi? Sámi inclusion criteria in population-based studies of Sámi health and living conditions in Norway – an exploratory study exemplified with data from the SAMINOR study

BACKGROUND: In a situation where national censuses do not record information on ethnicity, studies of the indigenous Sámi people's health and living conditions tend to use varying Sámi inclusion criteria and categorizations. Consequently, the basis on which Sámi study participants are included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pettersen, Torunn, Brustad, Magritt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3838972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24282785
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v72i0.21813
_version_ 1782478400197230592
author Pettersen, Torunn
Brustad, Magritt
author_facet Pettersen, Torunn
Brustad, Magritt
author_sort Pettersen, Torunn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In a situation where national censuses do not record information on ethnicity, studies of the indigenous Sámi people's health and living conditions tend to use varying Sámi inclusion criteria and categorizations. Consequently, the basis on which Sámi study participants are included and categorized when Sámi health and living conditions are explored and compared differs. This may influence the results and conclusions drawn. OBJECTIVE: To explore some numerical consequences of applying principles derived from Norway's Sámi Act as a foundation for formalized inclusion criteria in population-based Sámi studies in Norway. DESIGN: We established 1 geographically based (G1) and 3 individual-based Sámi example populations (I1–I3) by applying diverse Sámi inclusion criteria to data from 17 rural municipalities in Norway north of the Arctic Circle. The data were collected for a population-based study of health and living conditions in 2003–2004 (the SAMINOR study). Our sample consisted of 14,797 participants aged 36–79 years. RESULTS: The size of the individual-based populations varied significantly. I1 (linguistic connection Sámi) made up 35.5% of the sample, I2 (self-identified Sámi) made up 21.0% and I3 (active language Sámi) 17.7%. They were also noticeably unevenly distributed between the 5 Sámi regions defined for this study. The differences for the other characteristics studied were more ambiguous. For the population G1 (residents in the Sámi language area) the only significant difference found between the Sámi and the corresponding non-Sámi population was for household income (OR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.63–0.74). For the populations I1–I3 there were significant differences on all measures except for I2 and education (OR=1.09, 95% CI: 0.99–1.21). CONCLUSIONS: The choice of Sámi inclusion criterion had a clear impact on the size and geographical distribution of the defined populations but lesser influence on the selected characteristics for the Sámi populations relative to the respective non-Sámi ones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3838972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38389722013-11-26 Which Sámi? Sámi inclusion criteria in population-based studies of Sámi health and living conditions in Norway – an exploratory study exemplified with data from the SAMINOR study Pettersen, Torunn Brustad, Magritt Int J Circumpolar Health Original Research Article BACKGROUND: In a situation where national censuses do not record information on ethnicity, studies of the indigenous Sámi people's health and living conditions tend to use varying Sámi inclusion criteria and categorizations. Consequently, the basis on which Sámi study participants are included and categorized when Sámi health and living conditions are explored and compared differs. This may influence the results and conclusions drawn. OBJECTIVE: To explore some numerical consequences of applying principles derived from Norway's Sámi Act as a foundation for formalized inclusion criteria in population-based Sámi studies in Norway. DESIGN: We established 1 geographically based (G1) and 3 individual-based Sámi example populations (I1–I3) by applying diverse Sámi inclusion criteria to data from 17 rural municipalities in Norway north of the Arctic Circle. The data were collected for a population-based study of health and living conditions in 2003–2004 (the SAMINOR study). Our sample consisted of 14,797 participants aged 36–79 years. RESULTS: The size of the individual-based populations varied significantly. I1 (linguistic connection Sámi) made up 35.5% of the sample, I2 (self-identified Sámi) made up 21.0% and I3 (active language Sámi) 17.7%. They were also noticeably unevenly distributed between the 5 Sámi regions defined for this study. The differences for the other characteristics studied were more ambiguous. For the population G1 (residents in the Sámi language area) the only significant difference found between the Sámi and the corresponding non-Sámi population was for household income (OR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.63–0.74). For the populations I1–I3 there were significant differences on all measures except for I2 and education (OR=1.09, 95% CI: 0.99–1.21). CONCLUSIONS: The choice of Sámi inclusion criterion had a clear impact on the size and geographical distribution of the defined populations but lesser influence on the selected characteristics for the Sámi populations relative to the respective non-Sámi ones. Co-Action Publishing 2013-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3838972/ /pubmed/24282785 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v72i0.21813 Text en © 2013 Torunn Pettersen and Magritt Brustad http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Pettersen, Torunn
Brustad, Magritt
Which Sámi? Sámi inclusion criteria in population-based studies of Sámi health and living conditions in Norway – an exploratory study exemplified with data from the SAMINOR study
title Which Sámi? Sámi inclusion criteria in population-based studies of Sámi health and living conditions in Norway – an exploratory study exemplified with data from the SAMINOR study
title_full Which Sámi? Sámi inclusion criteria in population-based studies of Sámi health and living conditions in Norway – an exploratory study exemplified with data from the SAMINOR study
title_fullStr Which Sámi? Sámi inclusion criteria in population-based studies of Sámi health and living conditions in Norway – an exploratory study exemplified with data from the SAMINOR study
title_full_unstemmed Which Sámi? Sámi inclusion criteria in population-based studies of Sámi health and living conditions in Norway – an exploratory study exemplified with data from the SAMINOR study
title_short Which Sámi? Sámi inclusion criteria in population-based studies of Sámi health and living conditions in Norway – an exploratory study exemplified with data from the SAMINOR study
title_sort which sámi? sámi inclusion criteria in population-based studies of sámi health and living conditions in norway – an exploratory study exemplified with data from the saminor study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3838972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24282785
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v72i0.21813
work_keys_str_mv AT pettersentorunn whichsamisamiinclusioncriteriainpopulationbasedstudiesofsamihealthandlivingconditionsinnorwayanexploratorystudyexemplifiedwithdatafromthesaminorstudy
AT brustadmagritt whichsamisamiinclusioncriteriainpopulationbasedstudiesofsamihealthandlivingconditionsinnorwayanexploratorystudyexemplifiedwithdatafromthesaminorstudy