Cargando…
Differential Diagnosis of Focal Non-Cystic Pancreatic Lesions With and Without Proximal Dilation of Pancreatic Duct Noted on CT Scan
OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic duct (PD) dilation proximal to a solid focal pancreatic lesion on computed tomography (CT) scan is considered highly suggestive of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. There is, however, no published data on the differential diagnosis of focal non-cystic pancreatic lesions with and with...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3839021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24195914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2013.15 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic duct (PD) dilation proximal to a solid focal pancreatic lesion on computed tomography (CT) scan is considered highly suggestive of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. There is, however, no published data on the differential diagnosis of focal non-cystic pancreatic lesions with and without PD dilation. We assessed the diagnostic utility of this radiologic finding. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of university-based clinical practice. A total of 445 non-jaundiced patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) (2002–2010) for evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions noted on CT scan were included. Final diagnosis was based on surgical pathology or definitive cytology with supporting clinical follow-up of ≥12 months. Main outcome measurements included (1) differential diagnoses and (2) performance characteristics of EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA) for diagnosing neoplasm in patients with non-cystic pancreatic lesions with and without PD dilation. RESULTS: A neoplasm was finally diagnosed in 152 of 187 patients with and 87 of 258 patients without PD dilation on CT scan. Chronic pancreatitis (diffuse and focal) was the predominant non-malignant diagnosis in patients with PD dilation. In patients without PD dilation, malignant lesions included neuroendocrine tumor, adenocarcinoma, metastasis, PEComa (perivascular epitheloid cell tumor), and lymphoma; and the non-neoplastic diagnosis included chronic pancreatitis, intrapancreatic lymph nodes, and infected pancreatic fluid collection. EUS-FNA had 97.6% accuracy for diagnosing a neoplasm in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Dilation PD proximal to a focal solid pancreatic lesion increases the likelihood of malignancy but the performance characteristics of this radiologic finding are probably inadequate to guide clinical management. Neoplasms without dilated PD often require immunostaining for a definitive diagnosis. |
---|