Cargando…
A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks
Brain network analyses have moved to the forefront of neuroimaging research over the last decade. However, methods for statistically comparing groups of networks have lagged behind. These comparisons have great appeal for researchers interested in gaining further insight into complex brain function...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3839047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2013.00171 |
_version_ | 1782478408132853760 |
---|---|
author | Simpson, Sean L. Lyday, Robert G. Hayasaka, Satoru Marsh, Anthony P. Laurienti, Paul J. |
author_facet | Simpson, Sean L. Lyday, Robert G. Hayasaka, Satoru Marsh, Anthony P. Laurienti, Paul J. |
author_sort | Simpson, Sean L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Brain network analyses have moved to the forefront of neuroimaging research over the last decade. However, methods for statistically comparing groups of networks have lagged behind. These comparisons have great appeal for researchers interested in gaining further insight into complex brain function and how it changes across different mental states and disease conditions. Current comparison approaches generally either rely on a summary metric or on mass-univariate nodal or edge-based comparisons that ignore the inherent topological properties of the network, yielding little power and failing to make network level comparisons. Gleaning deeper insights into normal and abnormal changes in complex brain function demands methods that take advantage of the wealth of data present in an entire brain network. Here we propose a permutation testing framework that allows comparing groups of networks while incorporating topological features inherent in each individual network. We validate our approach using simulated data with known group differences. We then apply the method to functional brain networks derived from fMRI data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3839047 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38390472013-12-09 A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks Simpson, Sean L. Lyday, Robert G. Hayasaka, Satoru Marsh, Anthony P. Laurienti, Paul J. Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience Brain network analyses have moved to the forefront of neuroimaging research over the last decade. However, methods for statistically comparing groups of networks have lagged behind. These comparisons have great appeal for researchers interested in gaining further insight into complex brain function and how it changes across different mental states and disease conditions. Current comparison approaches generally either rely on a summary metric or on mass-univariate nodal or edge-based comparisons that ignore the inherent topological properties of the network, yielding little power and failing to make network level comparisons. Gleaning deeper insights into normal and abnormal changes in complex brain function demands methods that take advantage of the wealth of data present in an entire brain network. Here we propose a permutation testing framework that allows comparing groups of networks while incorporating topological features inherent in each individual network. We validate our approach using simulated data with known group differences. We then apply the method to functional brain networks derived from fMRI data. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3839047/ /pubmed/24324431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2013.00171 Text en Copyright © 2013 Simpson, Lyday, Hayasaka, Marsh and Laurienti. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Simpson, Sean L. Lyday, Robert G. Hayasaka, Satoru Marsh, Anthony P. Laurienti, Paul J. A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks |
title | A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks |
title_full | A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks |
title_fullStr | A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks |
title_full_unstemmed | A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks |
title_short | A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks |
title_sort | permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3839047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2013.00171 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simpsonseanl apermutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks AT lydayrobertg apermutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks AT hayasakasatoru apermutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks AT marshanthonyp apermutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks AT laurientipaulj apermutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks AT simpsonseanl permutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks AT lydayrobertg permutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks AT hayasakasatoru permutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks AT marshanthonyp permutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks AT laurientipaulj permutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks |