Cargando…

Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes

BACKGROUND: Compulsory admission to psychiatric hospitals may be distressing, disruptive to patients and families, and associated with considerable cost to the health service. Improved patient experience and cost reductions could be realised by providing cost-effective crisis planning services. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barrett, Barbara, Waheed, Waquas, Farrelly, Simone, Birchwood, Max, Dunn, Graham, Flach, Clare, Henderson, Claire, Leese, Morven, Lester, Helen, Marshall, Max, Rose, Diana, Sutherby, Kim, Szmukler, George, Thornicroft, Graham, Byford, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3839936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24282495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074210
_version_ 1782478458558873600
author Barrett, Barbara
Waheed, Waquas
Farrelly, Simone
Birchwood, Max
Dunn, Graham
Flach, Clare
Henderson, Claire
Leese, Morven
Lester, Helen
Marshall, Max
Rose, Diana
Sutherby, Kim
Szmukler, George
Thornicroft, Graham
Byford, Sarah
author_facet Barrett, Barbara
Waheed, Waquas
Farrelly, Simone
Birchwood, Max
Dunn, Graham
Flach, Clare
Henderson, Claire
Leese, Morven
Lester, Helen
Marshall, Max
Rose, Diana
Sutherby, Kim
Szmukler, George
Thornicroft, Graham
Byford, Sarah
author_sort Barrett, Barbara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Compulsory admission to psychiatric hospitals may be distressing, disruptive to patients and families, and associated with considerable cost to the health service. Improved patient experience and cost reductions could be realised by providing cost-effective crisis planning services. METHODS: Economic evaluation within a multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing Joint Crisis Plans (JCP) plus treatment as usual (TAU) to TAU alone for patients aged over 16, with at least one psychiatric hospital admission in the previous two years and on the Enhanced Care Programme Approach register. JCPs, containing the patient's treatment preferences for any future psychiatric emergency, are a form of crisis intervention that aim to mitigate the negative consequences of relapse, including hospital admission and use of coercion. Data were collected at baseline and 18-months after randomisation. The primary outcome was admission to hospital under the Mental Health Act. The economic evaluation took a service perspective (health, social care and criminal justice services) and a societal perspective (additionally including criminal activity and productivity losses). FINDINGS: The addition of JCPs to TAU had no significant effect on compulsory admissions or total societal cost per participant over 18-months follow-up. From the service cost perspective, however, evidence suggests a higher probability (80%) of JCPs being the more cost-effective option. Exploration by ethnic group highlights distinct patterns of costs and effects. Whilst the evidence does not support the cost-effectiveness of JCPs for White or Asian ethnic groups, there is at least a 90% probability of the JCP intervention being the more cost-effective option in the Black ethnic group. INTERPRETATION: The results by ethnic group are sufficiently striking to warrant further investigation into the potential for patient gain from JCPs among black patient groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN11501328
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3839936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38399362013-11-26 Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes Barrett, Barbara Waheed, Waquas Farrelly, Simone Birchwood, Max Dunn, Graham Flach, Clare Henderson, Claire Leese, Morven Lester, Helen Marshall, Max Rose, Diana Sutherby, Kim Szmukler, George Thornicroft, Graham Byford, Sarah PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Compulsory admission to psychiatric hospitals may be distressing, disruptive to patients and families, and associated with considerable cost to the health service. Improved patient experience and cost reductions could be realised by providing cost-effective crisis planning services. METHODS: Economic evaluation within a multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing Joint Crisis Plans (JCP) plus treatment as usual (TAU) to TAU alone for patients aged over 16, with at least one psychiatric hospital admission in the previous two years and on the Enhanced Care Programme Approach register. JCPs, containing the patient's treatment preferences for any future psychiatric emergency, are a form of crisis intervention that aim to mitigate the negative consequences of relapse, including hospital admission and use of coercion. Data were collected at baseline and 18-months after randomisation. The primary outcome was admission to hospital under the Mental Health Act. The economic evaluation took a service perspective (health, social care and criminal justice services) and a societal perspective (additionally including criminal activity and productivity losses). FINDINGS: The addition of JCPs to TAU had no significant effect on compulsory admissions or total societal cost per participant over 18-months follow-up. From the service cost perspective, however, evidence suggests a higher probability (80%) of JCPs being the more cost-effective option. Exploration by ethnic group highlights distinct patterns of costs and effects. Whilst the evidence does not support the cost-effectiveness of JCPs for White or Asian ethnic groups, there is at least a 90% probability of the JCP intervention being the more cost-effective option in the Black ethnic group. INTERPRETATION: The results by ethnic group are sufficiently striking to warrant further investigation into the potential for patient gain from JCPs among black patient groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN11501328 Public Library of Science 2013-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3839936/ /pubmed/24282495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074210 Text en © 2013 Barrett et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barrett, Barbara
Waheed, Waquas
Farrelly, Simone
Birchwood, Max
Dunn, Graham
Flach, Clare
Henderson, Claire
Leese, Morven
Lester, Helen
Marshall, Max
Rose, Diana
Sutherby, Kim
Szmukler, George
Thornicroft, Graham
Byford, Sarah
Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes
title Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes
title_full Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes
title_fullStr Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes
title_short Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes
title_sort randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment for people with psychosis: economic outcomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3839936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24282495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074210
work_keys_str_mv AT barrettbarbara randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes
AT waheedwaquas randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes
AT farrellysimone randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes
AT birchwoodmax randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes
AT dunngraham randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes
AT flachclare randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes
AT hendersonclaire randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes
AT leesemorven randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes
AT lesterhelen randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes
AT marshallmax randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes
AT rosediana randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes
AT sutherbykim randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes
AT szmuklergeorge randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes
AT thornicroftgraham randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes
AT byfordsarah randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes