Cargando…
Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes
BACKGROUND: Compulsory admission to psychiatric hospitals may be distressing, disruptive to patients and families, and associated with considerable cost to the health service. Improved patient experience and cost reductions could be realised by providing cost-effective crisis planning services. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3839936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24282495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074210 |
_version_ | 1782478458558873600 |
---|---|
author | Barrett, Barbara Waheed, Waquas Farrelly, Simone Birchwood, Max Dunn, Graham Flach, Clare Henderson, Claire Leese, Morven Lester, Helen Marshall, Max Rose, Diana Sutherby, Kim Szmukler, George Thornicroft, Graham Byford, Sarah |
author_facet | Barrett, Barbara Waheed, Waquas Farrelly, Simone Birchwood, Max Dunn, Graham Flach, Clare Henderson, Claire Leese, Morven Lester, Helen Marshall, Max Rose, Diana Sutherby, Kim Szmukler, George Thornicroft, Graham Byford, Sarah |
author_sort | Barrett, Barbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Compulsory admission to psychiatric hospitals may be distressing, disruptive to patients and families, and associated with considerable cost to the health service. Improved patient experience and cost reductions could be realised by providing cost-effective crisis planning services. METHODS: Economic evaluation within a multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing Joint Crisis Plans (JCP) plus treatment as usual (TAU) to TAU alone for patients aged over 16, with at least one psychiatric hospital admission in the previous two years and on the Enhanced Care Programme Approach register. JCPs, containing the patient's treatment preferences for any future psychiatric emergency, are a form of crisis intervention that aim to mitigate the negative consequences of relapse, including hospital admission and use of coercion. Data were collected at baseline and 18-months after randomisation. The primary outcome was admission to hospital under the Mental Health Act. The economic evaluation took a service perspective (health, social care and criminal justice services) and a societal perspective (additionally including criminal activity and productivity losses). FINDINGS: The addition of JCPs to TAU had no significant effect on compulsory admissions or total societal cost per participant over 18-months follow-up. From the service cost perspective, however, evidence suggests a higher probability (80%) of JCPs being the more cost-effective option. Exploration by ethnic group highlights distinct patterns of costs and effects. Whilst the evidence does not support the cost-effectiveness of JCPs for White or Asian ethnic groups, there is at least a 90% probability of the JCP intervention being the more cost-effective option in the Black ethnic group. INTERPRETATION: The results by ethnic group are sufficiently striking to warrant further investigation into the potential for patient gain from JCPs among black patient groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN11501328 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3839936 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38399362013-11-26 Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes Barrett, Barbara Waheed, Waquas Farrelly, Simone Birchwood, Max Dunn, Graham Flach, Clare Henderson, Claire Leese, Morven Lester, Helen Marshall, Max Rose, Diana Sutherby, Kim Szmukler, George Thornicroft, Graham Byford, Sarah PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Compulsory admission to psychiatric hospitals may be distressing, disruptive to patients and families, and associated with considerable cost to the health service. Improved patient experience and cost reductions could be realised by providing cost-effective crisis planning services. METHODS: Economic evaluation within a multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing Joint Crisis Plans (JCP) plus treatment as usual (TAU) to TAU alone for patients aged over 16, with at least one psychiatric hospital admission in the previous two years and on the Enhanced Care Programme Approach register. JCPs, containing the patient's treatment preferences for any future psychiatric emergency, are a form of crisis intervention that aim to mitigate the negative consequences of relapse, including hospital admission and use of coercion. Data were collected at baseline and 18-months after randomisation. The primary outcome was admission to hospital under the Mental Health Act. The economic evaluation took a service perspective (health, social care and criminal justice services) and a societal perspective (additionally including criminal activity and productivity losses). FINDINGS: The addition of JCPs to TAU had no significant effect on compulsory admissions or total societal cost per participant over 18-months follow-up. From the service cost perspective, however, evidence suggests a higher probability (80%) of JCPs being the more cost-effective option. Exploration by ethnic group highlights distinct patterns of costs and effects. Whilst the evidence does not support the cost-effectiveness of JCPs for White or Asian ethnic groups, there is at least a 90% probability of the JCP intervention being the more cost-effective option in the Black ethnic group. INTERPRETATION: The results by ethnic group are sufficiently striking to warrant further investigation into the potential for patient gain from JCPs among black patient groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN11501328 Public Library of Science 2013-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3839936/ /pubmed/24282495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074210 Text en © 2013 Barrett et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Barrett, Barbara Waheed, Waquas Farrelly, Simone Birchwood, Max Dunn, Graham Flach, Clare Henderson, Claire Leese, Morven Lester, Helen Marshall, Max Rose, Diana Sutherby, Kim Szmukler, George Thornicroft, Graham Byford, Sarah Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes |
title | Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes |
title_full | Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes |
title_short | Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes |
title_sort | randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment for people with psychosis: economic outcomes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3839936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24282495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barrettbarbara randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes AT waheedwaquas randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes AT farrellysimone randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes AT birchwoodmax randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes AT dunngraham randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes AT flachclare randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes AT hendersonclaire randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes AT leesemorven randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes AT lesterhelen randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes AT marshallmax randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes AT rosediana randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes AT sutherbykim randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes AT szmuklergeorge randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes AT thornicroftgraham randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes AT byfordsarah randomisedcontrolledtrialofjointcrisisplanstoreducecompulsorytreatmentforpeoplewithpsychosiseconomicoutcomes |