Cargando…

Are hospital services for self-harm getting better? An observational study examining management, service provision and temporal trends in England

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics and management of individuals attending hospital with self-harm and assess changes in management and service quality since an earlier study in 2001, a period in which national guidance has been available. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: A stratified...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooper, J, Steeg, S, Bennewith, O, Lowe, M, Gunnell, D, House, A, Hawton, K, Kapur, N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3840333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24253029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003444
_version_ 1782478496722845696
author Cooper, J
Steeg, S
Bennewith, O
Lowe, M
Gunnell, D
House, A
Hawton, K
Kapur, N
author_facet Cooper, J
Steeg, S
Bennewith, O
Lowe, M
Gunnell, D
House, A
Hawton, K
Kapur, N
author_sort Cooper, J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics and management of individuals attending hospital with self-harm and assess changes in management and service quality since an earlier study in 2001, a period in which national guidance has been available. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: A stratified random sample of 32 hospitals in England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 6442 individuals presenting with 7689 episodes of self-harm during a 3-month audit period between 2010 and 2011. OUTCOME: Self-harm episodes, key aspects of individual management relating to psychosocial assessment and follow-up, and a 21-item measure of service quality. RESULTS: Overall, 56% (3583/6442) of individuals were women and 51% (3274/6442) were aged under 35 years. Hospitals varied markedly in their management. The proportion of episodes that received a psychosocial assessment by a mental health professional ranged from 22% to 88% (median 58%, IQR 48–70%); the proportion of episodes resulting in admission to general hospitals varied from 22% to 85% (median 54%, IQR 41–63%); a referral for specialist mental health follow-up was made in 11–64% of episodes (median 28%, IQR 22–38%); a referral to non-statutory services was made in 4–62% of episodes (median 15%, IQR 8–23%); 0–21% of episodes resulted in psychiatric admission (median 7%, QR 4–12%). The specialist assessment rate varied by method of harm; the median rate for self-cutting was 45% (IQR 28–63%) vs 58% (IQR 48–73%) for self-poisoning. Compared with the 2001 study, there was little difference in the proportion of episodes receiving specialist assessment; there was a significant increase in general hospital admission but a decrease in referrals for specialist mental health follow-up. However, scores on the service quality scale had increased from a median of 11.5–14.5 (a 26% increase). CONCLUSIONS: Services for the hospital management of self-harm remain variable despite national guidelines and policy initiatives. We found no evidence for increasing levels of assessment over time but markers of service quality may have improved. This paper forms part of the study ‘Variations in self-harm service delivery: an observational study examining outcomes and temporal trends’. The National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) Portfolio database registration number: HOMASH 2 (7333). The NIHR Coordinated System for gaining NHS Permission (CSP) registration number: 23226.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3840333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38403332013-11-26 Are hospital services for self-harm getting better? An observational study examining management, service provision and temporal trends in England Cooper, J Steeg, S Bennewith, O Lowe, M Gunnell, D House, A Hawton, K Kapur, N BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics and management of individuals attending hospital with self-harm and assess changes in management and service quality since an earlier study in 2001, a period in which national guidance has been available. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: A stratified random sample of 32 hospitals in England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 6442 individuals presenting with 7689 episodes of self-harm during a 3-month audit period between 2010 and 2011. OUTCOME: Self-harm episodes, key aspects of individual management relating to psychosocial assessment and follow-up, and a 21-item measure of service quality. RESULTS: Overall, 56% (3583/6442) of individuals were women and 51% (3274/6442) were aged under 35 years. Hospitals varied markedly in their management. The proportion of episodes that received a psychosocial assessment by a mental health professional ranged from 22% to 88% (median 58%, IQR 48–70%); the proportion of episodes resulting in admission to general hospitals varied from 22% to 85% (median 54%, IQR 41–63%); a referral for specialist mental health follow-up was made in 11–64% of episodes (median 28%, IQR 22–38%); a referral to non-statutory services was made in 4–62% of episodes (median 15%, IQR 8–23%); 0–21% of episodes resulted in psychiatric admission (median 7%, QR 4–12%). The specialist assessment rate varied by method of harm; the median rate for self-cutting was 45% (IQR 28–63%) vs 58% (IQR 48–73%) for self-poisoning. Compared with the 2001 study, there was little difference in the proportion of episodes receiving specialist assessment; there was a significant increase in general hospital admission but a decrease in referrals for specialist mental health follow-up. However, scores on the service quality scale had increased from a median of 11.5–14.5 (a 26% increase). CONCLUSIONS: Services for the hospital management of self-harm remain variable despite national guidelines and policy initiatives. We found no evidence for increasing levels of assessment over time but markers of service quality may have improved. This paper forms part of the study ‘Variations in self-harm service delivery: an observational study examining outcomes and temporal trends’. The National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) Portfolio database registration number: HOMASH 2 (7333). The NIHR Coordinated System for gaining NHS Permission (CSP) registration number: 23226. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3840333/ /pubmed/24253029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003444 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Cooper, J
Steeg, S
Bennewith, O
Lowe, M
Gunnell, D
House, A
Hawton, K
Kapur, N
Are hospital services for self-harm getting better? An observational study examining management, service provision and temporal trends in England
title Are hospital services for self-harm getting better? An observational study examining management, service provision and temporal trends in England
title_full Are hospital services for self-harm getting better? An observational study examining management, service provision and temporal trends in England
title_fullStr Are hospital services for self-harm getting better? An observational study examining management, service provision and temporal trends in England
title_full_unstemmed Are hospital services for self-harm getting better? An observational study examining management, service provision and temporal trends in England
title_short Are hospital services for self-harm getting better? An observational study examining management, service provision and temporal trends in England
title_sort are hospital services for self-harm getting better? an observational study examining management, service provision and temporal trends in england
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3840333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24253029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003444
work_keys_str_mv AT cooperj arehospitalservicesforselfharmgettingbetteranobservationalstudyexaminingmanagementserviceprovisionandtemporaltrendsinengland
AT steegs arehospitalservicesforselfharmgettingbetteranobservationalstudyexaminingmanagementserviceprovisionandtemporaltrendsinengland
AT bennewitho arehospitalservicesforselfharmgettingbetteranobservationalstudyexaminingmanagementserviceprovisionandtemporaltrendsinengland
AT lowem arehospitalservicesforselfharmgettingbetteranobservationalstudyexaminingmanagementserviceprovisionandtemporaltrendsinengland
AT gunnelld arehospitalservicesforselfharmgettingbetteranobservationalstudyexaminingmanagementserviceprovisionandtemporaltrendsinengland
AT housea arehospitalservicesforselfharmgettingbetteranobservationalstudyexaminingmanagementserviceprovisionandtemporaltrendsinengland
AT hawtonk arehospitalservicesforselfharmgettingbetteranobservationalstudyexaminingmanagementserviceprovisionandtemporaltrendsinengland
AT kapurn arehospitalservicesforselfharmgettingbetteranobservationalstudyexaminingmanagementserviceprovisionandtemporaltrendsinengland