Cargando…
Gene aberrations of RRM1 and RRM2B and outcome of advanced breast cancer after treatment with docetaxel with or without gemcitabine
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate whether copy number changes of the genes encoding the ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1) and/or subunit M2B (RRM2B) predict sensitivity to gemcitabine administered in combination with docetaxel compared to single ag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3840598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24215511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-541 |
_version_ | 1782478531659300864 |
---|---|
author | Jørgensen, Charlotte LT Ejlertsen, Bent Bjerre, Karsten D Balslev, Eva Nielsen, Dorte L Nielsen, Kirsten V |
author_facet | Jørgensen, Charlotte LT Ejlertsen, Bent Bjerre, Karsten D Balslev, Eva Nielsen, Dorte L Nielsen, Kirsten V |
author_sort | Jørgensen, Charlotte LT |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate whether copy number changes of the genes encoding the ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1) and/or subunit M2B (RRM2B) predict sensitivity to gemcitabine administered in combination with docetaxel compared to single agent docetaxel in advanced breast cancer patients. METHODS: Primary tumor samples from patients randomly assigned to gemcitabine plus docetaxel or docetaxel alone were analyzed for RRM1 and RRM2B copy number changes using Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) technology with probes covering respectively RRM1 at 11p15.5 and a reference probe covering the centromere of chromosome 11 (CEN-11), and RRM2B at 8q22.3 and a reference probe covering the centromere of chromosome 8 (CEN-8). The assays were validated in a material of 60 normal breast samples. Time to progression (TTP) was the primary endpoint. Overall survival (OS) and response rate (RR) were secondary endpoints. Associations between RRM1/CEN-11 and/or RRM2B/CEN-8 ratios and time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. Heterogeneity of treatment effects on TTP and OS according to gene status were investigated by subgroup analyses, and the Wald test was applied. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: FISH analysis for both RRM1 and RRM2B was successful in 251 patients. RRM1 and RRM2B aberrations (deletions and amplifications) were observed in 15.9% and 13.6% of patients, respectively. RRM1 aberrations were associated with a decreased OS in the time interval 1.5-7.4 years (hazard ratio = 1.72, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-2.79, P = 0.03). RRM2B aberrations alone or in combination with RRM1 aberrations had no prognostic impact in terms of TTP or OS. RR was not different by gene status. No significant differences were detected in TTP or OS within subgroups according to gene status and chemotherapy regimen. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the presence of RRM1 and RRM2B copy number changes in primary breast tumor specimens. Nevertheless, we found no support of the hypothesis that aberrations of RRM1 or RRM2B, neither individually nor in combination, are associated with an altered clinical outcome following chemotherapy with gemcitabine in combination with docetaxel compared to docetaxel alone in advanced breast cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3840598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38405982013-11-27 Gene aberrations of RRM1 and RRM2B and outcome of advanced breast cancer after treatment with docetaxel with or without gemcitabine Jørgensen, Charlotte LT Ejlertsen, Bent Bjerre, Karsten D Balslev, Eva Nielsen, Dorte L Nielsen, Kirsten V BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate whether copy number changes of the genes encoding the ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1) and/or subunit M2B (RRM2B) predict sensitivity to gemcitabine administered in combination with docetaxel compared to single agent docetaxel in advanced breast cancer patients. METHODS: Primary tumor samples from patients randomly assigned to gemcitabine plus docetaxel or docetaxel alone were analyzed for RRM1 and RRM2B copy number changes using Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) technology with probes covering respectively RRM1 at 11p15.5 and a reference probe covering the centromere of chromosome 11 (CEN-11), and RRM2B at 8q22.3 and a reference probe covering the centromere of chromosome 8 (CEN-8). The assays were validated in a material of 60 normal breast samples. Time to progression (TTP) was the primary endpoint. Overall survival (OS) and response rate (RR) were secondary endpoints. Associations between RRM1/CEN-11 and/or RRM2B/CEN-8 ratios and time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. Heterogeneity of treatment effects on TTP and OS according to gene status were investigated by subgroup analyses, and the Wald test was applied. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: FISH analysis for both RRM1 and RRM2B was successful in 251 patients. RRM1 and RRM2B aberrations (deletions and amplifications) were observed in 15.9% and 13.6% of patients, respectively. RRM1 aberrations were associated with a decreased OS in the time interval 1.5-7.4 years (hazard ratio = 1.72, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-2.79, P = 0.03). RRM2B aberrations alone or in combination with RRM1 aberrations had no prognostic impact in terms of TTP or OS. RR was not different by gene status. No significant differences were detected in TTP or OS within subgroups according to gene status and chemotherapy regimen. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the presence of RRM1 and RRM2B copy number changes in primary breast tumor specimens. Nevertheless, we found no support of the hypothesis that aberrations of RRM1 or RRM2B, neither individually nor in combination, are associated with an altered clinical outcome following chemotherapy with gemcitabine in combination with docetaxel compared to docetaxel alone in advanced breast cancer patients. BioMed Central 2013-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3840598/ /pubmed/24215511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-541 Text en Copyright © 2013 Jørgensen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jørgensen, Charlotte LT Ejlertsen, Bent Bjerre, Karsten D Balslev, Eva Nielsen, Dorte L Nielsen, Kirsten V Gene aberrations of RRM1 and RRM2B and outcome of advanced breast cancer after treatment with docetaxel with or without gemcitabine |
title | Gene aberrations of RRM1 and RRM2B and outcome of advanced breast cancer after treatment with docetaxel with or without gemcitabine |
title_full | Gene aberrations of RRM1 and RRM2B and outcome of advanced breast cancer after treatment with docetaxel with or without gemcitabine |
title_fullStr | Gene aberrations of RRM1 and RRM2B and outcome of advanced breast cancer after treatment with docetaxel with or without gemcitabine |
title_full_unstemmed | Gene aberrations of RRM1 and RRM2B and outcome of advanced breast cancer after treatment with docetaxel with or without gemcitabine |
title_short | Gene aberrations of RRM1 and RRM2B and outcome of advanced breast cancer after treatment with docetaxel with or without gemcitabine |
title_sort | gene aberrations of rrm1 and rrm2b and outcome of advanced breast cancer after treatment with docetaxel with or without gemcitabine |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3840598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24215511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-541 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jørgensencharlottelt geneaberrationsofrrm1andrrm2bandoutcomeofadvancedbreastcanceraftertreatmentwithdocetaxelwithorwithoutgemcitabine AT ejlertsenbent geneaberrationsofrrm1andrrm2bandoutcomeofadvancedbreastcanceraftertreatmentwithdocetaxelwithorwithoutgemcitabine AT bjerrekarstend geneaberrationsofrrm1andrrm2bandoutcomeofadvancedbreastcanceraftertreatmentwithdocetaxelwithorwithoutgemcitabine AT balsleveva geneaberrationsofrrm1andrrm2bandoutcomeofadvancedbreastcanceraftertreatmentwithdocetaxelwithorwithoutgemcitabine AT nielsendortel geneaberrationsofrrm1andrrm2bandoutcomeofadvancedbreastcanceraftertreatmentwithdocetaxelwithorwithoutgemcitabine AT nielsenkirstenv geneaberrationsofrrm1andrrm2bandoutcomeofadvancedbreastcanceraftertreatmentwithdocetaxelwithorwithoutgemcitabine |