Cargando…

A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is the most frequently seen long term complication after laparotomy causing much morbidity and even mortality. The overall incidence remains 11-20%, despite studies attempting to optimize closing techniques. Two patient groups, patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nieuwenhuizen, Jeroen, Eker, Hasan H, Timmermans, Lucas, Hop, Wim CJ, Kleinrensink, Gert-Jan, Jeekel, Johannes, Lange, Johan F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3840708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24499111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-48
_version_ 1782478556206465024
author Nieuwenhuizen, Jeroen
Eker, Hasan H
Timmermans, Lucas
Hop, Wim CJ
Kleinrensink, Gert-Jan
Jeekel, Johannes
Lange, Johan F
author_facet Nieuwenhuizen, Jeroen
Eker, Hasan H
Timmermans, Lucas
Hop, Wim CJ
Kleinrensink, Gert-Jan
Jeekel, Johannes
Lange, Johan F
author_sort Nieuwenhuizen, Jeroen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is the most frequently seen long term complication after laparotomy causing much morbidity and even mortality. The overall incidence remains 11-20%, despite studies attempting to optimize closing techniques. Two patient groups, patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and obese patients, have a risk for incisional hernia after laparotomy of more than 30%. These patients might benefit from mesh augmented midline closure as a means to reduce incisional hernia incidence. METHODS/DESIGN: The PRImary Mesh Closure of Abdominal Midline Wound (PRIMA) trial is a double-blinded international multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing running slowly absorbable suture closure with the same closure augmented with a sublay or onlay mesh. Primary endpoint will be incisional hernia incidence 2 years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes will be postoperative complications, pain, quality of life and cost effectiveness. A total of 460 patients will be included in three arms of the study and randomized between running suture closure, onlay mesh closure or sublay mesh closure. Follow-up will be at 1, 3, 12 and 24 months with ultrasound imaging performed at 6 and 24 months to objectify the presence of incisional hernia. Patients, investigators and radiologists will be blinded throughout the whole follow up. DISCCUSION: The use of prosthetic mesh has proven effective and safe in incisional hernia surgery however its use in a prophylactic manner has yet to be properly investigated. The PRIMA trial will provide level 1b evidence whether mesh augmented midline abdominal closure reduces incisional hernia incidence in high risk groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial.gov NCT00761475.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3840708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38407082013-11-27 A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence Nieuwenhuizen, Jeroen Eker, Hasan H Timmermans, Lucas Hop, Wim CJ Kleinrensink, Gert-Jan Jeekel, Johannes Lange, Johan F BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is the most frequently seen long term complication after laparotomy causing much morbidity and even mortality. The overall incidence remains 11-20%, despite studies attempting to optimize closing techniques. Two patient groups, patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and obese patients, have a risk for incisional hernia after laparotomy of more than 30%. These patients might benefit from mesh augmented midline closure as a means to reduce incisional hernia incidence. METHODS/DESIGN: The PRImary Mesh Closure of Abdominal Midline Wound (PRIMA) trial is a double-blinded international multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing running slowly absorbable suture closure with the same closure augmented with a sublay or onlay mesh. Primary endpoint will be incisional hernia incidence 2 years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes will be postoperative complications, pain, quality of life and cost effectiveness. A total of 460 patients will be included in three arms of the study and randomized between running suture closure, onlay mesh closure or sublay mesh closure. Follow-up will be at 1, 3, 12 and 24 months with ultrasound imaging performed at 6 and 24 months to objectify the presence of incisional hernia. Patients, investigators and radiologists will be blinded throughout the whole follow up. DISCCUSION: The use of prosthetic mesh has proven effective and safe in incisional hernia surgery however its use in a prophylactic manner has yet to be properly investigated. The PRIMA trial will provide level 1b evidence whether mesh augmented midline abdominal closure reduces incisional hernia incidence in high risk groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial.gov NCT00761475. BioMed Central 2013-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3840708/ /pubmed/24499111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-48 Text en Copyright © 2013 Nieuwenhuizen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Nieuwenhuizen, Jeroen
Eker, Hasan H
Timmermans, Lucas
Hop, Wim CJ
Kleinrensink, Gert-Jan
Jeekel, Johannes
Lange, Johan F
A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence
title A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence
title_full A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence
title_fullStr A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence
title_full_unstemmed A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence
title_short A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence
title_sort double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3840708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24499111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-48
work_keys_str_mv AT nieuwenhuizenjeroen adoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingprimarysutureclosurewithmeshaugmentedclosuretoreduceincisionalherniaincidence
AT ekerhasanh adoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingprimarysutureclosurewithmeshaugmentedclosuretoreduceincisionalherniaincidence
AT timmermanslucas adoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingprimarysutureclosurewithmeshaugmentedclosuretoreduceincisionalherniaincidence
AT hopwimcj adoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingprimarysutureclosurewithmeshaugmentedclosuretoreduceincisionalherniaincidence
AT kleinrensinkgertjan adoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingprimarysutureclosurewithmeshaugmentedclosuretoreduceincisionalherniaincidence
AT jeekeljohannes adoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingprimarysutureclosurewithmeshaugmentedclosuretoreduceincisionalherniaincidence
AT langejohanf adoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingprimarysutureclosurewithmeshaugmentedclosuretoreduceincisionalherniaincidence
AT nieuwenhuizenjeroen doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingprimarysutureclosurewithmeshaugmentedclosuretoreduceincisionalherniaincidence
AT ekerhasanh doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingprimarysutureclosurewithmeshaugmentedclosuretoreduceincisionalherniaincidence
AT timmermanslucas doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingprimarysutureclosurewithmeshaugmentedclosuretoreduceincisionalherniaincidence
AT hopwimcj doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingprimarysutureclosurewithmeshaugmentedclosuretoreduceincisionalherniaincidence
AT kleinrensinkgertjan doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingprimarysutureclosurewithmeshaugmentedclosuretoreduceincisionalherniaincidence
AT jeekeljohannes doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingprimarysutureclosurewithmeshaugmentedclosuretoreduceincisionalherniaincidence
AT langejohanf doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingprimarysutureclosurewithmeshaugmentedclosuretoreduceincisionalherniaincidence