Cargando…

Comparison of Three Interview Methods on Response Pattern to Sensitive and Non-Sensitive Questions

BACKGROUND: To get more precise responses when gathering information about sensitive topics such as drug use, it is important to use the most optimal method. OBJECTIVES: This study was carried out to address the impact of three interview methods (street-based, household, and telephone interviews) on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akbar Haghdoost, Ali, Reza Baneshi, Mohammad, Eybpoosh, Sana, Khajehkazemi, Razieh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3840838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349749
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.7673
_version_ 1782478566955417600
author Akbar Haghdoost, Ali
Reza Baneshi, Mohammad
Eybpoosh, Sana
Khajehkazemi, Razieh
author_facet Akbar Haghdoost, Ali
Reza Baneshi, Mohammad
Eybpoosh, Sana
Khajehkazemi, Razieh
author_sort Akbar Haghdoost, Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To get more precise responses when gathering information about sensitive topics such as drug use, it is important to use the most optimal method. OBJECTIVES: This study was carried out to address the impact of three interview methods (street-based, household, and telephone interviews) on response pattern to sensitive and non-sensitive questions in terms of participation, disclosure and discontinuing rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We selected three culturally diverse major cities of Iran. Then, we randomly selected 300 subjects, 100 for each type of interview, from each major city (899 in total). For street-based interviews only pedestrians who were walking alone were recruited, for household interviews only one individual from each house participated (3-4 houses in each alley were selected), and for telephone interviews we selected phone numbers using a random number list. We asked five non-sensitive and five sensitive (related to drug use and sexual contact among their personal network) questions. RESULTS: For telephone and household interviews, relative to street-based interviews, participants were less likely to disclose alcohol and drug-related behaviors (Adjusted OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.60- 0.97) and sexual behaviors among their network (Adjusted OR telephone/street-based = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.39- 1.07 and Adjusted OR household/ street-based = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.33- 0.95). We found that participants who were interviewed via the telephone were more likely (Adjusted OR = 1.24) and those who were interviewed at home were less likely (Adjusted OR = 0.86) to report non-sensitive information compared to participants who were interviewed on the street; however, these findings were not statistically significant. The largest participation rate and the least discontinuation rate were observed for household interviews. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that the methods of interview effect response to both sensitive and non-sensitive questions. We believe that for street-based interviews, respondents may disclose more sensitive information than telephone and household interviews.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3840838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38408382013-12-12 Comparison of Three Interview Methods on Response Pattern to Sensitive and Non-Sensitive Questions Akbar Haghdoost, Ali Reza Baneshi, Mohammad Eybpoosh, Sana Khajehkazemi, Razieh Iran Red Crescent Med J Research Article BACKGROUND: To get more precise responses when gathering information about sensitive topics such as drug use, it is important to use the most optimal method. OBJECTIVES: This study was carried out to address the impact of three interview methods (street-based, household, and telephone interviews) on response pattern to sensitive and non-sensitive questions in terms of participation, disclosure and discontinuing rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We selected three culturally diverse major cities of Iran. Then, we randomly selected 300 subjects, 100 for each type of interview, from each major city (899 in total). For street-based interviews only pedestrians who were walking alone were recruited, for household interviews only one individual from each house participated (3-4 houses in each alley were selected), and for telephone interviews we selected phone numbers using a random number list. We asked five non-sensitive and five sensitive (related to drug use and sexual contact among their personal network) questions. RESULTS: For telephone and household interviews, relative to street-based interviews, participants were less likely to disclose alcohol and drug-related behaviors (Adjusted OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.60- 0.97) and sexual behaviors among their network (Adjusted OR telephone/street-based = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.39- 1.07 and Adjusted OR household/ street-based = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.33- 0.95). We found that participants who were interviewed via the telephone were more likely (Adjusted OR = 1.24) and those who were interviewed at home were less likely (Adjusted OR = 0.86) to report non-sensitive information compared to participants who were interviewed on the street; however, these findings were not statistically significant. The largest participation rate and the least discontinuation rate were observed for household interviews. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that the methods of interview effect response to both sensitive and non-sensitive questions. We believe that for street-based interviews, respondents may disclose more sensitive information than telephone and household interviews. Kowsar 2013-06-05 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3840838/ /pubmed/24349749 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.7673 Text en Copyright © 2013, Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Akbar Haghdoost, Ali
Reza Baneshi, Mohammad
Eybpoosh, Sana
Khajehkazemi, Razieh
Comparison of Three Interview Methods on Response Pattern to Sensitive and Non-Sensitive Questions
title Comparison of Three Interview Methods on Response Pattern to Sensitive and Non-Sensitive Questions
title_full Comparison of Three Interview Methods on Response Pattern to Sensitive and Non-Sensitive Questions
title_fullStr Comparison of Three Interview Methods on Response Pattern to Sensitive and Non-Sensitive Questions
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Three Interview Methods on Response Pattern to Sensitive and Non-Sensitive Questions
title_short Comparison of Three Interview Methods on Response Pattern to Sensitive and Non-Sensitive Questions
title_sort comparison of three interview methods on response pattern to sensitive and non-sensitive questions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3840838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349749
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.7673
work_keys_str_mv AT akbarhaghdoostali comparisonofthreeinterviewmethodsonresponsepatterntosensitiveandnonsensitivequestions
AT rezabaneshimohammad comparisonofthreeinterviewmethodsonresponsepatterntosensitiveandnonsensitivequestions
AT eybpooshsana comparisonofthreeinterviewmethodsonresponsepatterntosensitiveandnonsensitivequestions
AT khajehkazemirazieh comparisonofthreeinterviewmethodsonresponsepatterntosensitiveandnonsensitivequestions