Cargando…

The manipulation of strain, when stress is controlled, modulates in vivo tendon mechanical properties but not systemic TGF-β1 levels

Modulators of loading-induced in vivo adaptations in muscle–tendon complex (MTC) mechanical properties remain unclear. Similarly contentious, is whether changes in MTC characteristics are associated with growth factor levels. Four groups were subjected to varying magnitudes of stress/strain: Group 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMahon, Gerard E, Morse, Christopher I, Burden, Adrian, Winwood, Keith, Onambélé-Pearson, Gladys L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24303165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.91
_version_ 1782478587806351360
author McMahon, Gerard E
Morse, Christopher I
Burden, Adrian
Winwood, Keith
Onambélé-Pearson, Gladys L
author_facet McMahon, Gerard E
Morse, Christopher I
Burden, Adrian
Winwood, Keith
Onambélé-Pearson, Gladys L
author_sort McMahon, Gerard E
collection PubMed
description Modulators of loading-induced in vivo adaptations in muscle–tendon complex (MTC) mechanical properties remain unclear. Similarly contentious, is whether changes in MTC characteristics are associated with growth factor levels. Four groups were subjected to varying magnitudes of stress/strain: Group 1 trained with the MTC at a shortened position (MTCS; n = 10); Group 2 at a lengthened position (MTCL; n = 11; stress levels matched to MTCS); Group 3 over a wide range of motion (MTCX; n = 11); and Group 4 (n = 10) was the control population (no training). Patella tendon Stiffness (P < 0.001), Young's modulus, and quadriceps torque (P < 0.05) increments (only seen in the training groups), showed MTCL and MTCX groups responses to be superior to those of MTCS (P < 0.05). In addition, MTCL and MTCX better maintained adaptations compared to MTCS (P < 0.05) following detraining, with a pattern of slower loss of improvements at the early phase of detraining in all training groups. There were no significant changes (P > 0.05) in antagonist cocontraction, patella tendon dimensions or circulating transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β1) levels following training or detraining in any of the groups. We conclude that chronically loading the MTC in a relatively lengthened position (which involves greater strains) enhances its mechanical properties, more so than loading in a shortened position. This is true even after normalizing for internal stress. The underlying endocrine mechanisms do not appear to be mediated via TGF-β1, at least not at the systemic level. Our findings have implications with regard to the effectiveness of eccentric loading on improved tendon structural and mechanical properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3841029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38410292013-12-03 The manipulation of strain, when stress is controlled, modulates in vivo tendon mechanical properties but not systemic TGF-β1 levels McMahon, Gerard E Morse, Christopher I Burden, Adrian Winwood, Keith Onambélé-Pearson, Gladys L Physiol Rep Original Research Modulators of loading-induced in vivo adaptations in muscle–tendon complex (MTC) mechanical properties remain unclear. Similarly contentious, is whether changes in MTC characteristics are associated with growth factor levels. Four groups were subjected to varying magnitudes of stress/strain: Group 1 trained with the MTC at a shortened position (MTCS; n = 10); Group 2 at a lengthened position (MTCL; n = 11; stress levels matched to MTCS); Group 3 over a wide range of motion (MTCX; n = 11); and Group 4 (n = 10) was the control population (no training). Patella tendon Stiffness (P < 0.001), Young's modulus, and quadriceps torque (P < 0.05) increments (only seen in the training groups), showed MTCL and MTCX groups responses to be superior to those of MTCS (P < 0.05). In addition, MTCL and MTCX better maintained adaptations compared to MTCS (P < 0.05) following detraining, with a pattern of slower loss of improvements at the early phase of detraining in all training groups. There were no significant changes (P > 0.05) in antagonist cocontraction, patella tendon dimensions or circulating transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β1) levels following training or detraining in any of the groups. We conclude that chronically loading the MTC in a relatively lengthened position (which involves greater strains) enhances its mechanical properties, more so than loading in a shortened position. This is true even after normalizing for internal stress. The underlying endocrine mechanisms do not appear to be mediated via TGF-β1, at least not at the systemic level. Our findings have implications with regard to the effectiveness of eccentric loading on improved tendon structural and mechanical properties. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-10 2013-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3841029/ /pubmed/24303165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.91 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Research
McMahon, Gerard E
Morse, Christopher I
Burden, Adrian
Winwood, Keith
Onambélé-Pearson, Gladys L
The manipulation of strain, when stress is controlled, modulates in vivo tendon mechanical properties but not systemic TGF-β1 levels
title The manipulation of strain, when stress is controlled, modulates in vivo tendon mechanical properties but not systemic TGF-β1 levels
title_full The manipulation of strain, when stress is controlled, modulates in vivo tendon mechanical properties but not systemic TGF-β1 levels
title_fullStr The manipulation of strain, when stress is controlled, modulates in vivo tendon mechanical properties but not systemic TGF-β1 levels
title_full_unstemmed The manipulation of strain, when stress is controlled, modulates in vivo tendon mechanical properties but not systemic TGF-β1 levels
title_short The manipulation of strain, when stress is controlled, modulates in vivo tendon mechanical properties but not systemic TGF-β1 levels
title_sort manipulation of strain, when stress is controlled, modulates in vivo tendon mechanical properties but not systemic tgf-β1 levels
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24303165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.91
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmahongerarde themanipulationofstrainwhenstressiscontrolledmodulatesinvivotendonmechanicalpropertiesbutnotsystemictgfb1levels
AT morsechristopheri themanipulationofstrainwhenstressiscontrolledmodulatesinvivotendonmechanicalpropertiesbutnotsystemictgfb1levels
AT burdenadrian themanipulationofstrainwhenstressiscontrolledmodulatesinvivotendonmechanicalpropertiesbutnotsystemictgfb1levels
AT winwoodkeith themanipulationofstrainwhenstressiscontrolledmodulatesinvivotendonmechanicalpropertiesbutnotsystemictgfb1levels
AT onambelepearsongladysl themanipulationofstrainwhenstressiscontrolledmodulatesinvivotendonmechanicalpropertiesbutnotsystemictgfb1levels
AT mcmahongerarde manipulationofstrainwhenstressiscontrolledmodulatesinvivotendonmechanicalpropertiesbutnotsystemictgfb1levels
AT morsechristopheri manipulationofstrainwhenstressiscontrolledmodulatesinvivotendonmechanicalpropertiesbutnotsystemictgfb1levels
AT burdenadrian manipulationofstrainwhenstressiscontrolledmodulatesinvivotendonmechanicalpropertiesbutnotsystemictgfb1levels
AT winwoodkeith manipulationofstrainwhenstressiscontrolledmodulatesinvivotendonmechanicalpropertiesbutnotsystemictgfb1levels
AT onambelepearsongladysl manipulationofstrainwhenstressiscontrolledmodulatesinvivotendonmechanicalpropertiesbutnotsystemictgfb1levels