Cargando…

Use of the HR index to predict maximal oxygen uptake during different exercise protocols

This study examined the ability of the HR(index) model to accurately predict maximal oxygen uptake ([Image: see text]O(2max)) across a variety of incremental exercise protocols. Ten men completed five incremental protocols to volitional exhaustion. Protocols included three treadmill (Bruce, UCLA run...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haller, Jeannie M, Fehling, Patricia C, Barr, David A, Storer, Thomas W, Cooper, Christopher B, Smith, Denise L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24303190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.124
_version_ 1782478593873412096
author Haller, Jeannie M
Fehling, Patricia C
Barr, David A
Storer, Thomas W
Cooper, Christopher B
Smith, Denise L
author_facet Haller, Jeannie M
Fehling, Patricia C
Barr, David A
Storer, Thomas W
Cooper, Christopher B
Smith, Denise L
author_sort Haller, Jeannie M
collection PubMed
description This study examined the ability of the HR(index) model to accurately predict maximal oxygen uptake ([Image: see text]O(2max)) across a variety of incremental exercise protocols. Ten men completed five incremental protocols to volitional exhaustion. Protocols included three treadmill (Bruce, UCLA running, Wellness Fitness Initiative [WFI]), one cycle, and one field (shuttle) test. The HR(index) prediction equation (METs = 6 × HR(index) − 5, where HR(index) = HR(max)/HR(rest)) was used to generate estimates of energy expenditure, which were converted to body mass-specific estimates of [Image: see text]O(2max). Estimated [Image: see text]O(2max) was compared with measured [Image: see text]O(2max). Across all protocols, the HR(index) model significantly underestimated [Image: see text]O(2max) by 5.1 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1) (95% CI: −7.4, −2.7) and the standard error of the estimate (SEE) was 6.7 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1). Accuracy of the model was protocol-dependent, with [Image: see text]O(2max) significantly underestimated for the Bruce and WFI protocols but not the UCLA, Cycle, or Shuttle protocols. Although no significant differences in [Image: see text]O(2max) estimates were identified for these three protocols, predictive accuracy among them was not high, with root mean squared errors and SEEs ranging from 7.6 to 10.3 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1) and from 4.5 to 8.0 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1), respectively. Correlations between measured and predicted [Image: see text]O(2max) were between 0.27 and 0.53. Individual prediction errors indicated that prediction accuracy varied considerably within protocols and among participants. In conclusion, across various protocols the HR(index) model significantly underestimated [Image: see text]O(2max) in a group of aerobically fit young men. Estimates generated using the model did not differ from measured [Image: see text]O(2max) for three of the five protocols studied; nevertheless, some individual prediction errors were large. The lack of precision among estimates may limit the utility of the HR(index) model; however, further investigation to establish the model's predictive accuracy is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3841054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38410542013-12-03 Use of the HR index to predict maximal oxygen uptake during different exercise protocols Haller, Jeannie M Fehling, Patricia C Barr, David A Storer, Thomas W Cooper, Christopher B Smith, Denise L Physiol Rep Original Research This study examined the ability of the HR(index) model to accurately predict maximal oxygen uptake ([Image: see text]O(2max)) across a variety of incremental exercise protocols. Ten men completed five incremental protocols to volitional exhaustion. Protocols included three treadmill (Bruce, UCLA running, Wellness Fitness Initiative [WFI]), one cycle, and one field (shuttle) test. The HR(index) prediction equation (METs = 6 × HR(index) − 5, where HR(index) = HR(max)/HR(rest)) was used to generate estimates of energy expenditure, which were converted to body mass-specific estimates of [Image: see text]O(2max). Estimated [Image: see text]O(2max) was compared with measured [Image: see text]O(2max). Across all protocols, the HR(index) model significantly underestimated [Image: see text]O(2max) by 5.1 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1) (95% CI: −7.4, −2.7) and the standard error of the estimate (SEE) was 6.7 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1). Accuracy of the model was protocol-dependent, with [Image: see text]O(2max) significantly underestimated for the Bruce and WFI protocols but not the UCLA, Cycle, or Shuttle protocols. Although no significant differences in [Image: see text]O(2max) estimates were identified for these three protocols, predictive accuracy among them was not high, with root mean squared errors and SEEs ranging from 7.6 to 10.3 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1) and from 4.5 to 8.0 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1), respectively. Correlations between measured and predicted [Image: see text]O(2max) were between 0.27 and 0.53. Individual prediction errors indicated that prediction accuracy varied considerably within protocols and among participants. In conclusion, across various protocols the HR(index) model significantly underestimated [Image: see text]O(2max) in a group of aerobically fit young men. Estimates generated using the model did not differ from measured [Image: see text]O(2max) for three of the five protocols studied; nevertheless, some individual prediction errors were large. The lack of precision among estimates may limit the utility of the HR(index) model; however, further investigation to establish the model's predictive accuracy is warranted. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-10 2013-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3841054/ /pubmed/24303190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.124 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Research
Haller, Jeannie M
Fehling, Patricia C
Barr, David A
Storer, Thomas W
Cooper, Christopher B
Smith, Denise L
Use of the HR index to predict maximal oxygen uptake during different exercise protocols
title Use of the HR index to predict maximal oxygen uptake during different exercise protocols
title_full Use of the HR index to predict maximal oxygen uptake during different exercise protocols
title_fullStr Use of the HR index to predict maximal oxygen uptake during different exercise protocols
title_full_unstemmed Use of the HR index to predict maximal oxygen uptake during different exercise protocols
title_short Use of the HR index to predict maximal oxygen uptake during different exercise protocols
title_sort use of the hr index to predict maximal oxygen uptake during different exercise protocols
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24303190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.124
work_keys_str_mv AT hallerjeanniem useofthehrindextopredictmaximaloxygenuptakeduringdifferentexerciseprotocols
AT fehlingpatriciac useofthehrindextopredictmaximaloxygenuptakeduringdifferentexerciseprotocols
AT barrdavida useofthehrindextopredictmaximaloxygenuptakeduringdifferentexerciseprotocols
AT storerthomasw useofthehrindextopredictmaximaloxygenuptakeduringdifferentexerciseprotocols
AT cooperchristopherb useofthehrindextopredictmaximaloxygenuptakeduringdifferentexerciseprotocols
AT smithdenisel useofthehrindextopredictmaximaloxygenuptakeduringdifferentexerciseprotocols