Cargando…

Patients’ Reported Reasons for Non-Use of an Internet-Based Patient-Provider Communication Service: Qualitative Interview Study

BACKGROUND: The adoption of Internet-based patient–provider communication services (IPPC) in health care has been slow. Patients want electronic communication, and the quality of health care can be improved by offering such IPPCs. However, the rate of enrollment in such services remains low, and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varsi, Cecilie, Gammon, Deede, Wibe, Torunn, Ruland, Cornelia M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24220233
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2683
_version_ 1782292772108107776
author Varsi, Cecilie
Gammon, Deede
Wibe, Torunn
Ruland, Cornelia M
author_facet Varsi, Cecilie
Gammon, Deede
Wibe, Torunn
Ruland, Cornelia M
author_sort Varsi, Cecilie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The adoption of Internet-based patient–provider communication services (IPPC) in health care has been slow. Patients want electronic communication, and the quality of health care can be improved by offering such IPPCs. However, the rate of enrollment in such services remains low, and the reasons for this are unclear. Knowledge about the barriers to use is valuable during implementation of IPPCs in the health care services, and it can help timing, targeting, and tailoring IPPCs to different groups of patients. OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to investigate patients’ views of an IPPC that they could use from home to pose questions to nurses and physicians at their treatment facility, and their reported reasons for non-use of the service. METHODS: This qualitative study was based on individual interviews with 22 patients who signed up for, but did not use, the IPPC. RESULTS: Patients appreciated the availability and the possibility of using the IPPC as needed, even if they did not use it. Their reported reasons for not using the IPPC fell into three main categories: (1) they felt that they did not need the IPPC and had sufficient access to information elsewhere, (2) they preferred other types of communication such as telephone or face-to-face contact, or (3) they were hindered by IPPC attributes such as login problems. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were satisfied with having the opportunity to send messages to health care providers through an IPPC, even if they did not use the service. IPPCs should be offered to the patients at an appropriate time in the illness trajectory, both when they need the service and when they are receptive to information about the service. A live demonstration of the IPPC at the point of enrollment might have increased its use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00971139; http://clinicaltrial.gov/ct2/show/NCT00971139 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6KlOiYJrW).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3841351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38413512013-11-27 Patients’ Reported Reasons for Non-Use of an Internet-Based Patient-Provider Communication Service: Qualitative Interview Study Varsi, Cecilie Gammon, Deede Wibe, Torunn Ruland, Cornelia M J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The adoption of Internet-based patient–provider communication services (IPPC) in health care has been slow. Patients want electronic communication, and the quality of health care can be improved by offering such IPPCs. However, the rate of enrollment in such services remains low, and the reasons for this are unclear. Knowledge about the barriers to use is valuable during implementation of IPPCs in the health care services, and it can help timing, targeting, and tailoring IPPCs to different groups of patients. OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to investigate patients’ views of an IPPC that they could use from home to pose questions to nurses and physicians at their treatment facility, and their reported reasons for non-use of the service. METHODS: This qualitative study was based on individual interviews with 22 patients who signed up for, but did not use, the IPPC. RESULTS: Patients appreciated the availability and the possibility of using the IPPC as needed, even if they did not use it. Their reported reasons for not using the IPPC fell into three main categories: (1) they felt that they did not need the IPPC and had sufficient access to information elsewhere, (2) they preferred other types of communication such as telephone or face-to-face contact, or (3) they were hindered by IPPC attributes such as login problems. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were satisfied with having the opportunity to send messages to health care providers through an IPPC, even if they did not use the service. IPPCs should be offered to the patients at an appropriate time in the illness trajectory, both when they need the service and when they are receptive to information about the service. A live demonstration of the IPPC at the point of enrollment might have increased its use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00971139; http://clinicaltrial.gov/ct2/show/NCT00971139 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6KlOiYJrW). JMIR Publications Inc. 2013-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3841351/ /pubmed/24220233 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2683 Text en ©Cecilie Varsi, Deede Gammon, Torunn Wibe, Cornelia M Ruland. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 11.11.2013. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Varsi, Cecilie
Gammon, Deede
Wibe, Torunn
Ruland, Cornelia M
Patients’ Reported Reasons for Non-Use of an Internet-Based Patient-Provider Communication Service: Qualitative Interview Study
title Patients’ Reported Reasons for Non-Use of an Internet-Based Patient-Provider Communication Service: Qualitative Interview Study
title_full Patients’ Reported Reasons for Non-Use of an Internet-Based Patient-Provider Communication Service: Qualitative Interview Study
title_fullStr Patients’ Reported Reasons for Non-Use of an Internet-Based Patient-Provider Communication Service: Qualitative Interview Study
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ Reported Reasons for Non-Use of an Internet-Based Patient-Provider Communication Service: Qualitative Interview Study
title_short Patients’ Reported Reasons for Non-Use of an Internet-Based Patient-Provider Communication Service: Qualitative Interview Study
title_sort patients’ reported reasons for non-use of an internet-based patient-provider communication service: qualitative interview study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24220233
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2683
work_keys_str_mv AT varsicecilie patientsreportedreasonsfornonuseofaninternetbasedpatientprovidercommunicationservicequalitativeinterviewstudy
AT gammondeede patientsreportedreasonsfornonuseofaninternetbasedpatientprovidercommunicationservicequalitativeinterviewstudy
AT wibetorunn patientsreportedreasonsfornonuseofaninternetbasedpatientprovidercommunicationservicequalitativeinterviewstudy
AT rulandcorneliam patientsreportedreasonsfornonuseofaninternetbasedpatientprovidercommunicationservicequalitativeinterviewstudy