Cargando…

Individual differences in transcranial electrical stimulation current density

Transcranial electrical stimulation (TCES) is effective in treating many conditions, but it has not been possible to accurately forecast current density within the complex anatomy of a given subject's head. We sought to predict and verify TCES current densities and determine the variability of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russell, Michael J, Goodman, Theodore, Pierson, Ronald, Shepherd, Shane, Wang, Qiang, Groshong, Bennett, Wiley, David F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial Department of Journal of Biomedical Research 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24285948
http://dx.doi.org/10.7555/JBR.27.20130074
_version_ 1782292780449529856
author Russell, Michael J
Goodman, Theodore
Pierson, Ronald
Shepherd, Shane
Wang, Qiang
Groshong, Bennett
Wiley, David F
author_facet Russell, Michael J
Goodman, Theodore
Pierson, Ronald
Shepherd, Shane
Wang, Qiang
Groshong, Bennett
Wiley, David F
author_sort Russell, Michael J
collection PubMed
description Transcranial electrical stimulation (TCES) is effective in treating many conditions, but it has not been possible to accurately forecast current density within the complex anatomy of a given subject's head. We sought to predict and verify TCES current densities and determine the variability of these current distributions in patient-specific models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. Two experiments were performed. The first experiment estimated conductivity from MRIs and compared the current density results against actual measurements from the scalp surface of 3 subjects. In the second experiment, virtual electrodes were placed on the scalps of 18 subjects to model simulated current densities with 2 mA of virtually applied stimulation. This procedure was repeated for 4 electrode locations. Current densities were then calculated for 75 brain regions. Comparison of modeled and measured external current in experiment 1 yielded a correlation of r = .93. In experiment 2, modeled individual differences were greatest near the electrodes (ten-fold differences were common), but simulated current was found in all regions of the brain. Sites that were distant from the electrodes (e.g. hypothalamus) typically showed two-fold individual differences. MRI-based modeling can effectively predict current densities in individual brains. Significant variation occurs between subjects with the same applied electrode configuration. Individualized MRI-based modeling should be considered in place of the 10-20 system when accurate TCES is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3841475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Editorial Department of Journal of Biomedical Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38414752013-11-27 Individual differences in transcranial electrical stimulation current density Russell, Michael J Goodman, Theodore Pierson, Ronald Shepherd, Shane Wang, Qiang Groshong, Bennett Wiley, David F J Biomed Res Research Paper Transcranial electrical stimulation (TCES) is effective in treating many conditions, but it has not been possible to accurately forecast current density within the complex anatomy of a given subject's head. We sought to predict and verify TCES current densities and determine the variability of these current distributions in patient-specific models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. Two experiments were performed. The first experiment estimated conductivity from MRIs and compared the current density results against actual measurements from the scalp surface of 3 subjects. In the second experiment, virtual electrodes were placed on the scalps of 18 subjects to model simulated current densities with 2 mA of virtually applied stimulation. This procedure was repeated for 4 electrode locations. Current densities were then calculated for 75 brain regions. Comparison of modeled and measured external current in experiment 1 yielded a correlation of r = .93. In experiment 2, modeled individual differences were greatest near the electrodes (ten-fold differences were common), but simulated current was found in all regions of the brain. Sites that were distant from the electrodes (e.g. hypothalamus) typically showed two-fold individual differences. MRI-based modeling can effectively predict current densities in individual brains. Significant variation occurs between subjects with the same applied electrode configuration. Individualized MRI-based modeling should be considered in place of the 10-20 system when accurate TCES is needed. Editorial Department of Journal of Biomedical Research 2013-11 2013-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3841475/ /pubmed/24285948 http://dx.doi.org/10.7555/JBR.27.20130074 Text en © 2013 by the Journal of Biomedical Research. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Russell, Michael J
Goodman, Theodore
Pierson, Ronald
Shepherd, Shane
Wang, Qiang
Groshong, Bennett
Wiley, David F
Individual differences in transcranial electrical stimulation current density
title Individual differences in transcranial electrical stimulation current density
title_full Individual differences in transcranial electrical stimulation current density
title_fullStr Individual differences in transcranial electrical stimulation current density
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in transcranial electrical stimulation current density
title_short Individual differences in transcranial electrical stimulation current density
title_sort individual differences in transcranial electrical stimulation current density
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24285948
http://dx.doi.org/10.7555/JBR.27.20130074
work_keys_str_mv AT russellmichaelj individualdifferencesintranscranialelectricalstimulationcurrentdensity
AT goodmantheodore individualdifferencesintranscranialelectricalstimulationcurrentdensity
AT piersonronald individualdifferencesintranscranialelectricalstimulationcurrentdensity
AT shepherdshane individualdifferencesintranscranialelectricalstimulationcurrentdensity
AT wangqiang individualdifferencesintranscranialelectricalstimulationcurrentdensity
AT groshongbennett individualdifferencesintranscranialelectricalstimulationcurrentdensity
AT wileydavidf individualdifferencesintranscranialelectricalstimulationcurrentdensity