Cargando…
Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice
BACKGROUND: Fibroscan is a quick, non-invasive technique used to measure liver stiffness (kPa), which correlates with fibrosis. To achieve a valid liver stiffness evaluation (LSE) the operator must obtain all the following three criteria: (1) ≥10 successful liver stiffness measurements; (2) IQR/medi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23924687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131640 |
_version_ | 1782292842831413248 |
---|---|
author | Armstrong, M J Corbett, C Hodson, J Marwah, N Parker, R Houlihan, D D Rowe, I A Hazlehurst, J M Brown, R Hübscher, S G Mutimer, D |
author_facet | Armstrong, M J Corbett, C Hodson, J Marwah, N Parker, R Houlihan, D D Rowe, I A Hazlehurst, J M Brown, R Hübscher, S G Mutimer, D |
author_sort | Armstrong, M J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fibroscan is a quick, non-invasive technique used to measure liver stiffness (kPa), which correlates with fibrosis. To achieve a valid liver stiffness evaluation (LSE) the operator must obtain all the following three criteria: (1) ≥10 successful liver stiffness measurements; (2) IQR/median ratio <0.30 and (3) ≥60% measurement success rate. OBJECTIVES: To assess the operator training requirements and the importance of adhering to the LSE validity criteria in routine clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the LSE validity rates of 2311 Fibroscans performed (1 August 2008 to 31 July 2011) in our tertiary liver outpatients department at the University Hospital Birmingham, UK. The diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan was assessed in 153 patients, by comparing LSE (valid and invalid) with the modified Ishak fibrosis stage on liver biopsy. RESULTS: Learning curve analysis highlighted that the greatest improvement in validity of LSE rates occurs in the operator’s first 10 Fibroscans, reaching 64.7% validity by the 50th Fibroscan. The correlation between LSE and the fibrosis stage on liver biopsy was superior in patients with a valid LSE (n=97) compared with those with an invalid LSE (n=56) (r(s) 0.577 vs 0.259; p=0.022). Area under receiving operating characteristics for significant fibrosis was greater when LSE was valid (0.83 vs 0.66; p=0.048). Using an LSE cut-off of 8 kPa, the negative predictive value of valid LSE was superior to invalid LSE for the detection of significant (84% vs 71%) and advanced fibrosis (100% vs 93%). CONCLUSIONS: Fibroscan requires minimal operator training (≥10 observed on patients), and when a valid LSE is obtained, it is an accurate tool for excluding advanced liver fibrosis. To ensure the diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan it is essential that the recommended LSE validity criteria are adhered to in routine clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3841754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38417542013-12-02 Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice Armstrong, M J Corbett, C Hodson, J Marwah, N Parker, R Houlihan, D D Rowe, I A Hazlehurst, J M Brown, R Hübscher, S G Mutimer, D Postgrad Med J Original Article BACKGROUND: Fibroscan is a quick, non-invasive technique used to measure liver stiffness (kPa), which correlates with fibrosis. To achieve a valid liver stiffness evaluation (LSE) the operator must obtain all the following three criteria: (1) ≥10 successful liver stiffness measurements; (2) IQR/median ratio <0.30 and (3) ≥60% measurement success rate. OBJECTIVES: To assess the operator training requirements and the importance of adhering to the LSE validity criteria in routine clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the LSE validity rates of 2311 Fibroscans performed (1 August 2008 to 31 July 2011) in our tertiary liver outpatients department at the University Hospital Birmingham, UK. The diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan was assessed in 153 patients, by comparing LSE (valid and invalid) with the modified Ishak fibrosis stage on liver biopsy. RESULTS: Learning curve analysis highlighted that the greatest improvement in validity of LSE rates occurs in the operator’s first 10 Fibroscans, reaching 64.7% validity by the 50th Fibroscan. The correlation between LSE and the fibrosis stage on liver biopsy was superior in patients with a valid LSE (n=97) compared with those with an invalid LSE (n=56) (r(s) 0.577 vs 0.259; p=0.022). Area under receiving operating characteristics for significant fibrosis was greater when LSE was valid (0.83 vs 0.66; p=0.048). Using an LSE cut-off of 8 kPa, the negative predictive value of valid LSE was superior to invalid LSE for the detection of significant (84% vs 71%) and advanced fibrosis (100% vs 93%). CONCLUSIONS: Fibroscan requires minimal operator training (≥10 observed on patients), and when a valid LSE is obtained, it is an accurate tool for excluding advanced liver fibrosis. To ensure the diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan it is essential that the recommended LSE validity criteria are adhered to in routine clinical practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-12 2013-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3841754/ /pubmed/23924687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131640 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Armstrong, M J Corbett, C Hodson, J Marwah, N Parker, R Houlihan, D D Rowe, I A Hazlehurst, J M Brown, R Hübscher, S G Mutimer, D Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice |
title | Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice |
title_full | Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice |
title_fullStr | Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice |
title_short | Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice |
title_sort | operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of fibroscan in routine clinical practice |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23924687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131640 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT armstrongmj operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice AT corbettc operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice AT hodsonj operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice AT marwahn operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice AT parkerr operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice AT houlihandd operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice AT roweia operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice AT hazlehurstjm operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice AT brownr operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice AT hubschersg operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice AT mutimerd operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice |