Cargando…

Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND: Fibroscan is a quick, non-invasive technique used to measure liver stiffness (kPa), which correlates with fibrosis. To achieve a valid liver stiffness evaluation (LSE) the operator must obtain all the following three criteria: (1) ≥10 successful liver stiffness measurements; (2) IQR/medi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armstrong, M J, Corbett, C, Hodson, J, Marwah, N, Parker, R, Houlihan, D D, Rowe, I A, Hazlehurst, J M, Brown, R, Hübscher, S G, Mutimer, D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23924687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131640
_version_ 1782292842831413248
author Armstrong, M J
Corbett, C
Hodson, J
Marwah, N
Parker, R
Houlihan, D D
Rowe, I A
Hazlehurst, J M
Brown, R
Hübscher, S G
Mutimer, D
author_facet Armstrong, M J
Corbett, C
Hodson, J
Marwah, N
Parker, R
Houlihan, D D
Rowe, I A
Hazlehurst, J M
Brown, R
Hübscher, S G
Mutimer, D
author_sort Armstrong, M J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fibroscan is a quick, non-invasive technique used to measure liver stiffness (kPa), which correlates with fibrosis. To achieve a valid liver stiffness evaluation (LSE) the operator must obtain all the following three criteria: (1) ≥10 successful liver stiffness measurements; (2) IQR/median ratio <0.30 and (3) ≥60% measurement success rate. OBJECTIVES: To assess the operator training requirements and the importance of adhering to the LSE validity criteria in routine clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the LSE validity rates of 2311 Fibroscans performed (1 August 2008 to 31 July 2011) in our tertiary liver outpatients department at the University Hospital Birmingham, UK. The diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan was assessed in 153 patients, by comparing LSE (valid and invalid) with the modified Ishak fibrosis stage on liver biopsy. RESULTS: Learning curve analysis highlighted that the greatest improvement in validity of LSE rates occurs in the operator’s first 10 Fibroscans, reaching 64.7% validity by the 50th Fibroscan. The correlation between LSE and the fibrosis stage on liver biopsy was superior in patients with a valid LSE (n=97) compared with those with an invalid LSE (n=56) (r(s) 0.577 vs 0.259; p=0.022). Area under receiving operating characteristics for significant fibrosis was greater when LSE was valid (0.83 vs 0.66; p=0.048). Using an LSE cut-off of 8 kPa, the negative predictive value of valid LSE was superior to invalid LSE for the detection of significant (84% vs 71%) and advanced fibrosis (100% vs 93%). CONCLUSIONS: Fibroscan requires minimal operator training (≥10 observed on patients), and when a valid LSE is obtained, it is an accurate tool for excluding advanced liver fibrosis. To ensure the diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan it is essential that the recommended LSE validity criteria are adhered to in routine clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3841754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38417542013-12-02 Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice Armstrong, M J Corbett, C Hodson, J Marwah, N Parker, R Houlihan, D D Rowe, I A Hazlehurst, J M Brown, R Hübscher, S G Mutimer, D Postgrad Med J Original Article BACKGROUND: Fibroscan is a quick, non-invasive technique used to measure liver stiffness (kPa), which correlates with fibrosis. To achieve a valid liver stiffness evaluation (LSE) the operator must obtain all the following three criteria: (1) ≥10 successful liver stiffness measurements; (2) IQR/median ratio <0.30 and (3) ≥60% measurement success rate. OBJECTIVES: To assess the operator training requirements and the importance of adhering to the LSE validity criteria in routine clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the LSE validity rates of 2311 Fibroscans performed (1 August 2008 to 31 July 2011) in our tertiary liver outpatients department at the University Hospital Birmingham, UK. The diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan was assessed in 153 patients, by comparing LSE (valid and invalid) with the modified Ishak fibrosis stage on liver biopsy. RESULTS: Learning curve analysis highlighted that the greatest improvement in validity of LSE rates occurs in the operator’s first 10 Fibroscans, reaching 64.7% validity by the 50th Fibroscan. The correlation between LSE and the fibrosis stage on liver biopsy was superior in patients with a valid LSE (n=97) compared with those with an invalid LSE (n=56) (r(s) 0.577 vs 0.259; p=0.022). Area under receiving operating characteristics for significant fibrosis was greater when LSE was valid (0.83 vs 0.66; p=0.048). Using an LSE cut-off of 8 kPa, the negative predictive value of valid LSE was superior to invalid LSE for the detection of significant (84% vs 71%) and advanced fibrosis (100% vs 93%). CONCLUSIONS: Fibroscan requires minimal operator training (≥10 observed on patients), and when a valid LSE is obtained, it is an accurate tool for excluding advanced liver fibrosis. To ensure the diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan it is essential that the recommended LSE validity criteria are adhered to in routine clinical practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-12 2013-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3841754/ /pubmed/23924687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131640 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Armstrong, M J
Corbett, C
Hodson, J
Marwah, N
Parker, R
Houlihan, D D
Rowe, I A
Hazlehurst, J M
Brown, R
Hübscher, S G
Mutimer, D
Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice
title Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice
title_full Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice
title_fullStr Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice
title_short Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice
title_sort operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of fibroscan in routine clinical practice
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23924687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131640
work_keys_str_mv AT armstrongmj operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice
AT corbettc operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice
AT hodsonj operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice
AT marwahn operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice
AT parkerr operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice
AT houlihandd operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice
AT roweia operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice
AT hazlehurstjm operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice
AT brownr operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice
AT hubschersg operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice
AT mutimerd operatortrainingrequirementsanddiagnosticaccuracyoffibroscaninroutineclinicalpractice