Cargando…

Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a top priority of healthcare organizations. The Joint Commission (TJC) is now requiring that healthcare organizations promulgate polices to investigate and resolve disruptive behavior among employees. METHODS: Our aims in this investigation utilizing the Provider Confli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stecker, Mona, Epstein, Nancy, Stecker, Mark M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340236
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.120781
_version_ 1782292868049666048
author Stecker, Mona
Epstein, Nancy
Stecker, Mark M.
author_facet Stecker, Mona
Epstein, Nancy
Stecker, Mark M.
author_sort Stecker, Mona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a top priority of healthcare organizations. The Joint Commission (TJC) is now requiring that healthcare organizations promulgate polices to investigate and resolve disruptive behavior among employees. METHODS: Our aims in this investigation utilizing the Provider Conflict Questionnaire (PCQ: Appendix A) included; determining what conflicts exist among a large sample of healthcare providers, how to assess the extent and frequency of disruptive behaviors, and what types of consequences result from these conflicts. The PCQ was distributed utilizing electronic postings, and predetermined e-mail lists to nurses and physicians across the US. RESULTS: The convenience sample included 617 respondents to the questionnaire. All incomplete responses (failure to answer all 17 items on the questionnaire) were excluded from data analysis. Our major finding was that disruptive behavior was the greatest problem observed in 82% of organizations; 74% personally witnessed these behaviors, while 5% personally experienced these behaviors. Friedman analysis of variance (ANOVA) analyses demonstrated that the difference between these three estimates were significant (χ(2) = 207.8 df = 2, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Healthcare organizations in the US are bound by TJC regulations to develop leadership standards that address disruptive behavior. These organizations can no longer stand by and ignore behaviors that threaten not only the bottom line of the institution, but also most critically, patient safety. As more attention is being paid to recommendations and mandates from the TJC and the Institute of Medicine (IOM), we will need more data, like those provided from this study, to better document how to address, resolve, and prevent future “misbehaviors”.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3841940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38419402013-12-11 Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers Stecker, Mona Epstein, Nancy Stecker, Mark M. Surg Neurol Int Surgical Neurology International: Spine BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a top priority of healthcare organizations. The Joint Commission (TJC) is now requiring that healthcare organizations promulgate polices to investigate and resolve disruptive behavior among employees. METHODS: Our aims in this investigation utilizing the Provider Conflict Questionnaire (PCQ: Appendix A) included; determining what conflicts exist among a large sample of healthcare providers, how to assess the extent and frequency of disruptive behaviors, and what types of consequences result from these conflicts. The PCQ was distributed utilizing electronic postings, and predetermined e-mail lists to nurses and physicians across the US. RESULTS: The convenience sample included 617 respondents to the questionnaire. All incomplete responses (failure to answer all 17 items on the questionnaire) were excluded from data analysis. Our major finding was that disruptive behavior was the greatest problem observed in 82% of organizations; 74% personally witnessed these behaviors, while 5% personally experienced these behaviors. Friedman analysis of variance (ANOVA) analyses demonstrated that the difference between these three estimates were significant (χ(2) = 207.8 df = 2, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Healthcare organizations in the US are bound by TJC regulations to develop leadership standards that address disruptive behavior. These organizations can no longer stand by and ignore behaviors that threaten not only the bottom line of the institution, but also most critically, patient safety. As more attention is being paid to recommendations and mandates from the TJC and the Institute of Medicine (IOM), we will need more data, like those provided from this study, to better document how to address, resolve, and prevent future “misbehaviors”. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3841940/ /pubmed/24340236 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.120781 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Stecker M. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Surgical Neurology International: Spine
Stecker, Mona
Epstein, Nancy
Stecker, Mark M.
Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers
title Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers
title_full Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers
title_fullStr Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers
title_short Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers
title_sort analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers
topic Surgical Neurology International: Spine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340236
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.120781
work_keys_str_mv AT steckermona analysisofinterproviderconflictsamonghealthcareproviders
AT epsteinnancy analysisofinterproviderconflictsamonghealthcareproviders
AT steckermarkm analysisofinterproviderconflictsamonghealthcareproviders