Cargando…
Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers
BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a top priority of healthcare organizations. The Joint Commission (TJC) is now requiring that healthcare organizations promulgate polices to investigate and resolve disruptive behavior among employees. METHODS: Our aims in this investigation utilizing the Provider Confli...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340236 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.120781 |
_version_ | 1782292868049666048 |
---|---|
author | Stecker, Mona Epstein, Nancy Stecker, Mark M. |
author_facet | Stecker, Mona Epstein, Nancy Stecker, Mark M. |
author_sort | Stecker, Mona |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a top priority of healthcare organizations. The Joint Commission (TJC) is now requiring that healthcare organizations promulgate polices to investigate and resolve disruptive behavior among employees. METHODS: Our aims in this investigation utilizing the Provider Conflict Questionnaire (PCQ: Appendix A) included; determining what conflicts exist among a large sample of healthcare providers, how to assess the extent and frequency of disruptive behaviors, and what types of consequences result from these conflicts. The PCQ was distributed utilizing electronic postings, and predetermined e-mail lists to nurses and physicians across the US. RESULTS: The convenience sample included 617 respondents to the questionnaire. All incomplete responses (failure to answer all 17 items on the questionnaire) were excluded from data analysis. Our major finding was that disruptive behavior was the greatest problem observed in 82% of organizations; 74% personally witnessed these behaviors, while 5% personally experienced these behaviors. Friedman analysis of variance (ANOVA) analyses demonstrated that the difference between these three estimates were significant (χ(2) = 207.8 df = 2, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Healthcare organizations in the US are bound by TJC regulations to develop leadership standards that address disruptive behavior. These organizations can no longer stand by and ignore behaviors that threaten not only the bottom line of the institution, but also most critically, patient safety. As more attention is being paid to recommendations and mandates from the TJC and the Institute of Medicine (IOM), we will need more data, like those provided from this study, to better document how to address, resolve, and prevent future “misbehaviors”. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3841940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38419402013-12-11 Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers Stecker, Mona Epstein, Nancy Stecker, Mark M. Surg Neurol Int Surgical Neurology International: Spine BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a top priority of healthcare organizations. The Joint Commission (TJC) is now requiring that healthcare organizations promulgate polices to investigate and resolve disruptive behavior among employees. METHODS: Our aims in this investigation utilizing the Provider Conflict Questionnaire (PCQ: Appendix A) included; determining what conflicts exist among a large sample of healthcare providers, how to assess the extent and frequency of disruptive behaviors, and what types of consequences result from these conflicts. The PCQ was distributed utilizing electronic postings, and predetermined e-mail lists to nurses and physicians across the US. RESULTS: The convenience sample included 617 respondents to the questionnaire. All incomplete responses (failure to answer all 17 items on the questionnaire) were excluded from data analysis. Our major finding was that disruptive behavior was the greatest problem observed in 82% of organizations; 74% personally witnessed these behaviors, while 5% personally experienced these behaviors. Friedman analysis of variance (ANOVA) analyses demonstrated that the difference between these three estimates were significant (χ(2) = 207.8 df = 2, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Healthcare organizations in the US are bound by TJC regulations to develop leadership standards that address disruptive behavior. These organizations can no longer stand by and ignore behaviors that threaten not only the bottom line of the institution, but also most critically, patient safety. As more attention is being paid to recommendations and mandates from the TJC and the Institute of Medicine (IOM), we will need more data, like those provided from this study, to better document how to address, resolve, and prevent future “misbehaviors”. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3841940/ /pubmed/24340236 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.120781 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Stecker M. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Surgical Neurology International: Spine Stecker, Mona Epstein, Nancy Stecker, Mark M. Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers |
title | Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers |
title_full | Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers |
title_fullStr | Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers |
title_short | Analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers |
title_sort | analysis of inter-provider conflicts among healthcare providers |
topic | Surgical Neurology International: Spine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3841940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340236 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.120781 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steckermona analysisofinterproviderconflictsamonghealthcareproviders AT epsteinnancy analysisofinterproviderconflictsamonghealthcareproviders AT steckermarkm analysisofinterproviderconflictsamonghealthcareproviders |