Cargando…

DNA Barcode Identification of Podocarpaceae—The Second Largest Conifer Family

We have generated matK, rbcL, and nrITS2 DNA barcodes for 320 specimens representing all 18 extant genera of the conifer family Podocarpaceae. The sample includes 145 of the 198 recognized species. Comparative analyses of sequence quality and species discrimination were conducted on the 159 individu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Little, Damon P., Knopf, Patrick, Schulz, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24312258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081008
_version_ 1782292920444911616
author Little, Damon P.
Knopf, Patrick
Schulz, Christian
author_facet Little, Damon P.
Knopf, Patrick
Schulz, Christian
author_sort Little, Damon P.
collection PubMed
description We have generated matK, rbcL, and nrITS2 DNA barcodes for 320 specimens representing all 18 extant genera of the conifer family Podocarpaceae. The sample includes 145 of the 198 recognized species. Comparative analyses of sequence quality and species discrimination were conducted on the 159 individuals from which all three markers were recovered (representing 15 genera and 97 species). The vast majority of sequences were of high quality (B (30) = 0.596–0.989). Even the lowest quality sequences exceeded the minimum requirements of the BARCODE data standard. In the few instances that low quality sequences were generated, the responsible mechanism could not be discerned. There were no statistically significant differences in the discriminatory power of markers or marker combinations (p = 0.05). The discriminatory power of the barcode markers individually and in combination is low (56.7% of species at maximum). In some instances, species discrimination failed in spite of ostensibly useful variation being present (genotypes were shared among species), but in many cases there was simply an absence of sequence variation. Barcode gaps (maximum intraspecific p–distance > minimum interspecific p–distance) were observed in 50.5% of species when all three markers were considered simultaneously. The presence of a barcode gap was not predictive of discrimination success (p = 0.02) and there was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of barcode gaps among markers (p = 0.05). In addition, there was no correlation between number of individuals sampled per species and the presence of a barcode gap (p = 0.27).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3842326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38423262013-12-05 DNA Barcode Identification of Podocarpaceae—The Second Largest Conifer Family Little, Damon P. Knopf, Patrick Schulz, Christian PLoS One Research Article We have generated matK, rbcL, and nrITS2 DNA barcodes for 320 specimens representing all 18 extant genera of the conifer family Podocarpaceae. The sample includes 145 of the 198 recognized species. Comparative analyses of sequence quality and species discrimination were conducted on the 159 individuals from which all three markers were recovered (representing 15 genera and 97 species). The vast majority of sequences were of high quality (B (30) = 0.596–0.989). Even the lowest quality sequences exceeded the minimum requirements of the BARCODE data standard. In the few instances that low quality sequences were generated, the responsible mechanism could not be discerned. There were no statistically significant differences in the discriminatory power of markers or marker combinations (p = 0.05). The discriminatory power of the barcode markers individually and in combination is low (56.7% of species at maximum). In some instances, species discrimination failed in spite of ostensibly useful variation being present (genotypes were shared among species), but in many cases there was simply an absence of sequence variation. Barcode gaps (maximum intraspecific p–distance > minimum interspecific p–distance) were observed in 50.5% of species when all three markers were considered simultaneously. The presence of a barcode gap was not predictive of discrimination success (p = 0.02) and there was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of barcode gaps among markers (p = 0.05). In addition, there was no correlation between number of individuals sampled per species and the presence of a barcode gap (p = 0.27). Public Library of Science 2013-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3842326/ /pubmed/24312258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081008 Text en © 2013 Little et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Little, Damon P.
Knopf, Patrick
Schulz, Christian
DNA Barcode Identification of Podocarpaceae—The Second Largest Conifer Family
title DNA Barcode Identification of Podocarpaceae—The Second Largest Conifer Family
title_full DNA Barcode Identification of Podocarpaceae—The Second Largest Conifer Family
title_fullStr DNA Barcode Identification of Podocarpaceae—The Second Largest Conifer Family
title_full_unstemmed DNA Barcode Identification of Podocarpaceae—The Second Largest Conifer Family
title_short DNA Barcode Identification of Podocarpaceae—The Second Largest Conifer Family
title_sort dna barcode identification of podocarpaceae—the second largest conifer family
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24312258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081008
work_keys_str_mv AT littledamonp dnabarcodeidentificationofpodocarpaceaethesecondlargestconiferfamily
AT knopfpatrick dnabarcodeidentificationofpodocarpaceaethesecondlargestconiferfamily
AT schulzchristian dnabarcodeidentificationofpodocarpaceaethesecondlargestconiferfamily