Cargando…

Documenting malaria case management coverage in Zambia: a systems effectiveness approach

BACKGROUND: National malaria control programmes and their partners must document progress associated with investments in malaria control. While documentation has been achieved through population-based surveys for most interventions, measuring changes in malaria case management has been challenging b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Littrell, Megan, Miller, John M, Ndhlovu, Micky, Hamainza, Busiku, Hawela, Moonga, Kamuliwo, Mulakwa, Hamer, Davidson H, Steketee, Richard W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24160186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-371
_version_ 1782292954556137472
author Littrell, Megan
Miller, John M
Ndhlovu, Micky
Hamainza, Busiku
Hawela, Moonga
Kamuliwo, Mulakwa
Hamer, Davidson H
Steketee, Richard W
author_facet Littrell, Megan
Miller, John M
Ndhlovu, Micky
Hamainza, Busiku
Hawela, Moonga
Kamuliwo, Mulakwa
Hamer, Davidson H
Steketee, Richard W
author_sort Littrell, Megan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: National malaria control programmes and their partners must document progress associated with investments in malaria control. While documentation has been achieved through population-based surveys for most interventions, measuring changes in malaria case management has been challenging because the increasing use of diagnostic tests reduces the denominator of febrile children who should receive anti-malarial treatment. Thus the widely used indicator, “proportion of children under five with fever in the last two weeks who received anti-malarial treatment according to national policy within 24 hours from onset of fever” is no longer relevant. METHODS: An alternative sequence of indicators using a systems effectiveness approach was examined using data from nationally representative surveys in Zambia: the 2012 population-based Malaria Indictor Survey (MIS) and the 2011 Health Facility Survey (HFS). The MIS measured fever treatment-seeking behaviour among 972 children under five years (CU5) and 1,848 people age five years and above. The HFS assessed management of 435 CU5 and 429 people age five and above with fever/history of fever seeking care at 149 health facilities. Consultation observation and exit interviews measured use of diagnostic tests, artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) prescription, and patient comprehension of prescribed regimens. RESULTS: Systems effectiveness for malaria case management among CU5 was estimated as follows: [100% ACT efficacy] x [55% fever treatment-seeking from an appropriate provider (MIS)] x [71% malaria blood testing (HFS)] x [86% ACT prescription for positive cases (HFS)] x [73% patient comprehension of prescribed ACT drug regimens (HFS)] = 25%. Systems effectiveness for malaria case management among people age five and above was estimated at 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Tracking progress in malaria case management coverage can no longer rely solely on population-based surveys; the way forward likely entails household surveys to track trends in fever treatment-seeking behaviour, and facility/provider data to track appropriate management of febrile patients. Applying health facility and population-based data to the systems effectiveness framework provides a cogent and feasible approach to documenting malaria case management coverage and identifying gaps to direct program action. In Zambia, this approach identified treatment-seeking behaviour as the largest contributor to reduction in systems effectiveness for malaria case management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3842626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38426262013-11-29 Documenting malaria case management coverage in Zambia: a systems effectiveness approach Littrell, Megan Miller, John M Ndhlovu, Micky Hamainza, Busiku Hawela, Moonga Kamuliwo, Mulakwa Hamer, Davidson H Steketee, Richard W Malar J Research BACKGROUND: National malaria control programmes and their partners must document progress associated with investments in malaria control. While documentation has been achieved through population-based surveys for most interventions, measuring changes in malaria case management has been challenging because the increasing use of diagnostic tests reduces the denominator of febrile children who should receive anti-malarial treatment. Thus the widely used indicator, “proportion of children under five with fever in the last two weeks who received anti-malarial treatment according to national policy within 24 hours from onset of fever” is no longer relevant. METHODS: An alternative sequence of indicators using a systems effectiveness approach was examined using data from nationally representative surveys in Zambia: the 2012 population-based Malaria Indictor Survey (MIS) and the 2011 Health Facility Survey (HFS). The MIS measured fever treatment-seeking behaviour among 972 children under five years (CU5) and 1,848 people age five years and above. The HFS assessed management of 435 CU5 and 429 people age five and above with fever/history of fever seeking care at 149 health facilities. Consultation observation and exit interviews measured use of diagnostic tests, artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) prescription, and patient comprehension of prescribed regimens. RESULTS: Systems effectiveness for malaria case management among CU5 was estimated as follows: [100% ACT efficacy] x [55% fever treatment-seeking from an appropriate provider (MIS)] x [71% malaria blood testing (HFS)] x [86% ACT prescription for positive cases (HFS)] x [73% patient comprehension of prescribed ACT drug regimens (HFS)] = 25%. Systems effectiveness for malaria case management among people age five and above was estimated at 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Tracking progress in malaria case management coverage can no longer rely solely on population-based surveys; the way forward likely entails household surveys to track trends in fever treatment-seeking behaviour, and facility/provider data to track appropriate management of febrile patients. Applying health facility and population-based data to the systems effectiveness framework provides a cogent and feasible approach to documenting malaria case management coverage and identifying gaps to direct program action. In Zambia, this approach identified treatment-seeking behaviour as the largest contributor to reduction in systems effectiveness for malaria case management. BioMed Central 2013-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3842626/ /pubmed/24160186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-371 Text en Copyright © 2013 Littrell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Littrell, Megan
Miller, John M
Ndhlovu, Micky
Hamainza, Busiku
Hawela, Moonga
Kamuliwo, Mulakwa
Hamer, Davidson H
Steketee, Richard W
Documenting malaria case management coverage in Zambia: a systems effectiveness approach
title Documenting malaria case management coverage in Zambia: a systems effectiveness approach
title_full Documenting malaria case management coverage in Zambia: a systems effectiveness approach
title_fullStr Documenting malaria case management coverage in Zambia: a systems effectiveness approach
title_full_unstemmed Documenting malaria case management coverage in Zambia: a systems effectiveness approach
title_short Documenting malaria case management coverage in Zambia: a systems effectiveness approach
title_sort documenting malaria case management coverage in zambia: a systems effectiveness approach
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24160186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-371
work_keys_str_mv AT littrellmegan documentingmalariacasemanagementcoverageinzambiaasystemseffectivenessapproach
AT millerjohnm documentingmalariacasemanagementcoverageinzambiaasystemseffectivenessapproach
AT ndhlovumicky documentingmalariacasemanagementcoverageinzambiaasystemseffectivenessapproach
AT hamainzabusiku documentingmalariacasemanagementcoverageinzambiaasystemseffectivenessapproach
AT hawelamoonga documentingmalariacasemanagementcoverageinzambiaasystemseffectivenessapproach
AT kamuliwomulakwa documentingmalariacasemanagementcoverageinzambiaasystemseffectivenessapproach
AT hamerdavidsonh documentingmalariacasemanagementcoverageinzambiaasystemseffectivenessapproach
AT steketeerichardw documentingmalariacasemanagementcoverageinzambiaasystemseffectivenessapproach