Cargando…
The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice
To inform clinical guidelines and patient care we need high quality evidence on the relative benefits and harms of intervention. Patient reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials can “empower patients to make decisions based on their values” and “level the playing field between physician and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24168680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-184 |
_version_ | 1782292958645583872 |
---|---|
author | Calvert, Melanie Brundage, Michael Jacobsen, Paul B Schünemann, Holger J Efficace, Fabio |
author_facet | Calvert, Melanie Brundage, Michael Jacobsen, Paul B Schünemann, Holger J Efficace, Fabio |
author_sort | Calvert, Melanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | To inform clinical guidelines and patient care we need high quality evidence on the relative benefits and harms of intervention. Patient reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials can “empower patients to make decisions based on their values” and “level the playing field between physician and patient”. While clinicians have a good understanding of the concept of health-related quality of life and other PROs, evidence suggests that many do not feel comfortable in using the data from trials to inform discussions with patients and clinical practice. This may in part reflect concerns over the integrity of the data and difficulties in interpreting the results arising from poor reporting. The new CONSORT PRO extension aims to improve the reporting of PROs in trials to facilitate the use of results to inform clinical practice and health policy. While the CONSORT PRO extension is an important first step in the process, we need broader engagement with the guidance to facilitate optimal reporting and maximize use of PRO data in a clinical setting. Endorsement by journal editors, authors and peer reviewers are crucial steps. Improved design, implementation and transparent reporting of PROs in clinical trials are necessary to provide high quality evidence to inform evidence synthesis and clinical practice guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3842645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38426452013-11-29 The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice Calvert, Melanie Brundage, Michael Jacobsen, Paul B Schünemann, Holger J Efficace, Fabio Health Qual Life Outcomes Review To inform clinical guidelines and patient care we need high quality evidence on the relative benefits and harms of intervention. Patient reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials can “empower patients to make decisions based on their values” and “level the playing field between physician and patient”. While clinicians have a good understanding of the concept of health-related quality of life and other PROs, evidence suggests that many do not feel comfortable in using the data from trials to inform discussions with patients and clinical practice. This may in part reflect concerns over the integrity of the data and difficulties in interpreting the results arising from poor reporting. The new CONSORT PRO extension aims to improve the reporting of PROs in trials to facilitate the use of results to inform clinical practice and health policy. While the CONSORT PRO extension is an important first step in the process, we need broader engagement with the guidance to facilitate optimal reporting and maximize use of PRO data in a clinical setting. Endorsement by journal editors, authors and peer reviewers are crucial steps. Improved design, implementation and transparent reporting of PROs in clinical trials are necessary to provide high quality evidence to inform evidence synthesis and clinical practice guidelines. BioMed Central 2013-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3842645/ /pubmed/24168680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-184 Text en Copyright © 2013 Calvert et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Calvert, Melanie Brundage, Michael Jacobsen, Paul B Schünemann, Holger J Efficace, Fabio The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice |
title | The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice |
title_full | The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice |
title_fullStr | The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice |
title_full_unstemmed | The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice |
title_short | The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice |
title_sort | consort patient-reported outcome (pro) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24168680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT calvertmelanie theconsortpatientreportedoutcomeproextensionimplicationsforclinicaltrialsandpractice AT brundagemichael theconsortpatientreportedoutcomeproextensionimplicationsforclinicaltrialsandpractice AT jacobsenpaulb theconsortpatientreportedoutcomeproextensionimplicationsforclinicaltrialsandpractice AT schunemannholgerj theconsortpatientreportedoutcomeproextensionimplicationsforclinicaltrialsandpractice AT efficacefabio theconsortpatientreportedoutcomeproextensionimplicationsforclinicaltrialsandpractice AT calvertmelanie consortpatientreportedoutcomeproextensionimplicationsforclinicaltrialsandpractice AT brundagemichael consortpatientreportedoutcomeproextensionimplicationsforclinicaltrialsandpractice AT jacobsenpaulb consortpatientreportedoutcomeproextensionimplicationsforclinicaltrialsandpractice AT schunemannholgerj consortpatientreportedoutcomeproextensionimplicationsforclinicaltrialsandpractice AT efficacefabio consortpatientreportedoutcomeproextensionimplicationsforclinicaltrialsandpractice |