Cargando…

Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)

BACKGROUND: There is a need for better interpretation of orthopedic treatment effects. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are already commonly used for patient evaluation. PROMs can be used to determine treatment effects in research as well as in clinical settings by calculating change scores...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Kampen, Derk A, Willems, W Jaap, van Beers, Loes W A H, Castelein, Rene M, Scholtes, Vanessa A B, Terwee, Caroline B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24225254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-8-40
_version_ 1782292963233103872
author van Kampen, Derk A
Willems, W Jaap
van Beers, Loes W A H
Castelein, Rene M
Scholtes, Vanessa A B
Terwee, Caroline B
author_facet van Kampen, Derk A
Willems, W Jaap
van Beers, Loes W A H
Castelein, Rene M
Scholtes, Vanessa A B
Terwee, Caroline B
author_sort van Kampen, Derk A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need for better interpretation of orthopedic treatment effects. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are already commonly used for patient evaluation. PROMs can be used to determine treatment effects in research as well as in clinical settings by calculating change scores, with pre- and post-treatment evaluation. The smallest detectable change (SDC) and minimal important change (MIC) are two important benchmarks for interpreting these change scores. The purpose was to determine the SDC and the MIC for four commonly used shoulder-related PROMs: Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH and QuickDASH), and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). METHODS: A cohort of 164 consecutive patients with shoulder problems visiting an orthopedic outpatient clinic completed the SST, DASH, and the OSS at their first visit and 6 months after operative or non-operative treatment. The SDC was calculated with a test re-test protocol (0–2 weeks). For the MIC, change scores (0–6 months of evaluation) were calculated in seven subgroups of patients, according to an additional self-administered ranking of change over time (anchor-based mean change technique). The MIC is defined as the average score of the ‘slightly improved’ group according to the anchor. The QuickDASH was computed from the DASH. RESULTS: The SDC of the SST was 2.8, DASH 16.3, QuickDASH 17.1, and OSS 6.0. The MIC change score for the SST was 2.2, DASH 12.4, QuickDASH 13.4, and OSS 6.0. CONCLUSION: This study shows that on an individual patient-based level, when taking into account SDC and MIC, the change score should exceed 2.8 points for the SST, 16.3 points for the DASH, 17.1 points for the QuickDASH, and 6.0 points for the OSS to have a clinically relevant change on a PROM, which is not due to measurement error.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3842665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38426652013-11-29 Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) van Kampen, Derk A Willems, W Jaap van Beers, Loes W A H Castelein, Rene M Scholtes, Vanessa A B Terwee, Caroline B J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a need for better interpretation of orthopedic treatment effects. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are already commonly used for patient evaluation. PROMs can be used to determine treatment effects in research as well as in clinical settings by calculating change scores, with pre- and post-treatment evaluation. The smallest detectable change (SDC) and minimal important change (MIC) are two important benchmarks for interpreting these change scores. The purpose was to determine the SDC and the MIC for four commonly used shoulder-related PROMs: Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH and QuickDASH), and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). METHODS: A cohort of 164 consecutive patients with shoulder problems visiting an orthopedic outpatient clinic completed the SST, DASH, and the OSS at their first visit and 6 months after operative or non-operative treatment. The SDC was calculated with a test re-test protocol (0–2 weeks). For the MIC, change scores (0–6 months of evaluation) were calculated in seven subgroups of patients, according to an additional self-administered ranking of change over time (anchor-based mean change technique). The MIC is defined as the average score of the ‘slightly improved’ group according to the anchor. The QuickDASH was computed from the DASH. RESULTS: The SDC of the SST was 2.8, DASH 16.3, QuickDASH 17.1, and OSS 6.0. The MIC change score for the SST was 2.2, DASH 12.4, QuickDASH 13.4, and OSS 6.0. CONCLUSION: This study shows that on an individual patient-based level, when taking into account SDC and MIC, the change score should exceed 2.8 points for the SST, 16.3 points for the DASH, 17.1 points for the QuickDASH, and 6.0 points for the OSS to have a clinically relevant change on a PROM, which is not due to measurement error. BioMed Central 2013-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3842665/ /pubmed/24225254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-8-40 Text en Copyright © 2013 van Kampen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Kampen, Derk A
Willems, W Jaap
van Beers, Loes W A H
Castelein, Rene M
Scholtes, Vanessa A B
Terwee, Caroline B
Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
title Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
title_full Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
title_fullStr Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
title_full_unstemmed Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
title_short Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
title_sort determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (sdc) and the minimal important change (mic) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (proms)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24225254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-8-40
work_keys_str_mv AT vankampenderka determinationandcomparisonofthesmallestdetectablechangesdcandtheminimalimportantchangemicoffourshoulderpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresproms
AT willemswjaap determinationandcomparisonofthesmallestdetectablechangesdcandtheminimalimportantchangemicoffourshoulderpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresproms
AT vanbeersloeswah determinationandcomparisonofthesmallestdetectablechangesdcandtheminimalimportantchangemicoffourshoulderpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresproms
AT casteleinrenem determinationandcomparisonofthesmallestdetectablechangesdcandtheminimalimportantchangemicoffourshoulderpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresproms
AT scholtesvanessaab determinationandcomparisonofthesmallestdetectablechangesdcandtheminimalimportantchangemicoffourshoulderpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresproms
AT terweecarolineb determinationandcomparisonofthesmallestdetectablechangesdcandtheminimalimportantchangemicoffourshoulderpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresproms