Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of three different irrigation devices in removal of debris from root canal at two different levels: An in vitro study

AIM: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the cleaning efficacy of NaviTip, Max-i-Probe and Endovac in removal of debris from the root canal at 1.5 and 3.5 mm from the apex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty single-rooted teeth were divided into four groups according to the root canal irrig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saini, Meenu, Kumari, Manju, Taneja, Sonali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24347883
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.120959
_version_ 1782292974638465024
author Saini, Meenu
Kumari, Manju
Taneja, Sonali
author_facet Saini, Meenu
Kumari, Manju
Taneja, Sonali
author_sort Saini, Meenu
collection PubMed
description AIM: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the cleaning efficacy of NaviTip, Max-i-Probe and Endovac in removal of debris from the root canal at 1.5 and 3.5 mm from the apex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty single-rooted teeth were divided into four groups according to the root canal irrigation system (EndoVac, NaviTip, Max-i-Probe, and control). Instrumentation was done using ProFile 0.06 taper series to MAF #40. Root canals were irrigated after each file size with 1 ml of 5% NaOCl. For final irrigation 5 ml of 5% NaOCl and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was used. Each group was irrigated with a different irrigation device. Four micron thick serial sections were prepared at 1.5 and 3.5 mm from the apical level and photographs were taken for the analysis. The influence of the irrigation system was evaluated using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and unpaired t-test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Endovac showed significantly least amount of mean percentage debris followed by Max-i-probe and NaviTip at both levels (P < 0.05). In all the experimental groups, significantly less amount of mean percentage debris was seen at 3.5 mm level than at 1.5 mm level (P < 0.05). However, the difference was statistically insignificant in case of Endovac irrigation system group. CONCLUSIONS: Amongst all the experimental groups, Endovac removed significantly more debris followed by Max-i-probe and NaviTip at both levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3842717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38427172013-12-13 Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of three different irrigation devices in removal of debris from root canal at two different levels: An in vitro study Saini, Meenu Kumari, Manju Taneja, Sonali J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the cleaning efficacy of NaviTip, Max-i-Probe and Endovac in removal of debris from the root canal at 1.5 and 3.5 mm from the apex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty single-rooted teeth were divided into four groups according to the root canal irrigation system (EndoVac, NaviTip, Max-i-Probe, and control). Instrumentation was done using ProFile 0.06 taper series to MAF #40. Root canals were irrigated after each file size with 1 ml of 5% NaOCl. For final irrigation 5 ml of 5% NaOCl and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was used. Each group was irrigated with a different irrigation device. Four micron thick serial sections were prepared at 1.5 and 3.5 mm from the apical level and photographs were taken for the analysis. The influence of the irrigation system was evaluated using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and unpaired t-test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Endovac showed significantly least amount of mean percentage debris followed by Max-i-probe and NaviTip at both levels (P < 0.05). In all the experimental groups, significantly less amount of mean percentage debris was seen at 3.5 mm level than at 1.5 mm level (P < 0.05). However, the difference was statistically insignificant in case of Endovac irrigation system group. CONCLUSIONS: Amongst all the experimental groups, Endovac removed significantly more debris followed by Max-i-probe and NaviTip at both levels. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3842717/ /pubmed/24347883 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.120959 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Saini, Meenu
Kumari, Manju
Taneja, Sonali
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of three different irrigation devices in removal of debris from root canal at two different levels: An in vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of three different irrigation devices in removal of debris from root canal at two different levels: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of three different irrigation devices in removal of debris from root canal at two different levels: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of three different irrigation devices in removal of debris from root canal at two different levels: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of three different irrigation devices in removal of debris from root canal at two different levels: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of three different irrigation devices in removal of debris from root canal at two different levels: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of the efficacy of three different irrigation devices in removal of debris from root canal at two different levels: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24347883
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.120959
work_keys_str_mv AT sainimeenu comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofthreedifferentirrigationdevicesinremovalofdebrisfromrootcanalattwodifferentlevelsaninvitrostudy
AT kumarimanju comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofthreedifferentirrigationdevicesinremovalofdebrisfromrootcanalattwodifferentlevelsaninvitrostudy
AT tanejasonali comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofthreedifferentirrigationdevicesinremovalofdebrisfromrootcanalattwodifferentlevelsaninvitrostudy