Cargando…

An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study

AIM: To compare the effect of 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinallis with chlorhexidine as an anticaries mouthwash – an in vivo study. METHODOLOGY: 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinalis were prepared. Forty five high caries risk patients were d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velmurugan, Arumugam, Madhubala, Manavalan Madhana, Bhavani, Sreekrishnapillai, Satheesh Kumar, Kasinathan Subbaian, Sathyanarayana, Srinivasan Sai, Gurucharan, Natanasikamani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24347891
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.120958
_version_ 1782292976453550080
author Velmurugan, Arumugam
Madhubala, Manavalan Madhana
Bhavani, Sreekrishnapillai
Satheesh Kumar, Kasinathan Subbaian
Sathyanarayana, Srinivasan Sai
Gurucharan, Natanasikamani
author_facet Velmurugan, Arumugam
Madhubala, Manavalan Madhana
Bhavani, Sreekrishnapillai
Satheesh Kumar, Kasinathan Subbaian
Sathyanarayana, Srinivasan Sai
Gurucharan, Natanasikamani
author_sort Velmurugan, Arumugam
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the effect of 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinallis with chlorhexidine as an anticaries mouthwash – an in vivo study. METHODOLOGY: 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinalis were prepared. Forty five high caries risk patients were divided into group 1,2,3 [ n=15]and asked to rinse with 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinalis, 0.2% Chlorhexidine for 40 seconds respectively. Salivary samples were collected for pH, buffering capacity before and after rinsing at repeated intervals of 10, 30,60 and 90 minutes and except for microbial analysis for which it was collected before and 90 minutes after rinsing. The pH and the buffering capacity analysis was done using chairside kit and percentage of reduction of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus were tabulated and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: For salivary pH, Group 2 showed the highest peak value followed by group 1. For salivary buffering capacity, there was no significant difference between any of the groups. For microbial count, highest percentage of reduction was seen in group 2 followed by group 1 and 3. However group 3 was more efficient at 90 minutes followed by group 1 and group 2. CONCLUSION: The aqueous extract of Embilica officinalis extract and Terminalia chebula was more effective anticaries mouthwash but with less time of action than chlorhexidine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3842725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38427252013-12-13 An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study Velmurugan, Arumugam Madhubala, Manavalan Madhana Bhavani, Sreekrishnapillai Satheesh Kumar, Kasinathan Subbaian Sathyanarayana, Srinivasan Sai Gurucharan, Natanasikamani J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: To compare the effect of 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinallis with chlorhexidine as an anticaries mouthwash – an in vivo study. METHODOLOGY: 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinalis were prepared. Forty five high caries risk patients were divided into group 1,2,3 [ n=15]and asked to rinse with 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinalis, 0.2% Chlorhexidine for 40 seconds respectively. Salivary samples were collected for pH, buffering capacity before and after rinsing at repeated intervals of 10, 30,60 and 90 minutes and except for microbial analysis for which it was collected before and 90 minutes after rinsing. The pH and the buffering capacity analysis was done using chairside kit and percentage of reduction of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus were tabulated and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: For salivary pH, Group 2 showed the highest peak value followed by group 1. For salivary buffering capacity, there was no significant difference between any of the groups. For microbial count, highest percentage of reduction was seen in group 2 followed by group 1 and 3. However group 3 was more efficient at 90 minutes followed by group 1 and group 2. CONCLUSION: The aqueous extract of Embilica officinalis extract and Terminalia chebula was more effective anticaries mouthwash but with less time of action than chlorhexidine. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3842725/ /pubmed/24347891 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.120958 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Velmurugan, Arumugam
Madhubala, Manavalan Madhana
Bhavani, Sreekrishnapillai
Satheesh Kumar, Kasinathan Subbaian
Sathyanarayana, Srinivasan Sai
Gurucharan, Natanasikamani
An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study
title An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study
title_full An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study
title_fullStr An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study
title_full_unstemmed An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study
title_short An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study
title_sort in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts emblica officinalis and terminalia chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: a preliminary study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24347891
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.120958
work_keys_str_mv AT velmuruganarumugam aninvivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy
AT madhubalamanavalanmadhana aninvivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy
AT bhavanisreekrishnapillai aninvivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy
AT satheeshkumarkasinathansubbaian aninvivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy
AT sathyanarayanasrinivasansai aninvivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy
AT gurucharannatanasikamani aninvivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy
AT velmuruganarumugam invivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy
AT madhubalamanavalanmadhana invivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy
AT bhavanisreekrishnapillai invivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy
AT satheeshkumarkasinathansubbaian invivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy
AT sathyanarayanasrinivasansai invivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy
AT gurucharannatanasikamani invivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy