Cargando…
An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study
AIM: To compare the effect of 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinallis with chlorhexidine as an anticaries mouthwash – an in vivo study. METHODOLOGY: 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinalis were prepared. Forty five high caries risk patients were d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24347891 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.120958 |
_version_ | 1782292976453550080 |
---|---|
author | Velmurugan, Arumugam Madhubala, Manavalan Madhana Bhavani, Sreekrishnapillai Satheesh Kumar, Kasinathan Subbaian Sathyanarayana, Srinivasan Sai Gurucharan, Natanasikamani |
author_facet | Velmurugan, Arumugam Madhubala, Manavalan Madhana Bhavani, Sreekrishnapillai Satheesh Kumar, Kasinathan Subbaian Sathyanarayana, Srinivasan Sai Gurucharan, Natanasikamani |
author_sort | Velmurugan, Arumugam |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To compare the effect of 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinallis with chlorhexidine as an anticaries mouthwash – an in vivo study. METHODOLOGY: 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinalis were prepared. Forty five high caries risk patients were divided into group 1,2,3 [ n=15]and asked to rinse with 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinalis, 0.2% Chlorhexidine for 40 seconds respectively. Salivary samples were collected for pH, buffering capacity before and after rinsing at repeated intervals of 10, 30,60 and 90 minutes and except for microbial analysis for which it was collected before and 90 minutes after rinsing. The pH and the buffering capacity analysis was done using chairside kit and percentage of reduction of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus were tabulated and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: For salivary pH, Group 2 showed the highest peak value followed by group 1. For salivary buffering capacity, there was no significant difference between any of the groups. For microbial count, highest percentage of reduction was seen in group 2 followed by group 1 and 3. However group 3 was more efficient at 90 minutes followed by group 1 and group 2. CONCLUSION: The aqueous extract of Embilica officinalis extract and Terminalia chebula was more effective anticaries mouthwash but with less time of action than chlorhexidine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3842725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38427252013-12-13 An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study Velmurugan, Arumugam Madhubala, Manavalan Madhana Bhavani, Sreekrishnapillai Satheesh Kumar, Kasinathan Subbaian Sathyanarayana, Srinivasan Sai Gurucharan, Natanasikamani J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: To compare the effect of 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinallis with chlorhexidine as an anticaries mouthwash – an in vivo study. METHODOLOGY: 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinalis were prepared. Forty five high caries risk patients were divided into group 1,2,3 [ n=15]and asked to rinse with 20% aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula and Emblica officinalis, 0.2% Chlorhexidine for 40 seconds respectively. Salivary samples were collected for pH, buffering capacity before and after rinsing at repeated intervals of 10, 30,60 and 90 minutes and except for microbial analysis for which it was collected before and 90 minutes after rinsing. The pH and the buffering capacity analysis was done using chairside kit and percentage of reduction of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus were tabulated and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: For salivary pH, Group 2 showed the highest peak value followed by group 1. For salivary buffering capacity, there was no significant difference between any of the groups. For microbial count, highest percentage of reduction was seen in group 2 followed by group 1 and 3. However group 3 was more efficient at 90 minutes followed by group 1 and group 2. CONCLUSION: The aqueous extract of Embilica officinalis extract and Terminalia chebula was more effective anticaries mouthwash but with less time of action than chlorhexidine. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3842725/ /pubmed/24347891 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.120958 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Velmurugan, Arumugam Madhubala, Manavalan Madhana Bhavani, Sreekrishnapillai Satheesh Kumar, Kasinathan Subbaian Sathyanarayana, Srinivasan Sai Gurucharan, Natanasikamani An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study |
title | An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study |
title_full | An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study |
title_fullStr | An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study |
title_full_unstemmed | An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study |
title_short | An in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts Emblica officinalis and Terminalia Chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: A preliminary study |
title_sort | in-vivo comparative evaluation of two herbal extracts emblica officinalis and terminalia chebula with chlorhexidine as an anticaries agent: a preliminary study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24347891 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.120958 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT velmuruganarumugam aninvivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy AT madhubalamanavalanmadhana aninvivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy AT bhavanisreekrishnapillai aninvivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy AT satheeshkumarkasinathansubbaian aninvivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy AT sathyanarayanasrinivasansai aninvivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy AT gurucharannatanasikamani aninvivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy AT velmuruganarumugam invivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy AT madhubalamanavalanmadhana invivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy AT bhavanisreekrishnapillai invivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy AT satheeshkumarkasinathansubbaian invivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy AT sathyanarayanasrinivasansai invivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy AT gurucharannatanasikamani invivocomparativeevaluationoftwoherbalextractsemblicaofficinalisandterminaliachebulawithchlorhexidineasananticariesagentapreliminarystudy |