Cargando…
Does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others?
In this study we aimed to investigate how awareness of bodily responses, referred to as interoceptive awareness, influences decision-making in a social interactive context. Interoceptive awareness is thought to be crucial for adequate regulation of one’s emotions. However, there is a dearth of studi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3843146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24348438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00880 |
_version_ | 1782293037235306496 |
---|---|
author | van 't Wout, Mascha Faught, Sara Menino, David |
author_facet | van 't Wout, Mascha Faught, Sara Menino, David |
author_sort | van 't Wout, Mascha |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study we aimed to investigate how awareness of bodily responses, referred to as interoceptive awareness, influences decision-making in a social interactive context. Interoceptive awareness is thought to be crucial for adequate regulation of one’s emotions. However, there is a dearth of studies that examine the association between interoceptive awareness and the ability to regulate emotions during interpersonal decision-making. Here, we quantified interoceptive awareness with a heartbeat detection task in which we measured the difference between subjective self-reports and an objective psychophysiological measurement of participant heart rates. Social decision-making was quantified using a two-round Ultimatum Game. Participants were asked to first reject or accept an unfair division of money proposed by a partner. In turn, participants could then make an offer on how to divide an amount of money with the same partner. Participants performed 20 rounds of the two-round Ultimatum Game twice, once during baseline condition and once while asked to reappraise emotional reactions when confronted with unfair offers from partners. Results showed that after reappraisal participants (1) accepted more unfair offers and (2) offered higher return divisions, as compared to baseline. With respect to interoceptive awareness, participants with better heartbeat detection scores tended to report less emotional involvement when they applied reappraisal while playing the Ultimatum Game. However, there was no reliably significant relationship between heartbeat detection and the acceptance of unfair offers. Similarly, heartbeat detection accuracy was not related to return offers made in the second round of the Ultimatum Game or the habitual use of emotion regulation. These preliminary findings suggest that the relationship between interoceptive awareness and behavioral changes due to emotion regulation in a social decision-making context appears to be complex. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3843146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38431462013-12-13 Does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others? van 't Wout, Mascha Faught, Sara Menino, David Front Psychol Psychology In this study we aimed to investigate how awareness of bodily responses, referred to as interoceptive awareness, influences decision-making in a social interactive context. Interoceptive awareness is thought to be crucial for adequate regulation of one’s emotions. However, there is a dearth of studies that examine the association between interoceptive awareness and the ability to regulate emotions during interpersonal decision-making. Here, we quantified interoceptive awareness with a heartbeat detection task in which we measured the difference between subjective self-reports and an objective psychophysiological measurement of participant heart rates. Social decision-making was quantified using a two-round Ultimatum Game. Participants were asked to first reject or accept an unfair division of money proposed by a partner. In turn, participants could then make an offer on how to divide an amount of money with the same partner. Participants performed 20 rounds of the two-round Ultimatum Game twice, once during baseline condition and once while asked to reappraise emotional reactions when confronted with unfair offers from partners. Results showed that after reappraisal participants (1) accepted more unfair offers and (2) offered higher return divisions, as compared to baseline. With respect to interoceptive awareness, participants with better heartbeat detection scores tended to report less emotional involvement when they applied reappraisal while playing the Ultimatum Game. However, there was no reliably significant relationship between heartbeat detection and the acceptance of unfair offers. Similarly, heartbeat detection accuracy was not related to return offers made in the second round of the Ultimatum Game or the habitual use of emotion regulation. These preliminary findings suggest that the relationship between interoceptive awareness and behavioral changes due to emotion regulation in a social decision-making context appears to be complex. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3843146/ /pubmed/24348438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00880 Text en Copyright © 2013 van ’t Wout, Faught and Menino. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology van 't Wout, Mascha Faught, Sara Menino, David Does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others? |
title | Does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others? |
title_full | Does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others? |
title_fullStr | Does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others? |
title_short | Does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others? |
title_sort | does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3843146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24348438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00880 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vantwoutmascha doesinteroceptiveawarenessaffecttheabilitytoregulateunfairtreatmentbyothers AT faughtsara doesinteroceptiveawarenessaffecttheabilitytoregulateunfairtreatmentbyothers AT meninodavid doesinteroceptiveawarenessaffecttheabilitytoregulateunfairtreatmentbyothers |