Cargando…
Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles
The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the global reference curves adapted on the basis of WHO data for India and the Hadlock reference curves fit the population in India and to validate the reference curves. The data were retrieved retrospectively from the records of women registration...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3843338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24347860 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.120270 |
_version_ | 1782293050330972160 |
---|---|
author | Badade, Anirudh B Bhide, Amar Satoskar, Purnima Wadekar, Darshan |
author_facet | Badade, Anirudh B Bhide, Amar Satoskar, Purnima Wadekar, Darshan |
author_sort | Badade, Anirudh B |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the global reference curves adapted on the basis of WHO data for India and the Hadlock reference curves fit the population in India and to validate the reference curves. The data were retrieved retrospectively from the records of women registration for antenatal care at a charitable maternity hospital in Mumbai, India. All pregnancies were dated on CRL obtained before 14 weeks. Births before 34(th) week were excluded. The expected frequencies of birth weights below the 1(st), 5(th), 10(th), 50(th), 90(th), 95(th) and 99(th) centiles from three reference ranges were compared with observed frequencies. It was found that the WHO generic reference adapted to India significantly underpredicted the birth weights and that the Hadlock reference ranges significantly overpredicted the birth weights. The use of generic reference adapted to Sri Lanka showed a better fit to the observed data. We concluded that global reference curves adapted on the basis of WHO data for India and the Hadlock reference ranges do not fit all the population in India and the charts need validation. Reference charts modified on the basis of data for Sri Lankan population show a better fit to the observed data, and therefore are more appropriate for use in clinical practice in South India. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3843338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38433382013-12-13 Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles Badade, Anirudh B Bhide, Amar Satoskar, Purnima Wadekar, Darshan Indian J Radiol Imaging Genitourinary and Obstetric Radiology The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the global reference curves adapted on the basis of WHO data for India and the Hadlock reference curves fit the population in India and to validate the reference curves. The data were retrieved retrospectively from the records of women registration for antenatal care at a charitable maternity hospital in Mumbai, India. All pregnancies were dated on CRL obtained before 14 weeks. Births before 34(th) week were excluded. The expected frequencies of birth weights below the 1(st), 5(th), 10(th), 50(th), 90(th), 95(th) and 99(th) centiles from three reference ranges were compared with observed frequencies. It was found that the WHO generic reference adapted to India significantly underpredicted the birth weights and that the Hadlock reference ranges significantly overpredicted the birth weights. The use of generic reference adapted to Sri Lanka showed a better fit to the observed data. We concluded that global reference curves adapted on the basis of WHO data for India and the Hadlock reference ranges do not fit all the population in India and the charts need validation. Reference charts modified on the basis of data for Sri Lankan population show a better fit to the observed data, and therefore are more appropriate for use in clinical practice in South India. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3843338/ /pubmed/24347860 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.120270 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Genitourinary and Obstetric Radiology Badade, Anirudh B Bhide, Amar Satoskar, Purnima Wadekar, Darshan Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles |
title | Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles |
title_full | Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles |
title_fullStr | Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles |
title_short | Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles |
title_sort | validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles |
topic | Genitourinary and Obstetric Radiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3843338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24347860 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.120270 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT badadeanirudhb validationoftheglobalreferenceforfetalweightandbirthweightpercentiles AT bhideamar validationoftheglobalreferenceforfetalweightandbirthweightpercentiles AT satoskarpurnima validationoftheglobalreferenceforfetalweightandbirthweightpercentiles AT wadekardarshan validationoftheglobalreferenceforfetalweightandbirthweightpercentiles |