Cargando…

Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the global reference curves adapted on the basis of WHO data for India and the Hadlock reference curves fit the population in India and to validate the reference curves. The data were retrieved retrospectively from the records of women registration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Badade, Anirudh B, Bhide, Amar, Satoskar, Purnima, Wadekar, Darshan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3843338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24347860
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.120270
_version_ 1782293050330972160
author Badade, Anirudh B
Bhide, Amar
Satoskar, Purnima
Wadekar, Darshan
author_facet Badade, Anirudh B
Bhide, Amar
Satoskar, Purnima
Wadekar, Darshan
author_sort Badade, Anirudh B
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the global reference curves adapted on the basis of WHO data for India and the Hadlock reference curves fit the population in India and to validate the reference curves. The data were retrieved retrospectively from the records of women registration for antenatal care at a charitable maternity hospital in Mumbai, India. All pregnancies were dated on CRL obtained before 14 weeks. Births before 34(th) week were excluded. The expected frequencies of birth weights below the 1(st), 5(th), 10(th), 50(th), 90(th), 95(th) and 99(th) centiles from three reference ranges were compared with observed frequencies. It was found that the WHO generic reference adapted to India significantly underpredicted the birth weights and that the Hadlock reference ranges significantly overpredicted the birth weights. The use of generic reference adapted to Sri Lanka showed a better fit to the observed data. We concluded that global reference curves adapted on the basis of WHO data for India and the Hadlock reference ranges do not fit all the population in India and the charts need validation. Reference charts modified on the basis of data for Sri Lankan population show a better fit to the observed data, and therefore are more appropriate for use in clinical practice in South India.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3843338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38433382013-12-13 Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles Badade, Anirudh B Bhide, Amar Satoskar, Purnima Wadekar, Darshan Indian J Radiol Imaging Genitourinary and Obstetric Radiology The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the global reference curves adapted on the basis of WHO data for India and the Hadlock reference curves fit the population in India and to validate the reference curves. The data were retrieved retrospectively from the records of women registration for antenatal care at a charitable maternity hospital in Mumbai, India. All pregnancies were dated on CRL obtained before 14 weeks. Births before 34(th) week were excluded. The expected frequencies of birth weights below the 1(st), 5(th), 10(th), 50(th), 90(th), 95(th) and 99(th) centiles from three reference ranges were compared with observed frequencies. It was found that the WHO generic reference adapted to India significantly underpredicted the birth weights and that the Hadlock reference ranges significantly overpredicted the birth weights. The use of generic reference adapted to Sri Lanka showed a better fit to the observed data. We concluded that global reference curves adapted on the basis of WHO data for India and the Hadlock reference ranges do not fit all the population in India and the charts need validation. Reference charts modified on the basis of data for Sri Lankan population show a better fit to the observed data, and therefore are more appropriate for use in clinical practice in South India. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3843338/ /pubmed/24347860 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.120270 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Genitourinary and Obstetric Radiology
Badade, Anirudh B
Bhide, Amar
Satoskar, Purnima
Wadekar, Darshan
Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles
title Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles
title_full Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles
title_fullStr Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles
title_short Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles
title_sort validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles
topic Genitourinary and Obstetric Radiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3843338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24347860
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.120270
work_keys_str_mv AT badadeanirudhb validationoftheglobalreferenceforfetalweightandbirthweightpercentiles
AT bhideamar validationoftheglobalreferenceforfetalweightandbirthweightpercentiles
AT satoskarpurnima validationoftheglobalreferenceforfetalweightandbirthweightpercentiles
AT wadekardarshan validationoftheglobalreferenceforfetalweightandbirthweightpercentiles