Cargando…

Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Positron emission tomography (PET) with choline tracers has found widespread use for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). However, choline metabolism is not increased in a considerable number of cases, whereas prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is overexpressed in most PCs. Therefo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Afshar-Oromieh, Ali, Zechmann, Christian M., Malcher, Anna, Eder, Matthias, Eisenhut, Michael, Linhart, Heinz G., Holland-Letz, Tim, Hadaschik, Boris A., Giesel, Frederik L., Debus, Jürgen, Haberkorn, Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3843747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24072344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2525-5
_version_ 1782293098626285568
author Afshar-Oromieh, Ali
Zechmann, Christian M.
Malcher, Anna
Eder, Matthias
Eisenhut, Michael
Linhart, Heinz G.
Holland-Letz, Tim
Hadaschik, Boris A.
Giesel, Frederik L.
Debus, Jürgen
Haberkorn, Uwe
author_facet Afshar-Oromieh, Ali
Zechmann, Christian M.
Malcher, Anna
Eder, Matthias
Eisenhut, Michael
Linhart, Heinz G.
Holland-Letz, Tim
Hadaschik, Boris A.
Giesel, Frederik L.
Debus, Jürgen
Haberkorn, Uwe
author_sort Afshar-Oromieh, Ali
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Positron emission tomography (PET) with choline tracers has found widespread use for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). However, choline metabolism is not increased in a considerable number of cases, whereas prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is overexpressed in most PCs. Therefore, a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand could be superior to choline tracers by obtaining a high contrast. The aim of this study was to compare such a novel tracer with standard choline-based PET/CT. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with biochemical relapse of PC [mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 11.1 ± 24.1 ng/ml, range 0.01–116] were retrospectively analysed after (18)F-fluoromethylcholine and (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT within a time window of 30 days. Radiotracer uptake that was visually considered as PC was semi-quantitatively analysed by measuring the maximum standardized uptake values (SUV(max)) of the scans acquired 1 h after injection of (68)Ga-PSMA complex solution (median 132 MBq, range 59–263 MBq) and (18)F-fluoromethylcholine (median 237 MBq, range 114–374 MBq), respectively. In addition, tumour to background ratios were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 78 lesions characteristic for PC were detected in 32 patients using (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 56 lesions were detected in 26 patients using choline PET/CT. The higher detection rate in (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT was statistically significant (p = 0.04). In five patients no lesion was found with both methods. All lesions detected by (18)F-fluoromethylcholine PET/CT were also seen by (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT. In (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT SUV(max) was clearly (>10 %) higher in 62 of 78 lesions (79.1 %) and the tumour to background ratio was clearly (>10 %) higher in 74 of 78 lesions (94.9 %) when compared to (18)F-fluoromethylcholine PET/CT. CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT can detect lesions characteristic for PC with improved contrast when compared to standard (18)F-fluoromethylcholine PET/CT, especially at low PSA levels. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00259-013-2525-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3843747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38437472013-12-04 Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer Afshar-Oromieh, Ali Zechmann, Christian M. Malcher, Anna Eder, Matthias Eisenhut, Michael Linhart, Heinz G. Holland-Letz, Tim Hadaschik, Boris A. Giesel, Frederik L. Debus, Jürgen Haberkorn, Uwe Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: Positron emission tomography (PET) with choline tracers has found widespread use for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). However, choline metabolism is not increased in a considerable number of cases, whereas prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is overexpressed in most PCs. Therefore, a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand could be superior to choline tracers by obtaining a high contrast. The aim of this study was to compare such a novel tracer with standard choline-based PET/CT. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with biochemical relapse of PC [mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 11.1 ± 24.1 ng/ml, range 0.01–116] were retrospectively analysed after (18)F-fluoromethylcholine and (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT within a time window of 30 days. Radiotracer uptake that was visually considered as PC was semi-quantitatively analysed by measuring the maximum standardized uptake values (SUV(max)) of the scans acquired 1 h after injection of (68)Ga-PSMA complex solution (median 132 MBq, range 59–263 MBq) and (18)F-fluoromethylcholine (median 237 MBq, range 114–374 MBq), respectively. In addition, tumour to background ratios were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 78 lesions characteristic for PC were detected in 32 patients using (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 56 lesions were detected in 26 patients using choline PET/CT. The higher detection rate in (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT was statistically significant (p = 0.04). In five patients no lesion was found with both methods. All lesions detected by (18)F-fluoromethylcholine PET/CT were also seen by (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT. In (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT SUV(max) was clearly (>10 %) higher in 62 of 78 lesions (79.1 %) and the tumour to background ratio was clearly (>10 %) higher in 74 of 78 lesions (94.9 %) when compared to (18)F-fluoromethylcholine PET/CT. CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT can detect lesions characteristic for PC with improved contrast when compared to standard (18)F-fluoromethylcholine PET/CT, especially at low PSA levels. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00259-013-2525-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-09-27 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3843747/ /pubmed/24072344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2525-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Afshar-Oromieh, Ali
Zechmann, Christian M.
Malcher, Anna
Eder, Matthias
Eisenhut, Michael
Linhart, Heinz G.
Holland-Letz, Tim
Hadaschik, Boris A.
Giesel, Frederik L.
Debus, Jürgen
Haberkorn, Uwe
Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer
title Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer
title_full Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer
title_short Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer
title_sort comparison of pet imaging with a (68)ga-labelled psma ligand and (18)f-choline-based pet/ct for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3843747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24072344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2525-5
work_keys_str_mv AT afsharoromiehali comparisonofpetimagingwitha68galabelledpsmaligandand18fcholinebasedpetctforthediagnosisofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT zechmannchristianm comparisonofpetimagingwitha68galabelledpsmaligandand18fcholinebasedpetctforthediagnosisofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT malcheranna comparisonofpetimagingwitha68galabelledpsmaligandand18fcholinebasedpetctforthediagnosisofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT edermatthias comparisonofpetimagingwitha68galabelledpsmaligandand18fcholinebasedpetctforthediagnosisofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT eisenhutmichael comparisonofpetimagingwitha68galabelledpsmaligandand18fcholinebasedpetctforthediagnosisofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT linhartheinzg comparisonofpetimagingwitha68galabelledpsmaligandand18fcholinebasedpetctforthediagnosisofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT hollandletztim comparisonofpetimagingwitha68galabelledpsmaligandand18fcholinebasedpetctforthediagnosisofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT hadaschikborisa comparisonofpetimagingwitha68galabelledpsmaligandand18fcholinebasedpetctforthediagnosisofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT gieselfrederikl comparisonofpetimagingwitha68galabelledpsmaligandand18fcholinebasedpetctforthediagnosisofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT debusjurgen comparisonofpetimagingwitha68galabelledpsmaligandand18fcholinebasedpetctforthediagnosisofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT haberkornuwe comparisonofpetimagingwitha68galabelledpsmaligandand18fcholinebasedpetctforthediagnosisofrecurrentprostatecancer