Cargando…

A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, parallel-group study of the effectiveness of a pharmacist-acquired medication history in an emergency department

BACKGROUND: Admission to an emergency department (ED) is a key vulnerable moment when patients are at increased risk of medication discrepancies and medication histories are an effective way of ensuring that fewer errors are made. This study measured whether a pharmacist-acquired medication history...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becerra-Camargo, Jesus, Martinez-Martinez, Fernando, Garcia-Jimenez, Emilio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3844415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23984830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-337
_version_ 1782293178220544000
author Becerra-Camargo, Jesus
Martinez-Martinez, Fernando
Garcia-Jimenez, Emilio
author_facet Becerra-Camargo, Jesus
Martinez-Martinez, Fernando
Garcia-Jimenez, Emilio
author_sort Becerra-Camargo, Jesus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Admission to an emergency department (ED) is a key vulnerable moment when patients are at increased risk of medication discrepancies and medication histories are an effective way of ensuring that fewer errors are made. This study measured whether a pharmacist-acquired medication history in an ED focusing on a patient’s current home medication regimen, and available to be used by a doctor when consulting in the ED, would reduce the number of patients having at least 1 medication discrepancy related to home medication. METHODS: This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled parallel-group study was conducted at 3 large teaching hospitals. Two hundred and seventy participants were randomly allocated to an intervention (n = 134) or a standard care (n = 136) arm. All consecutive patients >18 years old admitted through the ED were eligible. The intervention consisted of pharmacists conducting a standardised comprehensive medication history interview focusing on a patient’s current home medication regimen, prior to being seen by a doctor. Data recorded on the admission medication order form was available to be used by a doctor during consultation in the ED. The admission medication order form was given to doctors at a later stage in the control arm for them to amend prescriptions. The effect of the intervention was assessed primarily by comparing the number of patients having at least 1 admission medication discrepancy regarding medication being taken at home. Secondary outcomes concerned the characteristics and clinical severity of such medication discrepancies. RESULTS: The intervention reduced discrepancies occurring by 33% (p < 0.0001; 0.1055 odds ratio, 0.05-0.24 95% confidence interval), despite recall bias. Regarding total discrepancies, omitting medication occurred most frequently (55.1%) and most discrepancies (42.7%) were judged to have the potential to cause moderate discomfort or clinical deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacist-acquired medication history in an ED focusing on a patient’s current home medication regimen available to be used by a doctor at the time of consulting in the ED reduced the number of patients having at least 1 home medication-related discrepancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN63455839.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3844415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38444152013-12-02 A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, parallel-group study of the effectiveness of a pharmacist-acquired medication history in an emergency department Becerra-Camargo, Jesus Martinez-Martinez, Fernando Garcia-Jimenez, Emilio BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Admission to an emergency department (ED) is a key vulnerable moment when patients are at increased risk of medication discrepancies and medication histories are an effective way of ensuring that fewer errors are made. This study measured whether a pharmacist-acquired medication history in an ED focusing on a patient’s current home medication regimen, and available to be used by a doctor when consulting in the ED, would reduce the number of patients having at least 1 medication discrepancy related to home medication. METHODS: This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled parallel-group study was conducted at 3 large teaching hospitals. Two hundred and seventy participants were randomly allocated to an intervention (n = 134) or a standard care (n = 136) arm. All consecutive patients >18 years old admitted through the ED were eligible. The intervention consisted of pharmacists conducting a standardised comprehensive medication history interview focusing on a patient’s current home medication regimen, prior to being seen by a doctor. Data recorded on the admission medication order form was available to be used by a doctor during consultation in the ED. The admission medication order form was given to doctors at a later stage in the control arm for them to amend prescriptions. The effect of the intervention was assessed primarily by comparing the number of patients having at least 1 admission medication discrepancy regarding medication being taken at home. Secondary outcomes concerned the characteristics and clinical severity of such medication discrepancies. RESULTS: The intervention reduced discrepancies occurring by 33% (p < 0.0001; 0.1055 odds ratio, 0.05-0.24 95% confidence interval), despite recall bias. Regarding total discrepancies, omitting medication occurred most frequently (55.1%) and most discrepancies (42.7%) were judged to have the potential to cause moderate discomfort or clinical deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacist-acquired medication history in an ED focusing on a patient’s current home medication regimen available to be used by a doctor at the time of consulting in the ED reduced the number of patients having at least 1 home medication-related discrepancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN63455839. BioMed Central 2013-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3844415/ /pubmed/23984830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-337 Text en Copyright © 2013 Becerra-Camargo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Becerra-Camargo, Jesus
Martinez-Martinez, Fernando
Garcia-Jimenez, Emilio
A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, parallel-group study of the effectiveness of a pharmacist-acquired medication history in an emergency department
title A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, parallel-group study of the effectiveness of a pharmacist-acquired medication history in an emergency department
title_full A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, parallel-group study of the effectiveness of a pharmacist-acquired medication history in an emergency department
title_fullStr A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, parallel-group study of the effectiveness of a pharmacist-acquired medication history in an emergency department
title_full_unstemmed A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, parallel-group study of the effectiveness of a pharmacist-acquired medication history in an emergency department
title_short A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, parallel-group study of the effectiveness of a pharmacist-acquired medication history in an emergency department
title_sort multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, parallel-group study of the effectiveness of a pharmacist-acquired medication history in an emergency department
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3844415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23984830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-337
work_keys_str_mv AT becerracamargojesus amulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledparallelgroupstudyoftheeffectivenessofapharmacistacquiredmedicationhistoryinanemergencydepartment
AT martinezmartinezfernando amulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledparallelgroupstudyoftheeffectivenessofapharmacistacquiredmedicationhistoryinanemergencydepartment
AT garciajimenezemilio amulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledparallelgroupstudyoftheeffectivenessofapharmacistacquiredmedicationhistoryinanemergencydepartment
AT becerracamargojesus multicentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledparallelgroupstudyoftheeffectivenessofapharmacistacquiredmedicationhistoryinanemergencydepartment
AT martinezmartinezfernando multicentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledparallelgroupstudyoftheeffectivenessofapharmacistacquiredmedicationhistoryinanemergencydepartment
AT garciajimenezemilio multicentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledparallelgroupstudyoftheeffectivenessofapharmacistacquiredmedicationhistoryinanemergencydepartment