Cargando…
Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates tactile synchronization
BACKGROUND: Temporal order judgement (TOJ) is the ability to detect the order of occurrence of two sequentially delivered stimuli. Previous research has shown that TOJ in the presence of synchronized periodic conditioning stimuli impairs TOJ performance, and this phenomenon is suggested to be mediat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3844444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23968301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-89 |
_version_ | 1782293183883902976 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Kevin GH Jacobs, Mark F Asmussen, Michael J Zapallow, Christopher M Tommerdahl, Mark Nelson, Aimee J |
author_facet | Lee, Kevin GH Jacobs, Mark F Asmussen, Michael J Zapallow, Christopher M Tommerdahl, Mark Nelson, Aimee J |
author_sort | Lee, Kevin GH |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Temporal order judgement (TOJ) is the ability to detect the order of occurrence of two sequentially delivered stimuli. Previous research has shown that TOJ in the presence of synchronized periodic conditioning stimuli impairs TOJ performance, and this phenomenon is suggested to be mediated by GABAergic interneurons that cause perceptual binding across the two skin sites. Application of continuous theta-burst repetitive TMS (cTBS) over primary somatosensory cortex (SI) alters temporal and spatial tactile perception. The purpose of this study was to examine TOJ perception in the presence and absence of synchronized periodic conditioning stimuli before and after cTBS applied over left-hemisphere SI. A TOJ task was administered on the right index and middle finger (D2 and D3) in two separate sessions in the presence and absence of conditioning stimuli (a background low amplitude sinusoidal vibration). RESULTS: CTBS reduced the impact of the conditioning stimuli on TOJ performance for up to 18 minutes following stimulation while sham cTBS did not affect TOJ performance. In contrast, the TOJ task performed in the absence of synchronized conditioning stimulation was unaltered following cTBS. CONCLUSION: We conclude that cTBS suppresses inhibitory networks in SI that mediate perceptual binding during TOJ synchronization. CTBS offers one method to suppress cortical excitability in the cortex and potentially benefit clinical populations with altered inhibitory cortical circuits. Additionally, TOJ measures with conditioning stimuli may provide an avenue to assess sensory processing in neurologically impaired patient populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3844444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38444442013-12-02 Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates tactile synchronization Lee, Kevin GH Jacobs, Mark F Asmussen, Michael J Zapallow, Christopher M Tommerdahl, Mark Nelson, Aimee J BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Temporal order judgement (TOJ) is the ability to detect the order of occurrence of two sequentially delivered stimuli. Previous research has shown that TOJ in the presence of synchronized periodic conditioning stimuli impairs TOJ performance, and this phenomenon is suggested to be mediated by GABAergic interneurons that cause perceptual binding across the two skin sites. Application of continuous theta-burst repetitive TMS (cTBS) over primary somatosensory cortex (SI) alters temporal and spatial tactile perception. The purpose of this study was to examine TOJ perception in the presence and absence of synchronized periodic conditioning stimuli before and after cTBS applied over left-hemisphere SI. A TOJ task was administered on the right index and middle finger (D2 and D3) in two separate sessions in the presence and absence of conditioning stimuli (a background low amplitude sinusoidal vibration). RESULTS: CTBS reduced the impact of the conditioning stimuli on TOJ performance for up to 18 minutes following stimulation while sham cTBS did not affect TOJ performance. In contrast, the TOJ task performed in the absence of synchronized conditioning stimulation was unaltered following cTBS. CONCLUSION: We conclude that cTBS suppresses inhibitory networks in SI that mediate perceptual binding during TOJ synchronization. CTBS offers one method to suppress cortical excitability in the cortex and potentially benefit clinical populations with altered inhibitory cortical circuits. Additionally, TOJ measures with conditioning stimuli may provide an avenue to assess sensory processing in neurologically impaired patient populations. BioMed Central 2013-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3844444/ /pubmed/23968301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-89 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Kevin GH Jacobs, Mark F Asmussen, Michael J Zapallow, Christopher M Tommerdahl, Mark Nelson, Aimee J Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates tactile synchronization |
title | Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates tactile synchronization |
title_full | Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates tactile synchronization |
title_fullStr | Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates tactile synchronization |
title_full_unstemmed | Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates tactile synchronization |
title_short | Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates tactile synchronization |
title_sort | continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates tactile synchronization |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3844444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23968301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-89 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leekevingh continuousthetaburststimulationmodulatestactilesynchronization AT jacobsmarkf continuousthetaburststimulationmodulatestactilesynchronization AT asmussenmichaelj continuousthetaburststimulationmodulatestactilesynchronization AT zapallowchristopherm continuousthetaburststimulationmodulatestactilesynchronization AT tommerdahlmark continuousthetaburststimulationmodulatestactilesynchronization AT nelsonaimeej continuousthetaburststimulationmodulatestactilesynchronization |