Cargando…

Canada and access to medicines in developing countries: intellectual property rights first

Canadian reports have recommended that health as a human right must be Canada’s overarching global commitment and that the primacy of human rights should be prioritized over other elements of international law including international trade and investment law as it applies to access to pharmaceutical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lexchin, Joel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3844468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24007595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-9-42
_version_ 1782293189324963840
author Lexchin, Joel
author_facet Lexchin, Joel
author_sort Lexchin, Joel
collection PubMed
description Canadian reports have recommended that health as a human right must be Canada’s overarching global commitment and that the primacy of human rights should be prioritized over other elements of international law including international trade and investment law as it applies to access to pharmaceuticals. This paper uses a series of case reports to examine Canada’s commitment to this goal. Specifically it examines cases where improved access has been in conflict with increased intellectual property rights. The 6 cases are: Canada’s position when 39 pharmaceutical companies took South Africa to court in 1998 over its legislation to allow parallel importation of patented medicines and to regulate the price of medications; the stance that Canada took in the negotiations around the Doha Declaration in 2001; the passage of Canada’s Access to Medicines Regime in 2004 and subsequent attempts to amend the legislation in 2011 and 2012; Canada’s involvement in the final declaration at the United Nations High-Level meeting on non-communicable diseases in 2012; Canada’s views about the terms in the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement as expressed in 2009; and Canada’s 2013 position on the extension of the exemption for least developed countries from having to comply with the terms of the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement. In the first case Canada was neutral but in the remaining 5 cases Canada prioritized intellectual property rights over access. This position is consistent with how Canada has acted around domestic issues involving intellectual property rights for pharmaceutical products. Canada has supported strengthened rights despite the fact that their touted benefits have not been realized either domestically or in developing countries. As a result Canada has failed in its humanitarian duty to protect the human right to health in the form of safe and low cost medicines for the people in developing countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3844468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38444682013-12-02 Canada and access to medicines in developing countries: intellectual property rights first Lexchin, Joel Global Health Debate Canadian reports have recommended that health as a human right must be Canada’s overarching global commitment and that the primacy of human rights should be prioritized over other elements of international law including international trade and investment law as it applies to access to pharmaceuticals. This paper uses a series of case reports to examine Canada’s commitment to this goal. Specifically it examines cases where improved access has been in conflict with increased intellectual property rights. The 6 cases are: Canada’s position when 39 pharmaceutical companies took South Africa to court in 1998 over its legislation to allow parallel importation of patented medicines and to regulate the price of medications; the stance that Canada took in the negotiations around the Doha Declaration in 2001; the passage of Canada’s Access to Medicines Regime in 2004 and subsequent attempts to amend the legislation in 2011 and 2012; Canada’s involvement in the final declaration at the United Nations High-Level meeting on non-communicable diseases in 2012; Canada’s views about the terms in the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement as expressed in 2009; and Canada’s 2013 position on the extension of the exemption for least developed countries from having to comply with the terms of the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement. In the first case Canada was neutral but in the remaining 5 cases Canada prioritized intellectual property rights over access. This position is consistent with how Canada has acted around domestic issues involving intellectual property rights for pharmaceutical products. Canada has supported strengthened rights despite the fact that their touted benefits have not been realized either domestically or in developing countries. As a result Canada has failed in its humanitarian duty to protect the human right to health in the form of safe and low cost medicines for the people in developing countries. BioMed Central 2013-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3844468/ /pubmed/24007595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-9-42 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lexchin; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Lexchin, Joel
Canada and access to medicines in developing countries: intellectual property rights first
title Canada and access to medicines in developing countries: intellectual property rights first
title_full Canada and access to medicines in developing countries: intellectual property rights first
title_fullStr Canada and access to medicines in developing countries: intellectual property rights first
title_full_unstemmed Canada and access to medicines in developing countries: intellectual property rights first
title_short Canada and access to medicines in developing countries: intellectual property rights first
title_sort canada and access to medicines in developing countries: intellectual property rights first
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3844468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24007595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-9-42
work_keys_str_mv AT lexchinjoel canadaandaccesstomedicinesindevelopingcountriesintellectualpropertyrightsfirst