Cargando…

Characterisation of a Vitrocell® VC 10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis

BACKGROUND: The development of whole smoke exposure systems have been driven by the fact that traditional smoke exposure techniques are based on the particulate phase of tobacco smoke and not the complete smoke aerosol. To overcome these challenges in this study, we used a Vitrocell® VC 10 whole smo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thorne, David, Kilford, Joanne, Payne, Rebecca, Adamson, Jason, Scott, Ken, Dalrymple, Annette, Meredith, Clive, Dillon, Deborah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3844484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24004496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-7-146
_version_ 1782293192922628096
author Thorne, David
Kilford, Joanne
Payne, Rebecca
Adamson, Jason
Scott, Ken
Dalrymple, Annette
Meredith, Clive
Dillon, Deborah
author_facet Thorne, David
Kilford, Joanne
Payne, Rebecca
Adamson, Jason
Scott, Ken
Dalrymple, Annette
Meredith, Clive
Dillon, Deborah
author_sort Thorne, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The development of whole smoke exposure systems have been driven by the fact that traditional smoke exposure techniques are based on the particulate phase of tobacco smoke and not the complete smoke aerosol. To overcome these challenges in this study, we used a Vitrocell® VC 10 whole smoke exposure system. For characterisation purposes, we determined smoke deposition in relationship to airflow (L/min), regional smoke deposition within the linear exposure module, vapour phase dilution using a known smoke marker (carbon monoxide) and finally assessed biological responses using two independent biological systems, the Ames and Neutral Red uptake (NRU) assay. RESULTS: Smoke dilution correlates with particulate deposition (R(2) = 0.97) and CO concentration (R(2) = 0.98). Regional deposition analysis within the linear exposure chamber showed no statistical difference in deposited mass across the chamber at any airflows tested. Biological analysis showed consistent responses and positive correlations with deposited mass for both the Ames (R(2) = 0.76) and NRU (R(2) = 0.84) assays. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in our study, under the experimental conditions tested, the VC 10 can produce stable tobacco smoke dilutions, as demonstrated by particulate deposition, measured vapour phase smoke marker delivery and biological responses from two independent in vitro test systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3844484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38444842013-12-02 Characterisation of a Vitrocell® VC 10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis Thorne, David Kilford, Joanne Payne, Rebecca Adamson, Jason Scott, Ken Dalrymple, Annette Meredith, Clive Dillon, Deborah Chem Cent J Research Article BACKGROUND: The development of whole smoke exposure systems have been driven by the fact that traditional smoke exposure techniques are based on the particulate phase of tobacco smoke and not the complete smoke aerosol. To overcome these challenges in this study, we used a Vitrocell® VC 10 whole smoke exposure system. For characterisation purposes, we determined smoke deposition in relationship to airflow (L/min), regional smoke deposition within the linear exposure module, vapour phase dilution using a known smoke marker (carbon monoxide) and finally assessed biological responses using two independent biological systems, the Ames and Neutral Red uptake (NRU) assay. RESULTS: Smoke dilution correlates with particulate deposition (R(2) = 0.97) and CO concentration (R(2) = 0.98). Regional deposition analysis within the linear exposure chamber showed no statistical difference in deposited mass across the chamber at any airflows tested. Biological analysis showed consistent responses and positive correlations with deposited mass for both the Ames (R(2) = 0.76) and NRU (R(2) = 0.84) assays. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in our study, under the experimental conditions tested, the VC 10 can produce stable tobacco smoke dilutions, as demonstrated by particulate deposition, measured vapour phase smoke marker delivery and biological responses from two independent in vitro test systems. BioMed Central 2013-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3844484/ /pubmed/24004496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-7-146 Text en Copyright © 2013 Thorne et al.; licensee Chemistry Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thorne, David
Kilford, Joanne
Payne, Rebecca
Adamson, Jason
Scott, Ken
Dalrymple, Annette
Meredith, Clive
Dillon, Deborah
Characterisation of a Vitrocell® VC 10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis
title Characterisation of a Vitrocell® VC 10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis
title_full Characterisation of a Vitrocell® VC 10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis
title_fullStr Characterisation of a Vitrocell® VC 10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis
title_full_unstemmed Characterisation of a Vitrocell® VC 10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis
title_short Characterisation of a Vitrocell® VC 10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis
title_sort characterisation of a vitrocell® vc 10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3844484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24004496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-7-146
work_keys_str_mv AT thornedavid characterisationofavitrocellvc10invitrosmokeexposuresystemusingdosetoolsandbiologicalanalysis
AT kilfordjoanne characterisationofavitrocellvc10invitrosmokeexposuresystemusingdosetoolsandbiologicalanalysis
AT paynerebecca characterisationofavitrocellvc10invitrosmokeexposuresystemusingdosetoolsandbiologicalanalysis
AT adamsonjason characterisationofavitrocellvc10invitrosmokeexposuresystemusingdosetoolsandbiologicalanalysis
AT scottken characterisationofavitrocellvc10invitrosmokeexposuresystemusingdosetoolsandbiologicalanalysis
AT dalrympleannette characterisationofavitrocellvc10invitrosmokeexposuresystemusingdosetoolsandbiologicalanalysis
AT meredithclive characterisationofavitrocellvc10invitrosmokeexposuresystemusingdosetoolsandbiologicalanalysis
AT dillondeborah characterisationofavitrocellvc10invitrosmokeexposuresystemusingdosetoolsandbiologicalanalysis