Cargando…
Increasing the dose of acute rehabilitation: is there a benefit?
Rehabilitation interventions, including physiotherapy and occupational therapy, can improve patient outcomes; however, the optimal duration and frequency of inpatient rehabilitation interventions is uncertain. In a recent randomized controlled trial published in BMC Medicine, 996 patients in two pub...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3844507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24228867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-199 |
_version_ | 1782293198116225024 |
---|---|
author | Parker, Ann M Lord, Robert K Needham, Dale M |
author_facet | Parker, Ann M Lord, Robert K Needham, Dale M |
author_sort | Parker, Ann M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rehabilitation interventions, including physiotherapy and occupational therapy, can improve patient outcomes; however, the optimal duration and frequency of inpatient rehabilitation interventions is uncertain. In a recent randomized controlled trial published in BMC Medicine, 996 patients in two publicly-funded Australian metropolitan rehabilitation facilities were assigned to physiotherapy and occupational therapy delivered Monday through Friday (five days/week control group) versus Monday through Saturday (six days/week intervention group). This increased dose of rehabilitation in the intervention group resulted in greater functional independence and quality of life at discharge, with a trend towards significant improvement at six-month follow-up. Moreover, the length of stay for the intervention group was shorter by two days (95% CI 0 to 4, P = 0.10). Hence, in the acute inpatient rehabilitation setting, a larger dose of physiotherapy and occupational therapy, via six versus five days/week treatment, improves patient outcomes and potentially reduces overall length of stay and costs. Please see related research: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/198. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3844507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38445072013-12-06 Increasing the dose of acute rehabilitation: is there a benefit? Parker, Ann M Lord, Robert K Needham, Dale M BMC Med Commentary Rehabilitation interventions, including physiotherapy and occupational therapy, can improve patient outcomes; however, the optimal duration and frequency of inpatient rehabilitation interventions is uncertain. In a recent randomized controlled trial published in BMC Medicine, 996 patients in two publicly-funded Australian metropolitan rehabilitation facilities were assigned to physiotherapy and occupational therapy delivered Monday through Friday (five days/week control group) versus Monday through Saturday (six days/week intervention group). This increased dose of rehabilitation in the intervention group resulted in greater functional independence and quality of life at discharge, with a trend towards significant improvement at six-month follow-up. Moreover, the length of stay for the intervention group was shorter by two days (95% CI 0 to 4, P = 0.10). Hence, in the acute inpatient rehabilitation setting, a larger dose of physiotherapy and occupational therapy, via six versus five days/week treatment, improves patient outcomes and potentially reduces overall length of stay and costs. Please see related research: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/198. BioMed Central 2013-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3844507/ /pubmed/24228867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-199 Text en Copyright © 2013 Parker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Parker, Ann M Lord, Robert K Needham, Dale M Increasing the dose of acute rehabilitation: is there a benefit? |
title | Increasing the dose of acute rehabilitation: is there a benefit? |
title_full | Increasing the dose of acute rehabilitation: is there a benefit? |
title_fullStr | Increasing the dose of acute rehabilitation: is there a benefit? |
title_full_unstemmed | Increasing the dose of acute rehabilitation: is there a benefit? |
title_short | Increasing the dose of acute rehabilitation: is there a benefit? |
title_sort | increasing the dose of acute rehabilitation: is there a benefit? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3844507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24228867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkerannm increasingthedoseofacuterehabilitationisthereabenefit AT lordrobertk increasingthedoseofacuterehabilitationisthereabenefit AT needhamdalem increasingthedoseofacuterehabilitationisthereabenefit |