Cargando…

The effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) reduce levels of androgen, especially testosterone (T), by inhibiting ovarian and adrenal androgen synthesis and by increasing levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Although this suppressive effect has been investigated by numerous studies ove...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zimmerman, Y., Eijkemans, M.J.C., Coelingh Bennink, H.J.T., Blankenstein, M.A., Fauser, B.C.J.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3845679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24082040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt038
_version_ 1782293347959832576
author Zimmerman, Y.
Eijkemans, M.J.C.
Coelingh Bennink, H.J.T.
Blankenstein, M.A.
Fauser, B.C.J.M.
author_facet Zimmerman, Y.
Eijkemans, M.J.C.
Coelingh Bennink, H.J.T.
Blankenstein, M.A.
Fauser, B.C.J.M.
author_sort Zimmerman, Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) reduce levels of androgen, especially testosterone (T), by inhibiting ovarian and adrenal androgen synthesis and by increasing levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Although this suppressive effect has been investigated by numerous studies over many years, to our knowledge no systematic review concerning this issue had been performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of COCs on concentrations of total T, free T and SHBG in healthy women and to evaluate differences between the various types of COCs (e.g. estrogen dose, type of progestin) and the assays used to assess total T and free T. METHODS: A review of the literature was performed using database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials) and all publications (from inception date until July 2012) investigating the effect of COCs on androgen levels in healthy women were considered eligible for selection. Three reviewers were involved in study selection, data extraction and critical appraisal. For the meta-analysis, data on total T, free T and SHBG were extracted and combined using random effects analysis. Additional subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate differences between the various types of COCs (e.g. estrogen dose, type of progestin) and the assays used to assess total T or free T. RESULTS: A total of 151 records were identified by systematic review and 42 studies with a total of 1495 healthy young women (age range: 18–40 years) were included in the meta-analysis. All included studies were experimental studies and 21 were non-comparative. Pooling of the results derived from all the included papers showed that total T levels significantly decreased during COC use [mean difference (MD) (95% confidence interval, CI) −0.49 nmol/l (−0.55, −0.42); P < 0.001]. Significantly lower levels of free T were also found [relative change (95% CI) 0.39 (0.35, 0.43); P < 0.001], with a mean decrease of 61%. On the contrary, SHBG concentrations significantly increased during all types of COC use [MD (95% CI) 99.08 nmol/l (86.43, 111.73); P < 0.001]. Subgroup analyses revealed that COCs containing 20–25 µg EE had similar effects on total and free T compared with COCs with 30–35 µg EE. In addition, suppressive effects on T levels were not different when comparing different types of progestins. However, subgroup analyses for the estrogen dose and the progestin type in relation to changes in SHBG levels did show significant differences: COCs containing second generation progestins and/or the lower estrogen doses (20–25 µg EE) were found to have less impact on SHBG concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The current literature review and meta-analysis demonstrates that COCs decrease circulating levels of total T and free T and increase SBHG concentrations. Due to the SHBG increase, free T levels decrease twice as much as total T. The estrogen dose and progestin type of the COC do not influence the decline of total and free T, but both affect SHBG. The clinical implications of suppressed androgen levels during COC use remain to be elucidated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3845679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38456792013-12-02 The effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zimmerman, Y. Eijkemans, M.J.C. Coelingh Bennink, H.J.T. Blankenstein, M.A. Fauser, B.C.J.M. Hum Reprod Update Reviews BACKGROUND: Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) reduce levels of androgen, especially testosterone (T), by inhibiting ovarian and adrenal androgen synthesis and by increasing levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Although this suppressive effect has been investigated by numerous studies over many years, to our knowledge no systematic review concerning this issue had been performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of COCs on concentrations of total T, free T and SHBG in healthy women and to evaluate differences between the various types of COCs (e.g. estrogen dose, type of progestin) and the assays used to assess total T and free T. METHODS: A review of the literature was performed using database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials) and all publications (from inception date until July 2012) investigating the effect of COCs on androgen levels in healthy women were considered eligible for selection. Three reviewers were involved in study selection, data extraction and critical appraisal. For the meta-analysis, data on total T, free T and SHBG were extracted and combined using random effects analysis. Additional subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate differences between the various types of COCs (e.g. estrogen dose, type of progestin) and the assays used to assess total T or free T. RESULTS: A total of 151 records were identified by systematic review and 42 studies with a total of 1495 healthy young women (age range: 18–40 years) were included in the meta-analysis. All included studies were experimental studies and 21 were non-comparative. Pooling of the results derived from all the included papers showed that total T levels significantly decreased during COC use [mean difference (MD) (95% confidence interval, CI) −0.49 nmol/l (−0.55, −0.42); P < 0.001]. Significantly lower levels of free T were also found [relative change (95% CI) 0.39 (0.35, 0.43); P < 0.001], with a mean decrease of 61%. On the contrary, SHBG concentrations significantly increased during all types of COC use [MD (95% CI) 99.08 nmol/l (86.43, 111.73); P < 0.001]. Subgroup analyses revealed that COCs containing 20–25 µg EE had similar effects on total and free T compared with COCs with 30–35 µg EE. In addition, suppressive effects on T levels were not different when comparing different types of progestins. However, subgroup analyses for the estrogen dose and the progestin type in relation to changes in SHBG levels did show significant differences: COCs containing second generation progestins and/or the lower estrogen doses (20–25 µg EE) were found to have less impact on SHBG concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The current literature review and meta-analysis demonstrates that COCs decrease circulating levels of total T and free T and increase SBHG concentrations. Due to the SHBG increase, free T levels decrease twice as much as total T. The estrogen dose and progestin type of the COC do not influence the decline of total and free T, but both affect SHBG. The clinical implications of suppressed androgen levels during COC use remain to be elucidated. Oxford University Press 2014-01 2013-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3845679/ /pubmed/24082040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt038 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Reviews
Zimmerman, Y.
Eijkemans, M.J.C.
Coelingh Bennink, H.J.T.
Blankenstein, M.A.
Fauser, B.C.J.M.
The effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3845679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24082040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt038
work_keys_str_mv AT zimmermany theeffectofcombinedoralcontraceptionontestosteronelevelsinhealthywomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eijkemansmjc theeffectofcombinedoralcontraceptionontestosteronelevelsinhealthywomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT coelinghbenninkhjt theeffectofcombinedoralcontraceptionontestosteronelevelsinhealthywomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT blankensteinma theeffectofcombinedoralcontraceptionontestosteronelevelsinhealthywomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fauserbcjm theeffectofcombinedoralcontraceptionontestosteronelevelsinhealthywomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zimmermany effectofcombinedoralcontraceptionontestosteronelevelsinhealthywomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eijkemansmjc effectofcombinedoralcontraceptionontestosteronelevelsinhealthywomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT coelinghbenninkhjt effectofcombinedoralcontraceptionontestosteronelevelsinhealthywomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT blankensteinma effectofcombinedoralcontraceptionontestosteronelevelsinhealthywomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fauserbcjm effectofcombinedoralcontraceptionontestosteronelevelsinhealthywomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis