Cargando…
Covered Metal Stenting for Malignant Lower Biliary Stricture with Pancreatic Duct Obstruction: Is Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Needed?
Aims. To evaluate the need for endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) before covered self-expandable metal stent (CSEMS) deployment for malignant lower biliary stricture with pancreatic duct obstruction. Methods. This study included 79 patients who underwent CSEMS deployment for unresectable malignant lowe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3845734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/375613 |
_version_ | 1782293358341783552 |
---|---|
author | Nakahara, Kazunari Okuse, Chiaki Suetani, Keigo Michikawa, Yosuke Kobayashi, Shinjiro Otsubo, Takehito Itoh, Fumio |
author_facet | Nakahara, Kazunari Okuse, Chiaki Suetani, Keigo Michikawa, Yosuke Kobayashi, Shinjiro Otsubo, Takehito Itoh, Fumio |
author_sort | Nakahara, Kazunari |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aims. To evaluate the need for endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) before covered self-expandable metal stent (CSEMS) deployment for malignant lower biliary stricture with pancreatic duct obstruction. Methods. This study included 79 patients who underwent CSEMS deployment for unresectable malignant lower biliary stricture with pancreatic duct obstruction. Treatment outcomes and complications were compared between 38 patients with EST before CSEMS deployment (EST group) and 41 without EST (non-EST group). Results. The technical success rates were 100% in both the EST and the non-EST group. The incidence of pancreatitis was 2.6% in the EST, and 2.4% in the non-EST group (P = 0.51). The incidences of overall complications were 18.4% and 14.6%, respectively, (P = 0.65). Within the non-EST groups, the incidence of pancreatitis was 0% in patients with fully covered stent deployment and 3.6% in those with partially covered stent deployment (P = 0.69). In the multivariate analysis, younger age (P = 0.003, OR 12) and nonpancreatic cancer (P = 0.001, OR 24) were significant risk factors for overall complications after CSEMS deployment. EST was not identified as a risk factor. Conclusions. EST did not reduce the incidence of pancreatitis after CSEMS deployment in patients of unresectable distal malignant obstruction with pancreatic duct obstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3845734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38457342013-12-09 Covered Metal Stenting for Malignant Lower Biliary Stricture with Pancreatic Duct Obstruction: Is Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Needed? Nakahara, Kazunari Okuse, Chiaki Suetani, Keigo Michikawa, Yosuke Kobayashi, Shinjiro Otsubo, Takehito Itoh, Fumio Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study Aims. To evaluate the need for endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) before covered self-expandable metal stent (CSEMS) deployment for malignant lower biliary stricture with pancreatic duct obstruction. Methods. This study included 79 patients who underwent CSEMS deployment for unresectable malignant lower biliary stricture with pancreatic duct obstruction. Treatment outcomes and complications were compared between 38 patients with EST before CSEMS deployment (EST group) and 41 without EST (non-EST group). Results. The technical success rates were 100% in both the EST and the non-EST group. The incidence of pancreatitis was 2.6% in the EST, and 2.4% in the non-EST group (P = 0.51). The incidences of overall complications were 18.4% and 14.6%, respectively, (P = 0.65). Within the non-EST groups, the incidence of pancreatitis was 0% in patients with fully covered stent deployment and 3.6% in those with partially covered stent deployment (P = 0.69). In the multivariate analysis, younger age (P = 0.003, OR 12) and nonpancreatic cancer (P = 0.001, OR 24) were significant risk factors for overall complications after CSEMS deployment. EST was not identified as a risk factor. Conclusions. EST did not reduce the incidence of pancreatitis after CSEMS deployment in patients of unresectable distal malignant obstruction with pancreatic duct obstruction. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3845734/ /pubmed/24324486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/375613 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kazunari Nakahara et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Nakahara, Kazunari Okuse, Chiaki Suetani, Keigo Michikawa, Yosuke Kobayashi, Shinjiro Otsubo, Takehito Itoh, Fumio Covered Metal Stenting for Malignant Lower Biliary Stricture with Pancreatic Duct Obstruction: Is Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Needed? |
title | Covered Metal Stenting for Malignant Lower Biliary Stricture with Pancreatic Duct Obstruction: Is Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Needed? |
title_full | Covered Metal Stenting for Malignant Lower Biliary Stricture with Pancreatic Duct Obstruction: Is Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Needed? |
title_fullStr | Covered Metal Stenting for Malignant Lower Biliary Stricture with Pancreatic Duct Obstruction: Is Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Needed? |
title_full_unstemmed | Covered Metal Stenting for Malignant Lower Biliary Stricture with Pancreatic Duct Obstruction: Is Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Needed? |
title_short | Covered Metal Stenting for Malignant Lower Biliary Stricture with Pancreatic Duct Obstruction: Is Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Needed? |
title_sort | covered metal stenting for malignant lower biliary stricture with pancreatic duct obstruction: is endoscopic sphincterotomy needed? |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3845734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/375613 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakaharakazunari coveredmetalstentingformalignantlowerbiliarystricturewithpancreaticductobstructionisendoscopicsphincterotomyneeded AT okusechiaki coveredmetalstentingformalignantlowerbiliarystricturewithpancreaticductobstructionisendoscopicsphincterotomyneeded AT suetanikeigo coveredmetalstentingformalignantlowerbiliarystricturewithpancreaticductobstructionisendoscopicsphincterotomyneeded AT michikawayosuke coveredmetalstentingformalignantlowerbiliarystricturewithpancreaticductobstructionisendoscopicsphincterotomyneeded AT kobayashishinjiro coveredmetalstentingformalignantlowerbiliarystricturewithpancreaticductobstructionisendoscopicsphincterotomyneeded AT otsubotakehito coveredmetalstentingformalignantlowerbiliarystricturewithpancreaticductobstructionisendoscopicsphincterotomyneeded AT itohfumio coveredmetalstentingformalignantlowerbiliarystricturewithpancreaticductobstructionisendoscopicsphincterotomyneeded |