Cargando…

Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey

BACKGROUND: Peer physical examination (PPE) is a method of training in medical and osteopathic curricula. The aim of this study was to compare the acceptability of PPE in two classes of medical and osteopathic students after their first experience, to obtain comparative information useful for an und...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Consorti, Fabrizio, Mancuso, Rosaria, Piccolo, Annalisa, Consorti, Giacomo, Zurlo, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3846411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23968312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-111
_version_ 1782293425790386176
author Consorti, Fabrizio
Mancuso, Rosaria
Piccolo, Annalisa
Consorti, Giacomo
Zurlo, Joseph
author_facet Consorti, Fabrizio
Mancuso, Rosaria
Piccolo, Annalisa
Consorti, Giacomo
Zurlo, Joseph
author_sort Consorti, Fabrizio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peer physical examination (PPE) is a method of training in medical and osteopathic curricula. The aim of this study was to compare the acceptability of PPE in two classes of medical and osteopathic students after their first experience, to obtain comparative information useful for an understanding of the different professional approaches. The leading hypothesis was that osteopathic students enter the curriculum with a more positive attitude to bodily contact. As a secondary aim, this study validated the new version of a questionnaire to assess the acceptability of PPE. METHODS: A new version of a previously validated questionnaire and an instrument from the literature (the Examining Fellow Student [EFS] questionnaire) were used for a cross-sectional survey in a class of 129 3rd year medical students and in two parallel classes of 1st year osteopathic students (total of 112 students). RESULTS: The mean score of the new questionnaire was significantly higher for the osteopathic students than for the medical students (53.4 ± 6.3 vs. 43.4 ± 8.9; p < 0.01). The only independent variables that were significantly predictive of the score in a linear regression analysis were gender and the condition of medical or osteopathic student. The EFS mean score also showed a significant difference between the osteopathic and medical students (30.76 ± 2.9 vs. 27.85 ± 4.3; p < 0.01). Factor analysis of the new questionnaire identified three factors (appropriateness and usefulness, sexual implications and passive role) accounting for 62.8% of the variance. Criterion validity was assessed by correlation with the EFS (Pearson’s r coefficient = 0.61). Reliability was expressed in terms of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, which equals 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: These quantitative results are consistent with previous qualitative research on the process of embodiment both in medicine and osteopathy. The new questionnaire proved to be valid and reliable. The objective assessment of the acceptability of PPE is a way to determine differences in students’ attitudes towards contact with the body and can be used for counselling students regarding career choice. This study can also highlight differences between students from different professions and serve as a basis for reflection for improved mutual interprofessional understanding and future interprofessional education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3846411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38464112013-12-03 Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey Consorti, Fabrizio Mancuso, Rosaria Piccolo, Annalisa Consorti, Giacomo Zurlo, Joseph BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Peer physical examination (PPE) is a method of training in medical and osteopathic curricula. The aim of this study was to compare the acceptability of PPE in two classes of medical and osteopathic students after their first experience, to obtain comparative information useful for an understanding of the different professional approaches. The leading hypothesis was that osteopathic students enter the curriculum with a more positive attitude to bodily contact. As a secondary aim, this study validated the new version of a questionnaire to assess the acceptability of PPE. METHODS: A new version of a previously validated questionnaire and an instrument from the literature (the Examining Fellow Student [EFS] questionnaire) were used for a cross-sectional survey in a class of 129 3rd year medical students and in two parallel classes of 1st year osteopathic students (total of 112 students). RESULTS: The mean score of the new questionnaire was significantly higher for the osteopathic students than for the medical students (53.4 ± 6.3 vs. 43.4 ± 8.9; p < 0.01). The only independent variables that were significantly predictive of the score in a linear regression analysis were gender and the condition of medical or osteopathic student. The EFS mean score also showed a significant difference between the osteopathic and medical students (30.76 ± 2.9 vs. 27.85 ± 4.3; p < 0.01). Factor analysis of the new questionnaire identified three factors (appropriateness and usefulness, sexual implications and passive role) accounting for 62.8% of the variance. Criterion validity was assessed by correlation with the EFS (Pearson’s r coefficient = 0.61). Reliability was expressed in terms of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, which equals 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: These quantitative results are consistent with previous qualitative research on the process of embodiment both in medicine and osteopathy. The new questionnaire proved to be valid and reliable. The objective assessment of the acceptability of PPE is a way to determine differences in students’ attitudes towards contact with the body and can be used for counselling students regarding career choice. This study can also highlight differences between students from different professions and serve as a basis for reflection for improved mutual interprofessional understanding and future interprofessional education. BioMed Central 2013-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3846411/ /pubmed/23968312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-111 Text en Copyright © 2013 Consorti et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Consorti, Fabrizio
Mancuso, Rosaria
Piccolo, Annalisa
Consorti, Giacomo
Zurlo, Joseph
Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey
title Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey
title_full Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey
title_fullStr Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey
title_short Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey
title_sort evaluation of the acceptability of peer physical examination (ppe) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3846411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23968312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-111
work_keys_str_mv AT consortifabrizio evaluationoftheacceptabilityofpeerphysicalexaminationppeinmedicalandosteopathicstudentsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT mancusorosaria evaluationoftheacceptabilityofpeerphysicalexaminationppeinmedicalandosteopathicstudentsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT piccoloannalisa evaluationoftheacceptabilityofpeerphysicalexaminationppeinmedicalandosteopathicstudentsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT consortigiacomo evaluationoftheacceptabilityofpeerphysicalexaminationppeinmedicalandosteopathicstudentsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT zurlojoseph evaluationoftheacceptabilityofpeerphysicalexaminationppeinmedicalandosteopathicstudentsacrosssectionalsurvey