Cargando…

Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Dental caries is a common disease and affects many adults worldwide. Inlay or onlay restoration is widely used to treat the resulting tooth substance loss. Two esthetic materials can be used to manufacture an inlay/onlay restoration of the tooth: ceramic or composite. Here, we present th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fron Chabouis, Hélène, Prot, Caroline, Fonteneau, Cyrille, Nasr, Karim, Chabreron, Olivier, Cazier, Stéphane, Moussally, Christian, Gaucher, Alexandre, Khabthani Ben Jaballah, Inès, Boyer, Renaud, Leforestier, Jean-François, Caumont-Prim, Aurore, Chemla, Florence, Maman, Louis, Nabet, Cathy, Attal, Jean-Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3846627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24004961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-278
_version_ 1782293458116935680
author Fron Chabouis, Hélène
Prot, Caroline
Fonteneau, Cyrille
Nasr, Karim
Chabreron, Olivier
Cazier, Stéphane
Moussally, Christian
Gaucher, Alexandre
Khabthani Ben Jaballah, Inès
Boyer, Renaud
Leforestier, Jean-François
Caumont-Prim, Aurore
Chemla, Florence
Maman, Louis
Nabet, Cathy
Attal, Jean-Pierre
author_facet Fron Chabouis, Hélène
Prot, Caroline
Fonteneau, Cyrille
Nasr, Karim
Chabreron, Olivier
Cazier, Stéphane
Moussally, Christian
Gaucher, Alexandre
Khabthani Ben Jaballah, Inès
Boyer, Renaud
Leforestier, Jean-François
Caumont-Prim, Aurore
Chemla, Florence
Maman, Louis
Nabet, Cathy
Attal, Jean-Pierre
author_sort Fron Chabouis, Hélène
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dental caries is a common disease and affects many adults worldwide. Inlay or onlay restoration is widely used to treat the resulting tooth substance loss. Two esthetic materials can be used to manufacture an inlay/onlay restoration of the tooth: ceramic or composite. Here, we present the protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the clinical efficacy of both materials for tooth restoration. Other objectives are analysis of overall quality, wear, restoration survival and prognosis. METHODS: The CEramic and COmposite Inlays Assessment (CECOIA) trial is an open-label, parallel-group, multicenter RCT involving two hospitals and five private practices. In all, 400 patients will be included. Inclusion criteria are adults who need an inlay/onlay restoration for one tooth (that can be isolated with use of a dental dam and has at least one intact cusp), can tolerate restorative procedures and do not have severe bruxism, periodontal or carious disease or poor oral hygiene. The decayed tissue will be evicted, the cavity will be prepared for receiving an inlay/onlay and the patient will be randomized by use of a centralized web-based interface to receive: 1) a ceramic or 2) composite inlay or onlay. Treatment allocation will be balanced (1:1). The inlay/onlay will be adhesively luted. Follow-up will be for 2 years and may be extended; two independent examiners will perform the evaluations. The primary outcome measure will be the score obtained with use of the consensus instrument of the Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) World Dental Federation. Secondary outcomes include this instrument’s items, inlay/onlay wear, overall quality and survival of the inlay/onlay. Data will be analyzed by a statistician blinded to treatments and an adjusted ordinal logistic regression model will be used to compare the efficacy of both materials. DISCUSSION: For clinicians, the CECOIA trial results may help with evidence-based recommendations concerning the choice of materials for inlay/onlay restoration. For patients, the results may lead to improvement in long-term restoration. For researchers, the results may provide ideas for further research concerning inlay/onlay materials and prognosis. This trial is funded by a grant from the French Ministry of Health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01724827
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3846627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38466272013-12-03 Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial Fron Chabouis, Hélène Prot, Caroline Fonteneau, Cyrille Nasr, Karim Chabreron, Olivier Cazier, Stéphane Moussally, Christian Gaucher, Alexandre Khabthani Ben Jaballah, Inès Boyer, Renaud Leforestier, Jean-François Caumont-Prim, Aurore Chemla, Florence Maman, Louis Nabet, Cathy Attal, Jean-Pierre Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Dental caries is a common disease and affects many adults worldwide. Inlay or onlay restoration is widely used to treat the resulting tooth substance loss. Two esthetic materials can be used to manufacture an inlay/onlay restoration of the tooth: ceramic or composite. Here, we present the protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the clinical efficacy of both materials for tooth restoration. Other objectives are analysis of overall quality, wear, restoration survival and prognosis. METHODS: The CEramic and COmposite Inlays Assessment (CECOIA) trial is an open-label, parallel-group, multicenter RCT involving two hospitals and five private practices. In all, 400 patients will be included. Inclusion criteria are adults who need an inlay/onlay restoration for one tooth (that can be isolated with use of a dental dam and has at least one intact cusp), can tolerate restorative procedures and do not have severe bruxism, periodontal or carious disease or poor oral hygiene. The decayed tissue will be evicted, the cavity will be prepared for receiving an inlay/onlay and the patient will be randomized by use of a centralized web-based interface to receive: 1) a ceramic or 2) composite inlay or onlay. Treatment allocation will be balanced (1:1). The inlay/onlay will be adhesively luted. Follow-up will be for 2 years and may be extended; two independent examiners will perform the evaluations. The primary outcome measure will be the score obtained with use of the consensus instrument of the Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) World Dental Federation. Secondary outcomes include this instrument’s items, inlay/onlay wear, overall quality and survival of the inlay/onlay. Data will be analyzed by a statistician blinded to treatments and an adjusted ordinal logistic regression model will be used to compare the efficacy of both materials. DISCUSSION: For clinicians, the CECOIA trial results may help with evidence-based recommendations concerning the choice of materials for inlay/onlay restoration. For patients, the results may lead to improvement in long-term restoration. For researchers, the results may provide ideas for further research concerning inlay/onlay materials and prognosis. This trial is funded by a grant from the French Ministry of Health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01724827 BioMed Central 2013-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3846627/ /pubmed/24004961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-278 Text en Copyright © 2013 Fron Chabouis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Fron Chabouis, Hélène
Prot, Caroline
Fonteneau, Cyrille
Nasr, Karim
Chabreron, Olivier
Cazier, Stéphane
Moussally, Christian
Gaucher, Alexandre
Khabthani Ben Jaballah, Inès
Boyer, Renaud
Leforestier, Jean-François
Caumont-Prim, Aurore
Chemla, Florence
Maman, Louis
Nabet, Cathy
Attal, Jean-Pierre
Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the cecoia randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3846627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24004961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-278
work_keys_str_mv AT fronchabouishelene efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT protcaroline efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fonteneaucyrille efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nasrkarim efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chabreronolivier efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cazierstephane efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moussallychristian efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gaucheralexandre efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT khabthanibenjaballahines efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT boyerrenaud efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leforestierjeanfrancois efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT caumontprimaurore efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chemlaflorence efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mamanlouis efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nabetcathy efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT attaljeanpierre efficacyofcompositeversusceramicinlaysandonlaysstudyprotocolforthececoiarandomizedcontrolledtrial