Cargando…

Understanding Patients’ Adherence-Related Beliefs about Medicines Prescribed for Long-Term Conditions: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework

BACKGROUND: Patients’ beliefs about treatment influence treatment engagement and adherence. The Necessity-Concerns Framework postulates that adherence is influenced by implicit judgements of personal need for the treatment (necessity beliefs) and concerns about the potential adverse consequences of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horne, Rob, Chapman, Sarah C. E., Parham, Rhian, Freemantle, Nick, Forbes, Alastair, Cooper, Vanessa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3846635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24312488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080633
_version_ 1782293459914194944
author Horne, Rob
Chapman, Sarah C. E.
Parham, Rhian
Freemantle, Nick
Forbes, Alastair
Cooper, Vanessa
author_facet Horne, Rob
Chapman, Sarah C. E.
Parham, Rhian
Freemantle, Nick
Forbes, Alastair
Cooper, Vanessa
author_sort Horne, Rob
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients’ beliefs about treatment influence treatment engagement and adherence. The Necessity-Concerns Framework postulates that adherence is influenced by implicit judgements of personal need for the treatment (necessity beliefs) and concerns about the potential adverse consequences of taking it. OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of the NCF in explaining nonadherence to prescribed medicines. DATA SOURCES: We searched EMBASE, Medline, PsycInfo, CDSR/DARE/CCT and CINAHL from January 1999 to April 2013 and handsearched reference sections from relevant articles. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) to examine perceptions of personal necessity for medication and concerns about potential adverse effects, in relation to a measure of adherence to medication. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with long-term conditions. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of methodological quality was assessed by two independent reviewers. We pooled odds ratios for adherence using random effects models. RESULTS: We identified 3777 studies, of which 94 (N = 25,072) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Across studies, higher adherence was associated with stronger perceptions of necessity of treatment, OR = 1.742, 95% CI [1.569, 1.934], p<0.0001, and fewer Concerns about treatment, OR = 0.504, 95% CI: [0.450, 0.564], p<0.0001. These relationships remained significant when data were stratified by study size, the country in which the research was conducted and the type of adherence measure used. LIMITATIONS: Few prospective longitudinal studies using objective adherence measures were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The Necessity-Concerns Framework is a useful conceptual model for understanding patients’ perspectives on prescribed medicines. Taking account of patients’ necessity beliefs and concerns could enhance the quality of prescribing by helping clinicians to engage patients in treatment decisions and support optimal adherence to appropriate prescriptions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3846635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38466352013-12-05 Understanding Patients’ Adherence-Related Beliefs about Medicines Prescribed for Long-Term Conditions: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework Horne, Rob Chapman, Sarah C. E. Parham, Rhian Freemantle, Nick Forbes, Alastair Cooper, Vanessa PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients’ beliefs about treatment influence treatment engagement and adherence. The Necessity-Concerns Framework postulates that adherence is influenced by implicit judgements of personal need for the treatment (necessity beliefs) and concerns about the potential adverse consequences of taking it. OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of the NCF in explaining nonadherence to prescribed medicines. DATA SOURCES: We searched EMBASE, Medline, PsycInfo, CDSR/DARE/CCT and CINAHL from January 1999 to April 2013 and handsearched reference sections from relevant articles. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) to examine perceptions of personal necessity for medication and concerns about potential adverse effects, in relation to a measure of adherence to medication. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with long-term conditions. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of methodological quality was assessed by two independent reviewers. We pooled odds ratios for adherence using random effects models. RESULTS: We identified 3777 studies, of which 94 (N = 25,072) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Across studies, higher adherence was associated with stronger perceptions of necessity of treatment, OR = 1.742, 95% CI [1.569, 1.934], p<0.0001, and fewer Concerns about treatment, OR = 0.504, 95% CI: [0.450, 0.564], p<0.0001. These relationships remained significant when data were stratified by study size, the country in which the research was conducted and the type of adherence measure used. LIMITATIONS: Few prospective longitudinal studies using objective adherence measures were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The Necessity-Concerns Framework is a useful conceptual model for understanding patients’ perspectives on prescribed medicines. Taking account of patients’ necessity beliefs and concerns could enhance the quality of prescribing by helping clinicians to engage patients in treatment decisions and support optimal adherence to appropriate prescriptions. Public Library of Science 2013-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3846635/ /pubmed/24312488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080633 Text en © 2013 Horne et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Horne, Rob
Chapman, Sarah C. E.
Parham, Rhian
Freemantle, Nick
Forbes, Alastair
Cooper, Vanessa
Understanding Patients’ Adherence-Related Beliefs about Medicines Prescribed for Long-Term Conditions: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework
title Understanding Patients’ Adherence-Related Beliefs about Medicines Prescribed for Long-Term Conditions: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework
title_full Understanding Patients’ Adherence-Related Beliefs about Medicines Prescribed for Long-Term Conditions: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework
title_fullStr Understanding Patients’ Adherence-Related Beliefs about Medicines Prescribed for Long-Term Conditions: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Patients’ Adherence-Related Beliefs about Medicines Prescribed for Long-Term Conditions: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework
title_short Understanding Patients’ Adherence-Related Beliefs about Medicines Prescribed for Long-Term Conditions: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework
title_sort understanding patients’ adherence-related beliefs about medicines prescribed for long-term conditions: a meta-analytic review of the necessity-concerns framework
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3846635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24312488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080633
work_keys_str_mv AT hornerob understandingpatientsadherencerelatedbeliefsaboutmedicinesprescribedforlongtermconditionsametaanalyticreviewofthenecessityconcernsframework
AT chapmansarahce understandingpatientsadherencerelatedbeliefsaboutmedicinesprescribedforlongtermconditionsametaanalyticreviewofthenecessityconcernsframework
AT parhamrhian understandingpatientsadherencerelatedbeliefsaboutmedicinesprescribedforlongtermconditionsametaanalyticreviewofthenecessityconcernsframework
AT freemantlenick understandingpatientsadherencerelatedbeliefsaboutmedicinesprescribedforlongtermconditionsametaanalyticreviewofthenecessityconcernsframework
AT forbesalastair understandingpatientsadherencerelatedbeliefsaboutmedicinesprescribedforlongtermconditionsametaanalyticreviewofthenecessityconcernsframework
AT coopervanessa understandingpatientsadherencerelatedbeliefsaboutmedicinesprescribedforlongtermconditionsametaanalyticreviewofthenecessityconcernsframework