Cargando…
The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer
BACKGROUND: No large-scale study has explored the combined effect of patients’ individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) on their access to a low-volume provider for breast cancer surgery. The purpose of this study was to explore under a nationwide universal health insurance system whet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3846901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24312589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081801 |
_version_ | 1782293509093457920 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Chun-Ming Yin, Wen-Yao Wei, Chang-Kuo Lin, Chun-Hung Huang, Kuang-Yung Lin, Shih-Pin Lee, Cheng-Hung Chou, Pesus Lee, Ching-Chih |
author_facet | Chang, Chun-Ming Yin, Wen-Yao Wei, Chang-Kuo Lin, Chun-Hung Huang, Kuang-Yung Lin, Shih-Pin Lee, Cheng-Hung Chou, Pesus Lee, Ching-Chih |
author_sort | Chang, Chun-Ming |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: No large-scale study has explored the combined effect of patients’ individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) on their access to a low-volume provider for breast cancer surgery. The purpose of this study was to explore under a nationwide universal health insurance system whether breast cancer patients from a lower individual and neighborhood SES are disproportionately receiving breast cancer surgery from low-volume providers. METHODS: 5,750 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery in 2006 were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the access to a low-volume provider between the different individual and neighborhood SES groups after adjusting for possible confounding and risk factors. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was used to determine how well the model fit the data. RESULTS: Univariate analysis data shows that patients in disadvantaged neighborhood were more likely to receive breast cancer surgery at low-volume hospitals; and lower-SES patients were more likely to receive surgery from low-volume surgeons. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for patient characteristics, the odds ratios of moderate- and low-SES patients in disadvantaged neighborhood receiving surgery at low-volume hospitals was 1.47 (95% confidence interval=1.19-1.81) and 1.31 (95% confidence interval=1.05-1.64) respectively compared with high-SES patients in advantaged neighborhood. Moderate- and low-SES patients from either advantaged or disadvantaged neighborhood had an odds ratios ranging from 1.51 to 1.80 (p<0.001) to receiving surgery from low-volume surgeons. In Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, p>0.05 that shows the model has a good fit. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cross-sectional study, even under a nationwide universal health insurance system, disparities in access to healthcare existed. Breast cancer patients from a lower individual and neighborhood SES are more likely to receive breast cancer surgery from low-volume providers. The authorities and public health policies should keep focusing on these vulnerable groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3846901 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38469012013-12-05 The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer Chang, Chun-Ming Yin, Wen-Yao Wei, Chang-Kuo Lin, Chun-Hung Huang, Kuang-Yung Lin, Shih-Pin Lee, Cheng-Hung Chou, Pesus Lee, Ching-Chih PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: No large-scale study has explored the combined effect of patients’ individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) on their access to a low-volume provider for breast cancer surgery. The purpose of this study was to explore under a nationwide universal health insurance system whether breast cancer patients from a lower individual and neighborhood SES are disproportionately receiving breast cancer surgery from low-volume providers. METHODS: 5,750 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery in 2006 were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the access to a low-volume provider between the different individual and neighborhood SES groups after adjusting for possible confounding and risk factors. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was used to determine how well the model fit the data. RESULTS: Univariate analysis data shows that patients in disadvantaged neighborhood were more likely to receive breast cancer surgery at low-volume hospitals; and lower-SES patients were more likely to receive surgery from low-volume surgeons. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for patient characteristics, the odds ratios of moderate- and low-SES patients in disadvantaged neighborhood receiving surgery at low-volume hospitals was 1.47 (95% confidence interval=1.19-1.81) and 1.31 (95% confidence interval=1.05-1.64) respectively compared with high-SES patients in advantaged neighborhood. Moderate- and low-SES patients from either advantaged or disadvantaged neighborhood had an odds ratios ranging from 1.51 to 1.80 (p<0.001) to receiving surgery from low-volume surgeons. In Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, p>0.05 that shows the model has a good fit. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cross-sectional study, even under a nationwide universal health insurance system, disparities in access to healthcare existed. Breast cancer patients from a lower individual and neighborhood SES are more likely to receive breast cancer surgery from low-volume providers. The authorities and public health policies should keep focusing on these vulnerable groups. Public Library of Science 2013-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3846901/ /pubmed/24312589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081801 Text en © 2013 Chang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chang, Chun-Ming Yin, Wen-Yao Wei, Chang-Kuo Lin, Chun-Hung Huang, Kuang-Yung Lin, Shih-Pin Lee, Cheng-Hung Chou, Pesus Lee, Ching-Chih The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer |
title | The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer |
title_full | The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr | The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer |
title_short | The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer |
title_sort | association of socioeconomic status and access to low-volume service providers in breast cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3846901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24312589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changchunming theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT yinwenyao theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT weichangkuo theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT linchunhung theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT huangkuangyung theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT linshihpin theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT leechenghung theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT choupesus theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT leechingchih theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT changchunming associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT yinwenyao associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT weichangkuo associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT linchunhung associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT huangkuangyung associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT linshihpin associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT leechenghung associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT choupesus associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer AT leechingchih associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer |