Cargando…

The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND: No large-scale study has explored the combined effect of patients’ individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) on their access to a low-volume provider for breast cancer surgery. The purpose of this study was to explore under a nationwide universal health insurance system whet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Chun-Ming, Yin, Wen-Yao, Wei, Chang-Kuo, Lin, Chun-Hung, Huang, Kuang-Yung, Lin, Shih-Pin, Lee, Cheng-Hung, Chou, Pesus, Lee, Ching-Chih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3846901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24312589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081801
_version_ 1782293509093457920
author Chang, Chun-Ming
Yin, Wen-Yao
Wei, Chang-Kuo
Lin, Chun-Hung
Huang, Kuang-Yung
Lin, Shih-Pin
Lee, Cheng-Hung
Chou, Pesus
Lee, Ching-Chih
author_facet Chang, Chun-Ming
Yin, Wen-Yao
Wei, Chang-Kuo
Lin, Chun-Hung
Huang, Kuang-Yung
Lin, Shih-Pin
Lee, Cheng-Hung
Chou, Pesus
Lee, Ching-Chih
author_sort Chang, Chun-Ming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: No large-scale study has explored the combined effect of patients’ individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) on their access to a low-volume provider for breast cancer surgery. The purpose of this study was to explore under a nationwide universal health insurance system whether breast cancer patients from a lower individual and neighborhood SES are disproportionately receiving breast cancer surgery from low-volume providers. METHODS: 5,750 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery in 2006 were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the access to a low-volume provider between the different individual and neighborhood SES groups after adjusting for possible confounding and risk factors. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was used to determine how well the model fit the data. RESULTS: Univariate analysis data shows that patients in disadvantaged neighborhood were more likely to receive breast cancer surgery at low-volume hospitals; and lower-SES patients were more likely to receive surgery from low-volume surgeons. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for patient characteristics, the odds ratios of moderate- and low-SES patients in disadvantaged neighborhood receiving surgery at low-volume hospitals was 1.47 (95% confidence interval=1.19-1.81) and 1.31 (95% confidence interval=1.05-1.64) respectively compared with high-SES patients in advantaged neighborhood. Moderate- and low-SES patients from either advantaged or disadvantaged neighborhood had an odds ratios ranging from 1.51 to 1.80 (p<0.001) to receiving surgery from low-volume surgeons. In Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, p>0.05 that shows the model has a good fit. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cross-sectional study, even under a nationwide universal health insurance system, disparities in access to healthcare existed. Breast cancer patients from a lower individual and neighborhood SES are more likely to receive breast cancer surgery from low-volume providers. The authorities and public health policies should keep focusing on these vulnerable groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3846901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38469012013-12-05 The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer Chang, Chun-Ming Yin, Wen-Yao Wei, Chang-Kuo Lin, Chun-Hung Huang, Kuang-Yung Lin, Shih-Pin Lee, Cheng-Hung Chou, Pesus Lee, Ching-Chih PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: No large-scale study has explored the combined effect of patients’ individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) on their access to a low-volume provider for breast cancer surgery. The purpose of this study was to explore under a nationwide universal health insurance system whether breast cancer patients from a lower individual and neighborhood SES are disproportionately receiving breast cancer surgery from low-volume providers. METHODS: 5,750 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery in 2006 were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the access to a low-volume provider between the different individual and neighborhood SES groups after adjusting for possible confounding and risk factors. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was used to determine how well the model fit the data. RESULTS: Univariate analysis data shows that patients in disadvantaged neighborhood were more likely to receive breast cancer surgery at low-volume hospitals; and lower-SES patients were more likely to receive surgery from low-volume surgeons. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for patient characteristics, the odds ratios of moderate- and low-SES patients in disadvantaged neighborhood receiving surgery at low-volume hospitals was 1.47 (95% confidence interval=1.19-1.81) and 1.31 (95% confidence interval=1.05-1.64) respectively compared with high-SES patients in advantaged neighborhood. Moderate- and low-SES patients from either advantaged or disadvantaged neighborhood had an odds ratios ranging from 1.51 to 1.80 (p<0.001) to receiving surgery from low-volume surgeons. In Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, p>0.05 that shows the model has a good fit. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cross-sectional study, even under a nationwide universal health insurance system, disparities in access to healthcare existed. Breast cancer patients from a lower individual and neighborhood SES are more likely to receive breast cancer surgery from low-volume providers. The authorities and public health policies should keep focusing on these vulnerable groups. Public Library of Science 2013-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3846901/ /pubmed/24312589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081801 Text en © 2013 Chang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chang, Chun-Ming
Yin, Wen-Yao
Wei, Chang-Kuo
Lin, Chun-Hung
Huang, Kuang-Yung
Lin, Shih-Pin
Lee, Cheng-Hung
Chou, Pesus
Lee, Ching-Chih
The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer
title The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer
title_full The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer
title_fullStr The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer
title_short The Association of Socioeconomic Status and Access to Low-Volume Service Providers in Breast Cancer
title_sort association of socioeconomic status and access to low-volume service providers in breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3846901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24312589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081801
work_keys_str_mv AT changchunming theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT yinwenyao theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT weichangkuo theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT linchunhung theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT huangkuangyung theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT linshihpin theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT leechenghung theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT choupesus theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT leechingchih theassociationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT changchunming associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT yinwenyao associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT weichangkuo associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT linchunhung associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT huangkuangyung associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT linshihpin associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT leechenghung associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT choupesus associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer
AT leechingchih associationofsocioeconomicstatusandaccesstolowvolumeserviceprovidersinbreastcancer